Importance Of Stop And Search

914 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Intro to law Reasonable suspicion

Stop and Search

This essay will critically discuss the importance of police ethics in relation to stop and search. Police ethics explained in dictionaries are a set of principles of right conduct, a theory or a system of moral values, the rules or standards governing the conduct of a persons or members of a profession. As a police officer you are holding a higher standard than the public is. You take an oath to protect and serve and part of your duties as an offices is to be above reproach on duty and off duty. All 43 police forces in UK have rules for officers to regulate what you can and cannot do as an officers. This regulations in essence is to protect the police force and the responsibilities as a police officer you must be aware of …show more content…

The Police has many laws which gives them power stop and search, however the most frequently used are those under section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 47 of Firearms Act 1968 and sections 44(1) and 44(2) of Terrorism Act 2000, section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and section 23 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. Vehicles they might be stopped under section 163 Road Traffic Act 1988 and search under section 4 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act …show more content…

This use of power has no minimum requirement of suspicion. However section 4 PACE it authorises the police officers to search vehicles where is a reasonable ground of suspicion, that in the vehicle is carrying a person who has committed an offence or is about to commit an offence other than a road traffic offence. The vehicles can be also held or detained to search. Ones the vehicle has been stopped, section 1 PACE comes into play where the power of search on reasonable suspicion is that there are stolen of prohibited articles into vehicle or the driver has consumed alcohol or there is a reasonable suspicion the officer can conduct a breath test. The mix of laws section 163 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and section 4 PACE it gives the police the power to stop vehicles randomly and without suspicion in order to prevent an imminent breach of the

Show More
Related

  • The Stop and Frisk Program within New York City Police Department

    1527 Words  | 4 Pages

    The New York City Police Department enacted a stop and frisk program was enacted to ensure the safety of pedestrians and the safety of the entire city. Stop and frisk is a practice which police officers stop and question hundreds of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband. Those who are found to be carrying any weapons or illegal substances are placed under arrest, taken to the station for booking, and if needed given a summons to appear in front of a judge at a later date. The NYPD’s rules for stop and frisk are based on the United States Supreme Courts decision in Terry v. Ohio. The ruling in Terry v. Ohio held that search and seizure, under the Fourth Amendment, is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. If the police officer has a “reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime” and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous”, an arrest is justified (Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, at 30).

    Read More

  • Essay On Reasonable Suspicion

    667 Words  | 2 Pages

    Reasonable suspicion constitutes a stop by police. According to our textbook, the Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures, which is why is it important for police to justly stop a person (p. 17). The exclusionary rule states that any evidence obtained from improper police work, like an unwarranted stop, is not allowed in court.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Stop And Frisk

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stop-and-frisk is a crime prevention action that allows a police officer to stop and frisk a pedestrian without probable cause to arrest, if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime (Stop and Frisk). It was first approved by the Supreme Court in 1968 after the case Terry v. Ohio, which was considered as a landmark decision. The purpose was to reduce the number of crimes and limited use of firearms; but after several years of implementation, it has faced so many oppositions from the people, and did not really get the positive results.

    Read More

  • A Warrant for Rottman's Arrest by Germany

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    Section 17(5) had abolished common law powers to enter premises for an arrest but said nothing for search and seizure. Power of search was under S18 and S32 and neither had a provision to abolish common law powers. Common law powers still applied in extraditable cases only. Since S18 and 19 were framed to deal with domestic abuses it was clear that Parliament wanted to restrict itself to domestic offences. There was no evidence that Parliament intended to extend PACE to include extraditable offences.

    Read More

  • Stop And Search Powers Analysis

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a wide range of legislation available that serves to govern the police’s use of statutory stop and search powers. Below I will briefly outline the powers each legislation provides the police with, before commenting on how these powers fight criminal activity within the United Kingdom. It is important to note that despite the wide range of legislation available to legitimise the stop and search powers of police, the Police and Criminal Evidence’s 1984 Code A of practice is the main legislation that collectively regulates stop and searches conducted by police constables in the United Kingdom. Additionally, I will also briefly outline the pieces of legislation relating to Terrorism in the United Kingdom.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk

    1282 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stop and frisk has encountered many opponents who think this tool is discriminatory and often targets minorities, specifically black and Hispanic people. For that reason, a federal judge ruled to use this practice more judicious after hundreds of complains against the police department. However, the community is calling back for stop and frisk since they have noticed that it is a necessary practice to keep a safe city. Thus, the problem regarding is the increase of violence in New York City due to the restriction and less use of stop and frisk.

    Read More

  • Motion To Suppress Scenarios

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper is analyzing two scenarios and the motion to suppress rule. An explanation of Motion to Suppress rule will be given, for each scenario. This paper will clarify the approach that police officers will take and the method that officers use their power. Additionally, referencing court cases and supporting evidence with legal citations for the reaction stated (AIU, 2016).

    Read More

  • Lilly Featherstone Case Study

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    PACE s 2 and Code A explains that the officer must state his name, his police station and purpose for the search, the police officers in this case have inform her the reason for this search, however, they have not told her their names and station which is considered to be unlawful. The street search must be just outer clothing which the officer have conducted successfully, but they did not take a record of the search which they must do immediately and ask her if she wants the copy of it.

    Read More

  • Balancing Public Safety with Civil Liberties: A Police Perspective

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Police can misuse the law by following someone around that may cause them to get nervous even if they’re not guilty of anything mess up. Which this should be wrong to do because its taking away their freedom of action. Although might just be doing their routine drive around checkup but if you follow someone to their house. That seems really unfair and more less seen as harassment in most cases but can be seen as protecting the public. For making sure the person is going around looking for houses to break in or to steal from

    Read More

  • Impaired Driving Ethics

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, motorists are often detained and questioned when they have not displayed any signs of impaired driving. Some people point out that this practice of finding any pretext by which to detain a motorist contributes to racial profiling, but the practice is also used frequently to investigate a suspected DUI incident.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Search And Seizures In Law Enforcement

    316 Words  | 1 Pages

    Law enforcement has to know the boundaries of the law due to being bound by departmental rules, local, state, and federal laws (Hall, 2015). Law enforcement agencies should be fully aware of laws that have changed. The body of law known as Search and Seizure is forceful at its own argument. It is always undergoing some type of modification or revision. This law is vital due to it is governed as a right to privacy and the right to freedom from arbitrary invasion under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Hall, 2015). Citizens have more rights than they are afforded under the Fourth Amendment alone. Courts should not defer to the police when a question of public safety is an issue in a search. Search and seizure restrict law

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice System Eyewitness

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Searching – An arresting officer while searching a suspect should always look for weapons or any dangerous items. If the person is unconscious or incapacitated, the officer should look for a medical necklace or

    Read More

  • Civil Rights Vs. Civil Liberties

    1171 Words  | 3 Pages

    Let’s say police suspect someone, and they did a GPS surveillance on that person’s vehicle without their understanding. To search anybody’s personal property without their consent is like a breaking into their personal property unlawfully. Supreme court also considers and validates a police officer having a search warrant before they perform GPS surveillance on anyone’s vehicle.

    Read More

  • Sir Robert Peel's Principles Of Policing Essay

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    These principles play a major role in modern day policing. Principle number one is extremely important and very true, the basic reason that police exists is to prevent crime and to maintain order, this is a fact that will continue to be for years to come and it will never change. This is a role that the police have been playing and will continue to play with years to come this is something that will never change because no matter how much people, technology, or times change the main focuses and goal for the police will continue to be the

    Read More

  • Hot Pursuit Essay Examples

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    You can not confirm an offence as summary or indictable, without having investigated or detained and arrested the person. Therefore, police deserve the right to enter a private residence without a warrant to identify what the situation really is. For example, speeding is considered a summary offence - something that necessarily wouldn’t be regarded as serious enough to persistently pursue. But, if that suspect was speeding because they are fleeing from a hit and run, you wouldn’t be able to confirm that without detaining them - which you might need the hot pursuit laws to do so. Therefore, a police officer’s rights when in hot pursuit should be adjusted so they have the power to asses a situation for what it really

    Read More

More about Importance Of Stop And Search

Open Document