Schools need to focus on producing not only smart kids, but healthy ones as well. Kids rely on their schools to provide them with a nutritional meal, but often times are given unhealthy meals that lead to the obesity epidemic. Therefore, junk food should be banned in schools. There is no avoiding junk food advertisements because it shows up on social media, TVs, radios, vending machines, billboards, logos, etc. Companies spend on average $148 million a year on advertising in schools in commercials, equipment, vending machines, and rewards programs.
According to Schanzenbach (2008), students who eat school lunches are more likely to be obese than those who eat lunches packed at home (p.685). This is so because parents control what their child is eating. Schools should not allow children to be able to purchase unhealthy foods and instead should be promoting healthier options. According to a report pertaining ... ... middle of paper ... ...les of the youth in America when there are so many adverse factors compelling children to have poor physical exercise and nutrition. Works Cited Kubik , M. K., Story , M. S., & Davey, C. D. (2007).
The majority of foods in the schools around the United States are junk food. The food a child consumes at a school is usually fattening and can lead to diseases mentioned before. Another problem with a child not eating properly is not receiving the vitamins and minerals he/ she desires. A change that was made to provide healthy lunches is to give the students one cup of fruits and a decent meal size. Schuna has done research as to why the lunches are a major health concern and she discusses ways to resolve and/ or prevent these health issues.
Also, according to “Healthy Day Consumer News,” schools and parents should be working together to improve the school nutrition, In other words, the teachers and parents should teach the kids about living a healthy lifestyle. Many parents and faculty members believe that schools should have improvements in the systems for healthy food. According to the article, “Why are schools selling junk foods to kids” it states American students suffering over obesity in schools. In other words, reasons for the obesities is because of vending machines and junk food on campuses. Having junk food is a win-win situation because we, the students get to eat the junk food, and the school is getting money to fund the school.
Overall, school districts that implemented stricter food policies experienced a decrease of childhood obesity which is backed up by multiple studies. Healthier lunch options in schools are on the rise but it is a slow moving progression. Obesity is still a fast growing problem in the United States. One of the best and simplest things that individuals can do is bring their own lunch to school. The brown bag lunch is shown to be much healthier than eating in school cafeterias.
The main issue is if food is nutritious enough, and NSLP is connected to not having enough nutrients in their food. This lead to many states, implying for more nutrient filled meals and beverages that meet the school guidelines. All schools have a certain amount they can spend because of the budget plan they have. So changes can’t be made instantly, but have to be voted on by Congress. The main thing that has to address is how they improve the quality of their Assignment 4 food so it can fit school budgets.
Childhood obesity has increased dramatically in the U.S. over the last several decades. With children being more obese at younger ages, this could cause longer term health issues and academic issues (“School Meals”, 2012). With these programs, students can improve their food choices, body weight, and school performance. Also with these programs, lower income families can get free or discounted meals from schools. Children from families with incomes between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty line are eligible for reduced lunches, meaning that they cannot be charged more than 40 cents for a meal (“School Meals”, 2012).
In a poll given to fourteen Saint James students, 92% of students said that their parents would most likely buy the healthier school options over packing a lunch/buying the old school lunches. Healthier school lunch options can help many parents out with something as simple as getting rid of the hassle of packing a
These numbers are consistent with the Mayo Clinic’s recommendations ( Kuczynski-Brown). The main goal of cutting calories and taking away junk food, was to insure that kids are getting served a healthy lunch. At each lunch, schools must still provide a cup of fruit, a cup of vegetables, two servings of grains, two ounces of dairy, and a cup of fluid milk, so that students can get their needed vitamins and nutrients (Anonymous) . They are also wanting more local farmers to be involved, and give more of the food they grow to the school. At the high school I went to, we built a green house, and planted a garden to give us some local grown food.
Because of this the CPAG found that “in 2005 food banks reported the greatest increase in the number of people seeking help coming from working families”. For those who genuinely can’t afford to provide their children with nutritional breakfasts, Breakfast in Schools is the perfect solution to their children going to school hungry having a negative impact on their grades. “There is now a substantial body of research showing breakfast consumption contributes to a students academic and school attendance” (Rampersaud 2005). However there could be some families that would abuse this concept. They could not feed their children breakfast with the knowledge that there is a nutrition... ... middle of paper ... ... by the CPAG, shows that “the reasoning is simple: hungry children do not learn- feeding them improves their attendance, nutritional status and academic performance and behaviour”.