Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
retirement planning conclusion
retirement planning conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: retirement planning conclusion
Aging American must now secure other streams of income for retirement to secure their lifestyle.
In her article, ‘Understanding Retirement Planning’, Sue Haggerty stated that “the most important aspect of retirement planning is understanding what your income replacement rate needs to be during retirement in order to maintain your pre-retirement lifestyle.” Consequently, knowing the replacement rate helps put the retirees in a position to avoid cutbacks. Haggerty conveyed, ordinarily the retiree does not need to have 100% of their pre retirement income after they retire due to the fact that Retirees do not have to pay into Social Security. Additionally, since they are retired there is no need to spend funds on work-related items. Surprisingly,
…show more content…
(2010)-(States, Congressional Washington DC): Congress of the United Budget Office, Scholarly article Social Security- United States- Finance: retirement income; online Access: http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS, http://www.cbo.gov/publication/21547
Meyerson, N. (2010) up some interesting point in research about the down fall of social security
Haggerty, Sue (Jun-Aug2017) Retirement planning. Catholic Digest Vol. 81 Issue 7, p33-38. ISSN: 0008-7998 Accession Number: 123563838 Database: MasterFILE Premier 6p. http://www.catholicdigest.com, http://web.b.ebschost.com’umuc.edu/detail
Applebaum, Robert, Cummins, Phyllis (Summer 2017), From Rock ‘n’ Roll to Rock ‘n’ Chair: Are Baby Boomers Financially Ready for Retirement? Journal of American Society on Aging Vol. 41 Issue 2, P88 – 94. 7p. Database: Master FILE Premier
Alderson, M. J, Betker, B. L (Setember2017) Does the benefit of Deferring Social Security offset the Opportunity Cost to do so; Journal of Financial Planning Vol. 30 Issue 9, p38-48 Article ISSN:1040-3981 access Number: 124960695 NAICS Codes: 541611 Administration Management and General Consulting Service, 523930 Investment Advices. Database Business Source completes Citation.
In America’s early days before the kickoff of industry, there was little need for retirement savings for a few key reasons. First of all, people were dying at a much earlier age; most people didn’t live past 38, whereas in 1900, 60 years of age was common for about 40 percent of the population and 15 percent experienced 80 years of life. Another reason for the irrelevance of social security in the 19th century and earlier was that people were usually living rurally on farms with extended families to take care of them. Furthermore, the Civil War also didn’t allow the government much economic room to consider providing a service such as social security. However, after the Civil War, pensions were a form of social security for civil war veterans that carried into their retirement. Unfortunately these pensions provided support for only a very small portion of the population; not even one percent of Americans received these pensions. Despite a much lower need for social security in the 18th ...
...n the retirement age. Yet Social Security's fiscal outlook remains strong. (“Next New Deal”, par. 3)
The White House, along with the politically biased Social Security trustees’, argue that Social Security is facing a crisis in that “the currently legislated structure of revenues and benefits, the system will eventually be unable to meet its financial obligations” (Bethel University, 2006, p.344). At its inception in the 1930’s, “there were more than sixteen workers to support each Social Security recipient. Today, there are about three, and in 2031, that number is predicted to dwindle to about two (Driscoll & Konczal, 2009). And the number of retirees is expected to nearly double from about 37 million to around 73 million (Driscoll & Konczal, 2009). So how to pay for this? The White House’s proposed solution is to establish individual retirement accounts which would be gradually phased in for younger entrants into the workforce allowing them “to build a “nest egg” for retirement…” (Bethel University, 2006, p.347) while maintaining the existing structure for those 55 or older. Other seemingly attractive features are ownership and control, the ability to in...
Today, the future of Social Security is in the news again. The reason Social Security is of such concern is that the extremely large group of citizens born in the post-World War II period—the much-discussed baby-boom generation—is retiring. The generation that will take its place in the workforce is far smaller in proportion to the number of retirees, raising fears about the sustainability of Social Security. In the past, proposed solutions to the various problems facing Social Security aroused great debate. Each time, however, the arguments were stilled, repairs were made, and the system continued to fulfill its mandate. That uncertainty about the future has resulted in suggestions for change that range from minor adjustments to complete privatization of the ...
As a person reaches retirement age, they are faced with many things to deal with. Retirement from work is one of the many realities they face. If they are not financially stable enough to retire, many continue to work rather than face the uncertainty of their financial future. Retirees do not get enough from Social Security that many are forced to live in low cost housing or become homeless, especially our veterans. Applying for Medicare Insurance is another obstacle an elderly person will have to face. Many are afraid that they may not be able to han...
A better way to measure the financial trouble facing Social Security is to compare the promised total future benefits to the program 's total future taxes on a present value basis. Unless policymakers cut Social Security and other programs, the fiscal and economic outlook for the nation looks grim. The large baby boomer generation is beginning to retire in droves and average life spans in the nation are continuing to rise. Those changing demographics are driving Social Security 's financial imbalances. When Social Security was created in 1935, the life expectancy for
Social security, since instituted in 1935, has kept many elderly people from running below the poverty line (Hosansky). In 2015, the Social Security Administration predicted that the funds would be depleted by 2034 (Max). This poses a serious threat to the living situation of future generations when they retire. Our elderly, by today’s standards, enjoy a comfortable lifestyle. They are able to retire and still make over one thousand dollars a month. Some people also have private pensions which allow them to live even more comfortably. But with social security funds running out, we must ask the inevitable question. Is it worth having social security anymore? Social security should be kept. One must never fully rely on social security. In addition
The push for Congress to pass legislation protecting the rights of employees and their retirement was inevitable. Retirement plans are extremely important for all working individuals. Having funds to keep or exceed ones current standard of living and to enjoy one’s life beyond expectations after retire...
According to Congressman Richard Gephardt, the social security was not meant to be the sole source of retirement income but rather as a foundation for retirement to give all working Americans a safety cushion. There will be money in the fund until 2029, so distressing baby boomers don’t have to worry. After that money is depleted the revenue from the payroll tax will be sufficient enough to pay 75% of every social security benefit for the subsequent 75 years. But how many burdens should be put on the young and middle age individuals, whose taxes basically pay for government retirement ...
Recent budget controversy in Congress and the media has once again brought to the forefront the pressing desire for fiscal responsibility in the United States Government. Although Congress came to a compromise over the budget in the proverbial eleventh hour, the extra attention afforded to the budget issue has reignited a lingering controversy: is the current system of transfer payment programs a financially viable one, or should these programs be recognized as an economic burden? As new waves of retirees stream into the system, it has once more become necessary to consider whether or not the U.S. Government can truly afford to keep the implicit promises it has made, and if the next generation to reach retirement age will see the benefits that it pays for current claimants to enjoy.
Those men and women who were readying themselves for retirement have found much of their nest egg lost and are needing to work longer into their retirement age. This is slowing and even stopping advancement opportunities in many organizations.
Retirement is one of the most important crossroads we face in life. It involves a fundamental change in lifestyle, one that calls for a totally new outlook on how we approach each day. All our lives we have been conditioned to think in terms of saving for our retirement years. Society has created this mystique about this time in our lives when we magically transform into different people with different lives when really we are the same people with different day to day lives. According to Medina, (2012) planning for retirement isn’t a "walk in the park" because for many people, debts are high while income is low.
Funding for social security becomes an important issue because the life expectancy has increased drastically since the initiation of social security. Individuals are able to retire at age sixty-five, the same age they begin receiving social security checks to provide them with the money needed to survive. The retirement age is now an issue because the program designed the age of retirement over twenty years ago which is significant because it is not designed for people to live much past eighty. Social security’s greatest obstacle is the shift in life expectancy because “most babies born in 1900 did not live past age 50, life expectancy at birth now exceeds 83 years” it is so difficult to accommodate and raise enough funds for individuals to
Allers, Kimberly Seals. "How Fit Are Your Finances?" Ebony 68.9 (2013): 93-97. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Nov. 2013. Bauer, Gabrielle, and John Southerst. "A promising retirement: your life, your way." Maclean's 18 Feb. 2013: 37+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
Retirement planning is a way to insure that you will have enough income to live comfortably when you retire. Most people will be retired 25 years or more, and careful planning is the key to successful retirement. Why would you want to have bill pressures and mortgages when all you really want to do is relax, or follow that dream of traveling the country in an RV?