Transition from Religious Truth to Social Facts

1436 Words3 Pages

In many areas of the globe, specifically the West, there is a new focus on individualism rather than seeing religion as an all-embracing principle. However, religion undoubtedly performs a social function to some extent in all religions, especially when analysing ideas surrounding death. Dumont argues that there has been a shift from ‘religious truth to a purely social fact’. (1970)

For Durkheim, religion is an eminently social thing. ‘Religious representations are collective representations which express collective realities’ (Thompson, 1982, p. 125 [excerpt from The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life]). This is expressed in Parry’s monograph through multiple examples. For many Hindus, filial duties are of utmost importance. These duties …show more content…

Furthermore, the way that we act out practice and perceive the world is shaped by our particular position in the social structure. Thus, death is an apt topic to review religion as a social function, as funeral rites and expressions of grief reflect a lot on specific societies and are culturally relative. 
Firstly, funeral rites are indicative of gender relations in wider social life. The roles for men and women when it comes to coping with death are clear cut. As in non-religious life, women are seen as more faint-hearted than man, thus, their job is to simply grieve. Parry notes many instances of women breaking into ‘sing-song wails’ (Parry, 1994, p.153). Men, on the other hand, are seen as more spiritually capable, and so they are able to perform rituals, they also do not openly express grief. Parry concludes then, that the ‘legitimate expression of grief is structured by gender’ (Parry, 1994, p.155). It is important to question whether these displays of emotion, or lack of, are socially constructed. Take, for example, Kamla, the son a recently deceased woman. During her funeral procession Kamla is seen looking very solemn and silent, Parry wonders if perhaps he wants to express his grief, but knows that he can’t due to social traditions. Through all castes in Banaras, the separation of genders in matters of grieving is continuous. 
Secondly, religion repeats social structure. Those without sons cannot …show more content…

For residents of Banaras, the rituals of death are continued time and time again. Whether they are directly involved or not, funeral practices underpin life in Banaras. The continuity of funeral practices over time means they gain importance, and are seen are imperative to the society. Parry discovers that ‘enquiries about the purpose of this or that rite commonly meet with the terse response that it has been ordained by the scriptures and handed down by ancestors’ (Parry, 1994, p.1). This further reinforces social cohesion during mourning periods. In some way, these funeral practices are comparable to Webb Keane’s theory of the ‘bored schoolboy who has memorised a credo which he recites by rote’ (Keane, 2008, S116). Clearly, it is possible for people to engage in funeral practices without fully understanding, or even believing, in them. If this is the case, then it is especially useful to consider religion as performing a social function. 
One variety of funeral practice, is performed by the Mahabrahman, the funeral priest. In this practice, the Mahabrahman will eat the ground up bones of the deceased. This process serves as a social function as it is not ‘merely a matter of the Mahabrahman representing the deceased’ there is ‘some kind of identity between them’ (Parry, 1994, p.77). Though the Mahabrahman finds the act disgusting, he will still carry it out, as he recognises the overwhelming importance in the

Open Document