Funding is one way that affects the quality of the education system. Schools that enroll students that is from high-income communities supplement more funding for each student than low-income community schools. This means that wealthier children experience education with adequate teachers, with efficient and effective educational literatur... ... middle of paper ... ...m what teachers suggest them to be. Many people around the world believe that education is fundamental to achieving equality and economic opportunity. A high school diploma and a college degree ensure better jobs and higher income.
“In the second part of our study, we analyze whether high VA teachers also improve students’ long-term outcomes. We find that students assigned to higher VA teachers are more successful in many dimensions. They are more likely to attend college, earn higher salaries, live in better neighborhoods, and save more for retirement. They are also less likely to have children as teenagers…replacing a teacher whose estimated VA based on three years of data is in the
That is why kids that are in school now who works hard for superior grades, should be paid for their good grades and hard work for a better incentive and much more. First, paying kids for good grades will make them want to do better and achieve their goals. Students offered cash incentives in the Louisiana program enrolled in more classes, earned more credits, and had a better average than students not in the program. As Borba, a mom of college kids on Today.com exclaims “For some kids who are strugglers, [Cash incentives] would be a way to get them to try a little harder” (Borba 2). If the students were getting paid for good grades, it would make the class additionally appealing, because they know they will get a reward if they do well.
One of the opportunities we can provide for those children is school choice. Some people argue that they pay high tax to provide quality education for their children, and others do not have the right to share with it. If we follow the system thinking, this belief is a fallacy because we can not separate one from others in a system. In the long run, school choice can create success for children from the low SES family. In other words, if we can help those children succeed in the school and society, they will produce less problems to the society, and we can build up a better environment for everyone.
With a better educational foundation kids may have the chance to become more successful in their personal and business lives. Which begs the questions, do students with higher socioeconomic backgrounds perform better in school than students below the poverty line or socioeconomic threshold and why is this happening? In order to successfully analyze we need to establish a base line as we would be comparing those below the poverty line to those above it. We can then break it down into classes such as the middle class and upper class to get a better understanding. Now there are many ways in which the socioeconomics of a family can help their student learn.
With an increase in life expectancy, parents tend to choose to educate their children to more advanced levels. The parents also know that what benefits would each child get from schooling investments over a long working life and, with fewer children in a family; they can devote more time and money to each child. The result of this educational investment is that the labor force as a whole becomes more productive, promoting higher wages and a better standard of living. Women and men are being educated for longer, therefore tend to enter the workforce later, but they are likely to be more productive once they start working. All these mechanisms are heavily dependent on the policy environment.
More recently even though grants are available for students from low income families they are still put off by the high costs. From a different perspective sociologists such as douglas and sugarman provide support for the cultural deprivation theory, which states that the work... ... middle of paper ... ...rtain knowledge is privileged. As their culture is closer to that of the school they are more likely to succeed. A similar view is expresses by diane reay who studied social capital and concluded that it is mothers who have the main influence on their childs education. This is because middle class mothers have more cultural capital and material capital- they have more qualifications and information about how the educational system worked.
The more money a student can pay, the better education they most likely will receive. Unfortunately, students who want an education and are actually striving to maintain a better life do not get the best education due to financial hardships. Some colleges can help pay for the lower income students to get in however, that just means they will owe more money later on in life. Children need to depend on a good education; therefore, they will obtain a brighter future because “Education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Today it is a principal inst... ... middle of paper ... ...ome inequality compared to France and the U.K., but after adding the taxes, the United States had the second-highest level of inequality.
It is something that society must take into consideration. In the terms of social class, the higher ups or wealthy people are at a better standing than those who are struggling financially. Because they are pretty much going to college and majoring in their work field and climb the ladder of success with ease because of a helping hand from their parent who provided them that future. However, those who are poor in education can also be in college and be in the same level of the higher social classes. Education in my opinion is very important and it should not be lessoned due to saving money for other unnecessary things.
A well-educated parent can have a better understanding of raising children and molding them for their adult life. For instance, an educated parent will probably make higher wages, therefore are able to invest more money in their child’s welfare. (Kaushal, 2014). Parents that raise their children in an impoverished environment most likely won’t have the money which, could decrease their chances of procuring the resources needed for their child’s education. Kaushal, (2014) stated, “Children learn from the attitudes and behaviors of their parents, which are often informed by knowledge, acquired through education” (Introduction, para.