Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How important is style important in leadership
The importance of leadership style
The importance of leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How important is style important in leadership
LEADERSHIP STYLES BEFORE AND DURING EVENT:
Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it. (Eisenhower, 2015)
As it was rightly pointed out leadership is an art of getting things done in the right time and in the right way. It was fascinating to see people develop their skills and leadership style in the past 9 weeks. I got a chance to observe, analyze, and predict the different styles of leadership portrayed by a single individual. It was quiet evident that each individual showed a change in the leadership styles as the time went by and we were getting near to the D-day. With a lot of confidence I could say that the leadership styles displayed by individuals could be categorized into
…show more content…
In this nature our project manager was a democratic leader. She made sure that she took in everybody’s idea into consideration and then come to an end decision. As a democratic leader she had the whole responsibility of taming all the strong personalities and make sure all the other could also voice their opinion. Our project manager always used the right tools like the Gantt chart, agendas and minutes to guide us to the right path and help us achieve the required result. But whereas the same leadership style did not work with a few people in the group as they had to be told bluntly what to be done, as they were not ready to take orders or requests. In this matter our project manager was missing some of the autocratic style in her leading the group. As in few places where the project manager could not be firm the group started losing motivation because of those other people who did not complete their tasks as per requirement. Looking at this event it also taught us that in real world we would have staff like these who do not know work and how to handle those kinds of situations. Constant criticizing would demoralize the team so rather we need to come up with an alternative …show more content…
The reason behind this was because the stress level was very low and they did not have any time frames to complete tasks, even if any they were not getting done in time, as nobody wanted to take the responsibility. This is when as a project manager had to step in but even that did not happen. Although this kind of leadership encourages bonding between the team members its still a risky style of leadership as each member would do what he or she wants but not what the event wants. A lesson learnt here is even if there is nothing much to do or finish we sill need to have control of our group and make sure there is no laissez faire style but at least democratic all through the period and everybody take some or the other responsibilities and finish all the tasks in time.
CONCLUSION:
With everything taken into account, my respect and perspective towards hospitality industry has changed. Lesson learnt all through the process here is that there is more work behind the scenes than what is seen by the eyes. Along with that it was one of the best experiences working with my fellow students and achieve a high and professional standard. This event has taught me a lot of important things like:
• The importance of planning.
• Using a Gantt chart to achieve the required
The topic of leadership has been explored and written about by thousands of authors who are considerably more qualified than I am to write about the subject. However, I’ve always maintained that developing, evolving and articulating one’s own leadership philosophy is an essential part of a professional’s growth. Through academics and experience, I’ve concluded that leadership is a “soft” skill, more art than science, and that leadership principles can be universally applied. As a topic of discussion, leadership can be ambiguous and seldom does everyone agree on a single definition. Organizations and the people they consist of crave leadership, even if not overtly. Undeniably, strong leadership is essential to achieving
Leadership is portrayed at its pinnacle in William Bratton’s Turnaround, Rudolph Giuliani’s book Leadership, Oren Harari’s book The Leadership Secrets of Colin Powell, and David Lipsky’s book Absolutely American: Four Years at West Point. In each of these works, the author does an exceptional job of depicting the various traits and characteristics necessary for being a powerful and effective leader.
Leadership is about taking personal and social responsibility for working with others to achieve common goals.
There are a variety of ways to define both leader and leadership. There is not, however, a clear definition of how to become one. There is no set list of mandatory traits, either innate or learned, that a person must embody to be considered successful or proved a failure. What I feel it takes is the right mix of strengths and weaknesses in a given situation to demonstrate effectiveness. No one person has abilities without accompanying deficiencies. It’s all in the way they are balanced. The balance in the way one uses his or hers’ abilities will ultimately determine the type of leadership one has throughout time. To support these claims I will examine a well-known leader throughout the military, General James “Mad Dog” Mattis. This essay will provide some insight into both his strengths and weaknesses while discussing some personality traits he is said to possess.
You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink is a proverb I have heard since I was young. Leadership is the skill of influencing people to accomplish goals (Huber, 2014). In today’s world with policy and technological changes the leaders must use their leadership skills to not only get the horse to the water, have him drink, but also do it with a smile an invite others to join him. Leaders use a variety of styles to accomplish their goals. I will discuss the leadership style that I utilize most often, how my style relates to leadership theories and the work type environment it is most useful in.
Throughout 2016, many different people will claim they can lead America to greatness again just as they do each election year. This directs attention towards leadership, and most Americans simply trust that these potential candidates display leadership characteristics. Unfortunately, politicians don’t always exemplify leadership, and many Americans experience poor leaders daily such as dreadful bosses. Because of these commonplace experiences, leadership may not appear as a direct character trait. Adaptable communication, the ability to inspire, a clear passion, and professional attitudes all characterize a true leader.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Great leaders are few and far between, but everyone possesses the power to be a good leader. I have only been in the military for about three and a half years; most of this time has been spent at CMR St-Jean and RMCC. I have yet to be put into any major leadership roles, but from what I have been able to accomplish in regards to leading others and the leaders that I have been able observe over the last few years, I have started to slowly figure out what type of leader I would like to become. According to Johns and Saks (2014) leadership is, “The influence that particular individuals exert on the goal achievement of others in an organizational context” (206). From past experience, influencing others to do something can be complicated at times but can be accomplished by staying focused on the task at hand. The leadership roles I have been able to take part in have brought me to the conclusion that cohesion is the core factor of how I lead.
Our team did really well with making sure everyone’s ideas were heard, but conversations with another team, who did not successfully complete the simulation, was because one or two people took the lead, and other group members were hesitant to speak up. Compared to other teams, our team managed group thinks effectively. One other team saved more money than us when they completed the challenge, which confirms the assumption we should not have made in trying to implement as many tasks as we did. Every team had challenges with time constraint which was due to a number of factors such as: brand new teams, unclear instructions, and a drop in team morale when the system gave negative feedback at a wrong task. While the successes and challenges were magnified because we were living the experience, and outside observer would have a difference of
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
...d to be used as the only line of communication. This is because face-to-face communication is necessary to provide a direct interpretation of what is being said along with immediate clarification of misunderstandings. With that in mind, group messaging should be used as a supplementary form of communication for the smaller tasks associated with a project. The second issue was the way the team leader dealt with the setback in the project. Regardless of the situation, an individual should not introduce hostility into a working relationship. In this case, the team leader’s inability to assess the situation and jumping to conclusion led to the team member feeling disrespected and less willing to work with the team leader. This situation just highlights the concept of reducing communication barriers as they can build up and cause unneeded tension directly and indirectly.
I understand that managing people is a small part of successful project management, however managing people ineffectively can really derail a project. In order to avoid individuals who are ineffective during a project or cause division throughout the team, project managers need to coach and support his or her team members. (Hall, H. 2016) This is why I have learned from this course that communication approach is vital to the project and having a prompt, appropriate response to your team is important to their success as well. During the simulation scenarios each time the team was met with an issue they had an emotional reaction. It became very clear if I did not manage those insecurities and stress, the morale was a huge factor in having the ability to move forward. All the pieces to the project management puzzle are valid, although the people who make the pieces of the puzzle are the most important part of project management. There is always going to be uncertainty and speed bumps throughout the project lifecycle, but communication and managing people is as important as the pieces of the puzzle that I bullet pointed
Leadership has been described as a “complex process having multiple dimensions” (Northouse, 2013). Over the past 60 years, scholars and practitioners have introduced a vast amount of leadership models and theories to explain this complex field and examine its many perspectives. Numerous leadership theories and models have attempted to define what makes a leader effective. From the early 1900s, the trait paradigm dominated leadership literature, focusing on inherited traits of leaders and suggesting that “leaders are born, not made”. However, during the 1950s, the trait approach lost enthusiasm as focus shifted to the behavior of leaders. Similar to the trait theory, the behavioral paradigm was based on general effective leadership behaviors
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
Great leadership is not achieved over night, and it is not something that one achieves and stops. Great leaders spend entire lives building and growing their leadership skills. It is not likely that a leader will one day wake up with all of the vision, influence, knowledge, respect, and momentum necessary to be great; these take time to develop. “It is the capacity to develop and improve their skills that distinguishes leaders from their followers.”