Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Impact of Multinational Corporations
global impact of multinational corporation economically
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Impact of Multinational Corporations
It is true that some companies are registered and operating in more than one country at a time—this is, generally, that the company has its headquarters in one country and operates wholly or partially owned subsidiaries in others. In economic terms, establishing a multinational company includes both vertical and horizontal economies of scale and an increased market share. The purpose of this essay is to analyze if multinational companies apply a regional or global strategy on their way of working. For carrying they were taken some relevant cases of two authors. According to Alan Rugman, the world’s largest 500 companies are often called multinational enterprises, producing and/or distributing products and services across national borders. On …show more content…
A company is “global” when there is a connection between countries, and a strategy is “global” when it is integrated among different countries. It’s important to note that a global strategy should not be standardized products or a global manufacturing, but a flexible combination of many elements. In a global market strategy, a company treats the world as one singular market and one source of supply with barely any local variation.
Recent changes to the way countries handle business open way to more efficient global strategies, and it is expected that more of these changes take place in future years. For example, a growing change has been the way consumers shop—more and more customers among countries demand similar products. Another important change is the country’s willingness to be more open to business—many trade barriers are coming down or being reduces, and many agreements between countries for free trade are being established (Yip, 1995). Thus, a nation must provide favorable conditions for companies to compete internationally (Porter,
…show more content…
Growing integration of international markets leads to growth of competition on a worldwide scale, which implies the adoption of a global perspective in business strategies. Due to this, companies seek a global strategy due to the benefits it provides. The four main benefits Yip mentions in his book are: cost reduction, more quality, more client preference, more competitive effectiveness.
From the information collected about both types of strategies, we can conclude that both strategies are good for a company, and both are used widely. Regional strategies depend much on cultural and contextual factors within a country, while a global strategy does not face such problems since it is especially designed to not face them. A regional strategy may be best when a company works in certain areas, manufactures certain products and operates in a certain way, while global strategies is more homogenized.
The international dimension of business networks has remained relative unexplored, mainly because international business writers focus on multinational enterprises and network writers ignore international issues. it is widely accepted that multinationals drive globalization. Business activity by most large multinationals takes place within any one of the world’s three regional blocks (North America, Europe and
Hennart, J-F (2001) Theories of the Multinational Enterprise, In Rugman A. M. and T. L. Brewer (eds.) (2001) The Oxford Handbook of International Business, OUP, Oxford
Each strategy is based on being high or low in the following two categories global integration and national responsiveness. To have a low global integration it means the company doesn’t operate in every country. If the company is low in national responsiveness it means your customers use the product in the same way – no matter which country they are in and vice versa for high. International strategy is low in both global integration and national responsiveness. While, global strategy is high in global integration and low in national responsiveness. This particular strategy is low in cost. Next, Transnational strategy is high in both global integration and national responsiveness. This strategy is considered high in costs, but the most common strategy companies pursue. Lastly, multi- domestic strategy is low in global integration and high in national
Multinational enterprises date back to the era of merchant-adventurers, when the Dutch East India Company and the Massachusetts Bay Company traversed the world to extract resources and agricultural products from colonies (Gilpin 278-79). While contemporary multinational corporations (MNCs) do not command the armies and territories their colonial counterparts did, they are nevertheless highly influential actors in today’s increasingly globalized world.
Global expansion has developed a tactical imperative for nearly all large organizations. With this, marketing managers have a great deal on their hands in developing, monitoring and changing these strategies. Becoming international is an important factor in assisting organizations in becoming globally competitive. Strategic imperatives have helped in the development of globalization. Organizations can no longer stand still while their competitors grow stronger. This causes organizations to seek out new markets. Survival is a key indicator for an organization to enter into a global market place. What would our nation do without globalization and international trade? Below is a list of how international trade assists our nation’s economy according to Ellis (n.d.):
Multinational Strategy: Basically focuses on the tastes of local bazaar. The participation of company in a number of local bazaar besides its national market. Hence a particular strategy should be adopted to cater to the needs of each different country considering its consumer needs. This leads to a competitive advantage in each different country.
The first question is what type of strategy will work best for the company’s global expansion. The strategy chosen will depend heavily on the local culture of the country and on what type of product or service the company is providing. It should be noted that a company may not use the same strategy in each country in which it does business. According to Gucharan Das, former chairman of Procter & Gamble in India (2006), “Globalization does not mean imposing homog...
Mira Wilkins defines a multinational enterprise (MNE) as a “firm that extends itself over borders to do business outside its headquarters country.” By 1870, a period denoted as industrial capitalism, MNCs started to evolve and the nature...
International business refers to the commercial transactions across nation borders. The different ways international business is being done include trade, foreign direct investment, licensing, franchising and management contracts. Over the last five decades, statistics show that international trade and investment has grown faster than the domestic economies. The globalization in international business will continue to accelerate with the emergence of national economies, advancements in technology, increase in FDI, similarity of needs and wants as driving factors. Considering that 95% of potential customers are outside the US, it is difficult to not embrace today’s global economy. The continuing growth will present opportunities and challenges
Global strategy refers to the conscious and tactical plans laid by organisations in a bid to fit into worldwide business arena (David, 2012, p. 49). Companies have embraced different methods and views of how to exert authority and gain the upper hand in terms of competitiveness on the global platform. The two commonest approaches are the competitiveness and resource-based views of global strategy. Despite their effectiveness, both differ enormously in terms of foundational principles. More importantly, resources used to help organisations acquire a favourable state as touching global strategy can easily become weakness or liability that propels companies in the unexpected direction (Ghemawat, 2013, p. 80). This paper contrasts the competitiveness view to the resource-based approach and critically assesses the opinion that resources can actually turn into liabilities to pull organisations down, providing examples for both occasions.
Peng's strategies and Norback and Persson visualise business differently. Pang’s main consideration was the recognition and the identification of the strategies and methodologies that can be utilised to transform domestic firms into global firms. On the other side, Norback and person look at global business strategy from deferent angle as the suggested selling innovative ideas can be considered as a way for going global with minimum risks.
The increase of globalisation has presented businesses with unexampled opportunities for global investment and trade. Deemed by Rosabeth Moss Kanter as “one of the most powerful and pervasive influences on nations, businesses, workplaces, communities and lives” (1995, as cited in Schermerhorn et al., 2014), globalisation has allowed many multinational corporations (MNCs) to expand coordination and control of their activities to foreign countries by forming subsidiaries and joint ventures. This is necessary to establish a presence in the increasingly competitive international market and is now a pre-requisite for business survival and growth. To maintain and improve their global competitiveness, MNCs must manage both local and foreign enterprises effectively. This concept of international management can be simply described as the “management in organisations with business interests in more than one country” (Schermerhorn et al., 2014, p. 90) and is applicable to MNCs, who are defined as organisations with “extensive international operations in more than one foreign country” (Schermerhorn et al., 2014, p. 101). Undeniably, administrating operations on such a vast basis will present challenges. These challenges have been thoroughly analysed in numerous studies, which have also offered methods to develop effective policies and practices that allow MNCs to best control these factors. Despite the immense range of suggested solutions made available, these difficulties remain a steadfast force that managers must consider in every decision made for the company. Whilst the foundation of each individual challenge seemingly differs so greatly from one another, there is a connection between most that can be referred back to cultural difference...
Well known companies like Nike, Microsoft, Sony, Shell Group are just some of the big companies that went global and expanded their trading around the world, they are large businesses that operate internationally in many countries. Development of worldwide integration urges companies to reach out international markets and interact with foreign customers. Businesses focus on fulfilling the demand of the market by its products or services, besides their target is increasing profit, in order achieve these goals they favor to expand their work in a foreign market. Other reasons to internationalize their business may be to become stronger than the other competitors and in addition, to lower their expenses by getting resources they need at lower cost. Recently most of business’s activities are affected by changes that occur globally; this is a result of their operating activities with foreign markets, most of companies’ export goods, move resources with other country and also many companies get suppliers from foreign countries. Likewise these trading activities of businesses outside the country contribute to the growth of the economy.
What differences are there between the global strategy and international strategy? There are three key differences. The first relates to the degree of involvement and coordination from the centre. Coordination of strategic activities is the extent to which a firm’s strategic activities in different country locations are planned and executed interdependently on a global scale to exploit the synergies that exist across different countries. An international strategy does not require strong coordination from the centre. A global strategy, on the other hand, requires significant coordination between the activities of the centre and those of subsidiaries.
As a conclusion international business best described as a Globalization. A globalizing business sector advertises viability through rivalry and the division of the work it permits individuals and economies to keep tabs on what they specialize in. It also allows people to go globally. Globalization has stretched the assets, items, administrations and markets accessible to individuals. The increasing set of reliant connections around individuals from distinctive parts of a world that happens to be separated into countries
Stonehouse, G., Campbell, D., Hamill, J. & Purdie, T. (2004). Global and Transnational Business (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.