The Importance Of Oppression Or Demography?

1499 Words3 Pages

Oppression or Demography? Throughout the years females have undergone tremendous amounts of oppression. From our limited roles in society, to our confinements at home, we were seen nothing more than the lesser sex. Compared to males we were the inferior gender, in terms of knowledge, physicality, and stature. Now, one would ask why? What logical reason would make sense to explain this kind of thinking. Most feminists would argue it’s due to misogyny; the hatred of women. Looking through all of history, is it accurate enough to say that the oppression that females have undergone is the result of hatred. The answer that I would like to argue is no. I won’t exclude the idea that there may have been some hate, but to say the limited roles and …show more content…

According to Mr. Dorans’ lecture on women “How Racist were the Greeks and Romans?”, he emphasized with such high mortality rates, females were expected to have from 6 to 9 children, and with each child, she was expected to nurse for up two years. So from the moment a baby is born, to the time they can actually take care of themselves, the child would have to be physically attached to the mom for most of the time, as Mr. Doran explained. With that said, it’s no wonder females were not really acknowledged to do anything else, because they spent most of their time with their children, in addition to caring for the household and working in the fields. If females wanted to join the military they would have to abandon their motherly roles and devote their time to training. More less if they even wanted any time to themselves they would have to hire a nursemaid to care for their children, since there would be at least a minimum of 6 children to look after. But the fact that only elite could afford nursemaids, and the majority of females could, not, most found no time. Even though people would see this as sexist, females found respect and societal status through raising children that would serve society. Due to demographics, there was pride in raising a …show more content…

In fact there is evidence in the 1st century BC of Priene, a woman named Phyle became the first woman in office as a crown bearer, who also paid for a cistern to store water, and water pipes for the city( “A Woman in politics: Phyle, Wife of Thessalos”, page 227). In addition there was evidence of a female philosopher named Hipparchia from the city of Maroneia, a female doctor and midwife named Phanostrate, from Athens in the 4th century BC, and a harpist named Polygnota from Delphi in 86 B.C. ( “A Woman Philosopher: The Life of Hipparchia” page 227; “ A Professional Women: Phanostrate, Midwife and Doctor”, page 227; “ A Professional Woman: The Theban Harpist Polygnota, Daughter of Socrates”, page 228). In addition there have been discovered letters dated back from 90-120 AD, which were actually birthday invitations from an officer 's wife named Claudia Severa to her friends and sister . With these sources, one can’t conclude that females had no other roles in the ancient world. Although a majority of women were forced into the life bearing kids and just caring for the household, because that was the ideal role that was given to them and there was no other role to look up to, not all females were restricted that life. Females like Phyle and Phanostrate were both married and in addition was a doctor, or politician. Also, the

Open Document