Merit is an integral component which maintains the social balance of the society and plays a supporting role in letting the society to function in the right direction. Merit has vanished now a days from society and probably continues to lose its value especially in underdeveloped countries like Pakistan. One of the primary success features of the developed countries is their established and accountable system for everyone, regardless of social status and designation. Merit is not restricted just to a particular field of life, it is a broad term that refers to the supremacy of social equilibrium in all disciplines. In developing countries like Pakistan, where majority of people are suffering from malnutrition simply because they cannot afford …show more content…
This provokes the intense thought of the problem which emphasizes the issue of getting our masses literate about their rights. It is not going to happen with a wishing wand in days or months as change and revolution requires proper, directed struggle which ultimately becomes a fruit bearer for the generations to come. There is a famous saying that you have to work within the system to change it for the betterment of the society. Many have made attempts to improve the society in this aspect but failed as they were discouraged or humiliated by the critics and this way, their struggles lost charm and …show more content…
In this case, Sharukh Jatoi along with three other alleged partners committed the brutal murder of an innocent teenager who unlike them did not belong to an elite family. This case took different turns to show the immunity for elites and loopholes of system for poor and mediocre. Shahrukh Jatoi left the country immediately after committing the crime and the acting judge asked the Police department to bring the convict back to the country. Shahrukh got arrested in Dubai and was brought back in Pakistan. Later, the unfortunate judicial system of Pakistan which is the travesty for the system started and the prosecutor had to part away from his posts and underwent a transfer after which a favorite appointee was brought as a prosecutor who was more inclined towards declaring Sharukh Jatoi as a juvenile. After failed attempts and extreme media pressure, the charges were pressed against the murderers. Then began the negotiations in between the two families, although it was believed to be biased and being influenced by the Jatoi’s. Masses believe that the Khan’s were forcefully asked to make deal ‘Diyat’. (Sahoutara, 2015). Once again, merit was viciously wrecked and the system’s biasness was unveiled. This case is one among hundreds of the examples of failed attempts to seek justice and equilibrium in society on the basis of merit. Merit will continue to lose if the struggle to strive for it is not undertaken in the right
Steve Bogira, a prizewinning writer, spent a year observing Chicago's Cook County Criminal Courthouse. The author focuses on two main issues, the death penalty and innocent defendants who are getting convicted by the pressure of plea bargains, which will be the focus of this review. The book tells many different stories that are told by defendants, prosecutors, a judge, clerks, and jurors; all the people who are being affected and contributing to the miscarriage of justice in today’s courtrooms.
In the article “The Interview” and the documentary “The Central Park Five” both showed injustice and how corrupted the judicial system is in terms of the human experience. Having justice is having equality for all and being fair about it, but in the “The Interview” and “The Central Park Five” it showed the opposite of what having justice is. They proved that the judicial system can be unfair and that innocent people can be arrested for crimes they did not commit even if there are evidence proving their innocence.
In the United States, a form of Meritocracy is employed. This system recognizes and corrects the socioeconomic disadvantages (Arora). While efforts have been made to correct the problem, many still fall flat. Many schools, for example, are not equal and some are even getting worse. Lee County School District, a district that boasted no 'F' and 'D' level schools in 2010, now have three failing schools and eight 'D' levels. The number of 'A' level schools have also fallen from 60 in 2011 to 36 in 2013 (LCPS).
Political systems and their consequent removals during this time serve as a flashing indicator towards the power that exists in the mobilization of the people. The Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, and the Rights of Man and Citizen, serve as reminders of the revolutionary philosophical and political attitudes belonging to the writers of these revolutionary documents. Even now, the same attitudes of equality and freedom can be seen. Whether it be through movements for racial equality on school campuses, justice for those killed unjustly, or the prevailing ideals of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” for all races and genders, the resounding calls for people to support and affirm their brethren continue to echo (US
Many things contribute to the corruption of our justice system. Within the past five years, through police brutality the United States has shown how tainted it really is. In Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson argues that because of family history, misunderstanding youth, and background, our justice system is defined by error. His many points and examples give exceptional proof to his findings. While the government has made some changes over the years for the justice system subjects such as the incarceration of minors and police and laws within the system still need adjusting.
The case of the Central Park jogger is a very controversial topic but many important aspects show that the case in its entirety was very biased and corrupted, which was made even more clearly years after when Matias Reyes confessed to the crime. Especially during the 1990s, when crime in New York City had peaked and the entire justice system felt as though their hands were tied. Statistics had shown that around thirty six people were murdered each week in New York City during 1989. In this case, many young minorities were brought in for the attempted murder and rape of Trisha Meili, but only five eventually confessed and were found guilty. Antron, Yusef, Korey, Kevin, and Raymond were convicted of this crime solely based off their confessions even though they had no other evidence that placed them at the crime. There were many aspects to the confessions that didn’t always match up to the actual crime. Despite the boys’ inevitable outcome, there were many factors that contributed
In order for one to understand the criminal justice system, it is important to study both the criminal law of one’s own country as well as surrounding countries. By engaging in comparative criminal justice studies, one can expand this knowledge through the discovery of similarities and differences in the structure of criminal justice agencies of various nations or states. There are a multitude of factors which could contribute to the differences in each nation’s criminal justice system. By studying the ways in which other countries operate their criminal justice system, it may be possible to learn ways in which we could better our own system. In order to do this, we can study the ways in which various court systems operate around the world. In doing so, we will examine countries with both a different and similar judicial system to ours and discover the differences in how each operates. In furtherance of understanding the criminal justice system, we will
Honor killings are acts of retribution, frequently causing death. These acts are often committed by the male family members against female family members. Victims of honour killings are believed to have brought dishonor or shame upon the family. In 2007, a study by Dr. Amin Muhammad and his colleague, Dr. Sujay Patel of Memorial University, Canada, researched how the tradition of honor killings was brought to Canada The report highlighted that ‘’When people come and settle in Canada they can bring their traditions and forcefully follow them. In some cultures, people feel some boundaries are never to be crossed, and if someone would violate those practices or go against it, then killing is justified to them’’ (Leaders-Post, 2007). The Shafia family homicide is a perfect example of culture crisis leading to crime. The tragic murders really emphasize all the key aspects of how two cultures
“Murder is unique in that it abolishes the party it injures, so that society has to take the place of the victim and on his behalf demand atonement or grant forgiveness; it is the one crime in which society had a direct interest.” - W.H.Auden. Serial, a weekly podcast brings to light a murder from 1999 and it’s safe to say that society has an interest in this case. With over 60 million downloads, the story of 17 years old high school student Adnan Syed being convicted for murder is the subject of many debates; guilty or not guilty. This case -like many others- has copious amounts inconsistencies and uncertainties. Finding the truth about what went down on that January day seems unlikely and absurd. Sarah Koenig (the host) published 12 episodes in the
In this paper I will be analyzing two trials, the O.J. Simpson trial and the Oscar Pistorius trial. The O.J. Simpson trial by jury was conducted in California, while Oscar Pistorius’s trial by judge was conducted in South Africa. Both criminal cases dealt with high profile athletes whom were accused of murder. Public opinion on both cases disagreed with the final verdict. In order to fully understand if one system is more effective in reaching the goal of justice. We must look at how judges are selected in each system as well as how criminal cases are conducted in each geographical area. In California, the defendant was found not guilty by a jury, while in South Africa the defendant was found guilty by the judge. I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a court trial and a trial by judge. In the context of the O.J. Simpson trial and the Oscar Pistorius trial, we are left with one question is one system more efficient in reaching justice?
Does meritocracy still exist in America? Are many talented people who have worked hard throughout their lives going to get deserving rewards and promotions? Does the word meritocracy invented by Michael Young in 1958 still make sense to all of us? Many people still think that meritocracy exists in America because America is the land of opportunities. However, meritocracy does not really exist in America because many hard working people still do not have adequate benefits for their lives and an uncertain future.
Guidelines and principles are set out as ideals, but these are easily subject to discretion, prejudice and errors at any stage (Greene and Heilbrun, 2011). The due process model aims to safeguard the defendant at each stage within the process. However, the conflicting crime control model encourages policing and guilty verdicts, whatever the repercussions (Newburn, 2007). This contest is marked throughout the CJS, “...the more we learn about the Is of the criminal process, the more we are instructed about its Ought,” (Packer, 1968, p. 150). For example, few suspects receive proficient legal defence, yet this is a contradiction to the ideological proviso. It may be interesting to research if juries have experienced and recognised any unfairness within trials. Too often the ideologies of criminal justice, due process and crime control result in miscarriages of justice (Newburn, 2007). When rigid regulatory processes result in bureaucracy, this can only cause more drain on
Throughout history, men have been given power solely because of their gender. In society, men receive benefits, rights, and authority, not based on character or eligibility, but on their physical characteristics and life is inherently easier if one is male. Women have just gained the right to vote within the past decade, while men have always been allowed the privilege of contributing to government and civilization. Also, men had the advantage of being in control of wealth and property for hundreds of years because that is how society always functioned. The foundations of society were built on a patriarchy. Therefore, the value of male characteristics and the importance of men have been passed along and are still present today. While society progresses in understanding equality as years go by, male privilege is still in action
The world’s economies continue to be divided on by whom their means of production benefit, supply, enrich, and protect. Many debates and altercations have been a result of disagreements between capitalists and socialists. Socialists believe the government is essential in providing equality for all and the allocation of capital goods. But the strength of capitalism can be attributed to an incentive structure based upon the three P’s: (1) prices determined by market forces, (2) a profit-and-loss system of accounting and (3) private property rights. The failure of socialism can be traced to its neglect of these three incentive-enhancing components. (Perry) Socialism gives power to the government to regulate the goods produced, the amount of goods produced, where the goods are distributed, and the price of the goods. This command system does not allow for the creativity, wealth, and freedom that capitalism supplies the citizens. Capitalism provides a market system that permits companies to regulate the economies themselves. Capitalism offers the world’s economy the freedom to manage itself, diversify, prosper, fail, and freedom from regulation in order to supply the world based on demand and creativity. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer, and the factory worker. (Thomson) Capitalism is the world’s dominant economic system. Within it, the means of production and distribution are owned by individuals: private ownership and free enterprise are believed to lead to more efficiency, lower prices, be...
The intertwining of sets of human rights needs to be the reality when enjoying rights; those who don’t have the basic/positive rights of education cannot take part in political rights or exercise rights such as freedom of expression. On the other hand situations in developing countries such as famine are less likely to occur when there is the ability to exercise political rights and the right to vote. The international community along with experts and academia need to put forward debates on and bring new ideas to the conversation of the interlacing of civil and political and social and economic rights to dissolve this false dichotomy that are putting limits and constraints on the protections of individuals.