Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Freedom of expression vs speech
Freedom of the media
Freedom of the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Freedom of expression vs speech
Defined as a characteristic of one human’s natural rights, media freedom is the freedom of expressing one’s individuality through various electronic devices and published materials. In order for a government to demonstrate a commitment to express media freedom, it must optimize its performance on freedom of expression and belief, organization bodies and economic privileges (Millennium Challenge Corporation). Moreover, a government’s political regime needs to measure the quality of electoral procedures, political involvement, government corruption, and government transparency. Since December 1993, the General Assembly of the UN has established the World Press Freedom Day to remind the international community to preserve and to declare that media freedom is humans’ most precious rights. In honorary, the World Press Freedom Day also reminds the media professionals who have risked or lost their lives in their course of duty (Yassine Imrani). The only UN agency authorized to defend the rights of freedom of expression, the United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) expanded the topic on highlighting amongst the main problems of every world freedom press and feels that press freedom should be of every human being’s duty as it is a key to all kinds of human and democratic rights (Rebecca Capuano). Within these problems, there is correlation attributed towards media freedom and the different aspects of a country’s development, economy, governance, and citizen sustainability. The Centre for Peace and Human Security was able to assess this valid correlation within three mechanisms (Press freedom and development). The first coordinates that media freedom acts as an arbitrator for individuals and governments in th... ... middle of paper ... ... there were countless violations against media activists where they were killed directly or even tortured to death (IAmSyria.org). Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR) then declared the need for fast action responses for civil society organizations and for medical treatment. Overall, having media freedom allocates for a better and more organized government. For the countries that have media freedom, there is better political stability and an absence of violence; on the other hand, countries that don’t tolerate media freedom express the opposing view and are conflicted with human rights problems. Countries with those problems have a negative correlation that sequels poor media freedom and an oppressive government. In contrast, countries without those problems have a positive correlation that corresponds to the measures of allowing media freedom and great governance.
If we do not expose our youth to the evils in the world then how do they know right from wrong when they run into it? If we do not show them what effects drugs, sex, and violence can have on them then they will not know what is the harm in those things. If we show a kid, on TV a person that got shot and the sadness it brings to that person?s family or other love ones then they will be more likely feel sadden themselves, or at least angered by the gunman.
First, the role of the media is to represent the public and intervene between the public and the government. The media is a mirror, which re...
The media censorship appears in various forms and in almost all countries; few have legal systems that guarantee absolute freedom of the media.
Civil Rights were rights guaranteed by the bill of rights, and the rights of citizens to political, social equality and social freedom. The rights were also established by the 13th and 14th amendments. There were so many civil rights leaders in history. Civil rights leaders wanted to get their message across the nation fast. Media was one of the ways that helped get their message across the nation. Media can be associated with so many things. Media could be a newspaper or a magazine. Media could also be a television or a radio. Media had a huge impact on the whole civil rights movement in so many different ways. The media helped develop Civil Rights in the United States by allowing people to view discrimination first hand, and attracted people to the Civil Rights Movement.
Today, Americans are evenly divided over if media is bad for democracy or if it promotes democracy. Therefore, statistically media is not good or no bad is in the middle based on the public viewing, but do researchers prove that media is in the middle? Therefore I take my stands to prove that media is bad for democracy using research and data which is provided by various sources.
According to Dahl, this criterion emphasizes that citizens must have the equal and effective opportunities to learn about politics surrounding them (1998, 38). The goal of enlightened understanding is to ensure that citizens can make the best decisions that serve their interests. Analyzing freedom of press is an effective indicator to measure enlightened understanding because media is the best medium that citizens could access to learn about what is going on in their government. Without freedom of press, freedom of expression of journalists and scholars are violated and thus, they might encounter difficulties in reporting about politics. Although India has the Right to Information Act, which assures the promotion of "transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority," it is not being enforced enough (2005, 1). According to a research, India 's press status is evaluated as "partly free" (Freedom House, 2014). Furthermore, the press status of India 's score stands at 39 out of 100, where 0 represents the freest status and 100 represents the least free status (Sinha, 2014). In the World Press Freedom Index, India was ranked as the 140th out of 180 countries in terms of freedom of media (Reporters Without Borders ,
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
Every human possesses some guaranteed basic freedoms and rights, whether it is the freedom of speech, or the freedom to express themselves. However, the government seems to be increasingly determined to limit these freedoms using censorship to confine these rights that we usually take for granted. The most important facet of media in general is that it allows people to express themselves freely. In fact, this freedom of expression that music allows us is one of the primary reasons why it exists. Sadly, many of the current artists have forgotten that, but nonetheless, censorship seems to always be there to limit the expression of those who choose to place deeper messages in their songs. Tackling censorship is much more important than it appears to be at the surface; to take down censorship would help preserve the expression of thought. It would help preserve the right to listen to the unaltered forms of everything. Most importantly, it would help preserve the rapidly weakening basic right of speech.
Press freedom takes influential place in a country. It represents citizen's freedom of speech and the right to know. Media can expose news without obstructor or any controls by government and organizations. There should not be control over the press and press freedom is necessary for regulation the growth of corruption, development of economy and maintenance of democracy.
Censorship has been around since B.C. times and originated in Rome. Censorship was enforced to protect our society by not allowing explicit content to be viewed in the media. It also protects child pornography and secret government information leaks. The problem is in some cases are hard to determine on what should be censored because even though something might be explicit content it portrays the point the publisher is trying to make. On the flip some people believe that these extreme crime scenes seen in media have caused people to commit these crimes in real life. Although the article, Broadcast Decency Rules delivers a somewhat convincing and effective argument, I disagree that the media should be censored.
Malcolm X, a human rights activist, once said, “The media´s the most powerful entity on Earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and the guilty innocent, and that´s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” Through numerous studies and considerable amount of research, it has become clear that the media has a significant effect on society and its perception. This applies to all topics, but mostly to issues that are difficult for the mass to experience for themselves. For example, our views of government and social institutions are largely based on the medium’s reports, not our own experiences.
People are using media to show the entire world the truth. Politicians are also using the media to make themselves look better and using Black PR to humiliate their opponents. In countries with communist or monarchy regime media is not an armed method to control people.
India has the largest democracy in the world and media has a powerful presence in the country. In recent times, Indian media has been subject to a lot of criticism for the manner in which they have disregarded their social responsibility. Dangerous business practices in the field of media have affected the fabric of Indian democracy. Big industrial conglomerates in the business of media have threatened the existence of pluralistic viewpoints. Post liberalisation, transnational media organisations have spread their wings in the Indian market with their own global interests. This has happened at the cost of an Indian media which was initially thought to be an agent of ushering in social change through developmental programs directed at the non-privileged and marginalised sections of the society. Though media has at times successfully played the role of a watchdog of the government functionaries and has also aided in participatory
Media Censorship Today there is much controversy over whether there should or shouldn’t be censorship of the media. Censorship should not be imposed on citizens by the government or other agencies; adults have a right to view or listen to what they choose. Additionally, if children’s media is censored, parents are the ones who should monitor and regulate it. Parents should be the ones to monitor children’s viewing of television and also what they hear on the radio, CD’s, and tapes.
The power of media lies in its functions, as it can be illustrated by realizing its political power. Media is the cementing force of democracy, because it has supplemented the authority of people by giving them awareness about political system and its functioning. And this is the reason for which media is considered the fourth pillar of state. It strives for the rights of citizens to be served. In short, proper functioning of media is pre requisite for democracy.