Yes, all good actions and things have something in common. The word “Holiness” comes in many forms. It can take a religious interpretation and humanistic interpretation. Being honest with people can be supported in both contexts: religious and humanistic interpretation because being an honest person gives people hope and faith and these two factors lead people to do good deeds. Financing someone’s education is another good action. Therefore, both being an honest person in a community and financing someone’s education are good actions and the common thing about these two actions are holiness. Human beings are social creatures who can differentiate good things from evil things. There is a common thing in all good deeds and that is holiness. Holiness …show more content…
Another common factor for good deeds are God(s) because God(s) is the one who created the phrase: good deed. Of course, God(s) who is the creator of all universe love to see human beings happy. Holiness is always the good things and deeds that is an important factor in everyday life which make people happy. On the other hand, God(s) always wants to see human beings be kind to each other and help each other in everyday life in order to promote month by month, year by year, and century by century. Furthermore, the phenomena holiness is created by God(s) to maintain the structure of how human beings should live obviously in a better way. To be clearer, God(s) willing are to see human beings become more educated, civilized, and grow as time passes, Hence, God(s) created many factors to help human beings believe in themselves and eventually believe in the existence of God(s). Holiness is also one of the characteristics of God(s) by which they can be named holy. This also means that holiness is the essence of God(s) because holiness is something without sin and God(s) deserves to be called holy. If there was not God(s), therefore, there would not be holiness because they are the creator of the word holiness. In contrary, if there was no such thing like holiness, there would be always the absence of good actions and things. The world would look very scary for all mankind and the future …show more content…
For example, worshiping a cow is a good deed in Indian culture at the same time it is the right thing in their religious regulation while it is a sin and the same time a wrong thing in the context of Islam. In addition, all people around the world has a mutual respect to each other’s thoughts and believes because that is what make a human special from other creatures. Worshiping a cow is holiness both in the religious context of India and ethical context, respecting each other faiths and ideology is always a good deed and a right thing to do because one cannot force others to convert to from his or her faith to another or one cannot insult a religion because it has its own fundamentals and basics throughout the years and centuries. Becoming educated is a common thing in all almost all religion because the world is changing and people are changing with it and this is the holiness and the right thing in every single society in the world. On the other hand, if the very first century is compared to the current century, there are big positive potential impacts and changes in societies and peoples because it is again education. Education is considered as a holy and the most necessary duty to be done by people. Being responsible, honest, and kind to oneself and others is a good example of good actions and the right thing in most of the communities around the world because this is humans’ principles to have
The morals of society concept is exemplified by the Judeo-Christian religions. These religions base their moral principles on their respective religious texts that they believe to contain God’s will.
As we develop a closer relationship with Christ we are to end up more mindful of His Holiness.
In his thought-provoking book, “The Pursuit of Holiness,” Jerry Bridges offers a personal look on what it means to be holy like Christ. The book is scripture backed and covers all areas of holiness as a Christian. In the book, Bridges starts off with assessing just what holiness is. To be holy is to be morally blameless and to have no sin (p. 15). Holiness is being separated from the ways of the world and becoming more like Christ. To be holy does not mean that you obey a set of rules, but is instead string to do always do what is pleasing in the eyes of the Lord. In Romans chapter 12 verses 1 and 2, Paul challenges the people to give up their bodies as a holy sacrifice for kingdom work. He continues on saying that this is truly
In Western society and culture, religion and morality have often intertwined and they have reflected their values onto each other. Today it is sometimes impossible to make a distinction between the two, since their influence has transcended generations. In modern Western culture, religion and society preach conformity. In order to be a “good” person, one must conform to the values imposed by the church1 and state.
In Christian theology charity is the greatest of the three theological virtues. Charity is held to be the ultimate perfection of the human spirit because it is said to both glorify and reflect the nature of God. Bible also says “Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since charity shall cover the multitude of sins”
Giving to the homeless, assisting an elderly woman across the street, and conducting oneself with integrity are all examples of moral acts. Often we consider doing nice things for our family and friends, or going out of our way to help someone in need a “Good Samaritan” act. However, benevolence and moral adherence are only a few of the qualifications necessary for a belief in God and good morality. A moral is defined as, “pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical” (Dictionary.com). “Objective morality” is our society’s way of signifying that some behaviors are right (honesty, kindness, patience) and some behaviors are wrong (stealing, racism, abuse). We are told by our parents, from atheists, and in holiday songs to be “good for goodness sake,” but is that the only reason we have to be good? Many people were taught, and expected, from a young age to uphold integrity and morality because it is right. Most religious people disagree with morality deprived of God and believe that a person can only be good with God, but it is indeed possible for people to be good without the knowledge of God. I contend that humans can be lacking religion and still know the concept of right or wrong, and that morality can exist independent from God.
McDonald (2007) mentioned, “good” deeds done by men should not be labeled “virtuous sins” (p. 166). Although man’s acts are viewed as “the acts of a sinner, not all his acts are sinful acts” (McDonald, 2007, p. 166). For example, a woman who decided to give to those in need, regardless of the pressure to do otherwise, must not be labeled sinful. This is just an...
Some people think that the religion is God-given and flexible for all times, but the other see it as traditions that change with time. Folkways can change to mores which are habits and traditions that are used to make moral judgments. Sumner believes that sometimes mores and folkways can be harmful and dangerous (24). Therefore, a person may think that what was right for ancestors may not be right these days now. Thus, most religions’ main goal is advocating to have good morals. Some believers feel that to have morals, they should follow their religion’s commandments. Additionally, thinking that there is an afterlife, which is the Day of Judgment and heaven and hell, morality becomes more desirable. Some religions teach that this life, which we are living right now, is nothing but a test for your morals and how much you successfully followed the required commandants. A person is evaluated by his actions and they are ones that determine one’s place in heaven or hell in the afterlife. As a result, people act morally for the benefit of their
Aristotle develops his virtue ethics by first considering ends and goods. He claims that “every action and decision, seems to seek some good” (Shafer-Landau 2013, 615). Aristotle states that we pursue certain things because of the benefits it brings itself and other consequences it may bring. Aristotle suggests that this is the same for goodness. We must pursue what is good for good itself and for any other benefits it may bring. Furthermore, Aristotle suggests that through pursuing the good, we are able to determine the best way of life (Shafer-Landau 2013, 615).
such that it is so closely tied to the virtuous activity in which a good life consists?
The human phenomena of conscience and the instinctive concepts of respect and consideration are only a few of the positive qualities that have helped shape complex cultures with all the many different belief systems throughout the world. Every different society in the world has different laws and rules that guide the behavior of their members.
The transmission of religion and faith has survived through various different cultures and societies. Religion and faith have both evolved either into more branches or a completely different ideology or thought process. These new creations of branches or new ideologies change the course of thinking and provide new outlooks on life. For instance, baptisms in Christianity mean a “salvation” and rite of passage to follow in the footsteps of God while in the Islamic religion a baptism is closely correlated with a Wudu, which prepares Muslims for worship at any time to Allah. What these examples show are that people strictly follow “obligations” in order to fulfill their religious ideology. Religion, in my opinion, is confined too strictly to regulations and a process that is not externalized to an individual. The conception of faith is more personalized than religious practices with the open mind and “free-lancer” aspects.
When you take a trip half way around the world, the values are totally different. The Eastern religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, to name a few, practice very different beliefs. They are more centered on love thy neighbor than the Christian Religion. This is not to say that Christians are wrong or act wrongfully, it just says that the difference in beliefs generates a significant difference in society. Here in America, our society claims we should love thy neighbor, but it tends to depend on who the neighbor is. We want our neighbors to be just like us. If they are not, then it becomes more difficult to show compassion. The Eastern religions practice compassion for all people, no matter who or what they are. In America, compassion is scarce. It's predominant in families and in small towns, but in the larger cities, it is hard to see if it exists at all. A movie has been made illustrating this point. It is called "Falling Down". It is about a man who has come to the end of his rope. He is tired of the way society has treated him, and he begins to fight back. He thinks he is doing the right thing, but he finally comes to realize that to do the right thing you can't think only of yourself.
Sometimes religion defines what is good or wrong. For a Christian religion supports people should love one another. Therefore, it influences people to understand the importance of staying together. In addition, other religions define the value and framework that helps in identifying what is bad or right. They teach the concepts of good thoughts and deeds in the society. The structures are defined in relevant resources like holy books such Quran and the Bible. In other groups, morality and religion are inseparable because moral behaviors are parts of their beliefs. Religious leaders act as an example to the members of the community. Also, some religious families where the forefathers were morally upright, individuals in the same background tend to support good morals (Doetzel
“All of morals comes down to the virtues.” (Keenan, 142) Keenan asserts that these virtues are the cardinal virtues, consisting of courage, temperance, justice, and prudence, and date back to Aristotle in Ancient Greece. The word cardinal is derived from the root, cardo, meaning hinge. Simply stated, the Christian moral life hinges on the cardinal virtues. Keenan suggests an updating of the cardinal virtues to become justice, fidelity, self-care, and prudence. He provides reasoning for the new virtue list. He defines each virtue with its social implications. For example, individuals should seek to set up society with equal justice for all persons. These descriptions help the Christian understand when the virtues are best applicable to self and/or others. Thomas Aquinas adds three theological virtues to the mix: faith, hope, and charity. Familiar from the thirteenth chapter of I Corinthians, these virtues seek to help Christian theologians through the ages maintain the integrity of the Gospel and continue to make it relevant in the modern world. Keenan recounts Bernard of Clairvaux’s beliefs that cultivating the virtues is a way to assimilate with the humanity of Jesus. (Keenan, 136) According to Aquinas, “Every human action is a moral action.” (Keenan, 142) The purpose of the virtues is to guide Christians, and when the Christian studies and applies the virtues to his life, his actions will demonstrate morality. The Bible heralds in Proverbs 3:32, “Devious people are detestable to the Lord, but the virtuous are his close