Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
human impact on environment activity
human activities affects on the environment
human activities affects on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: human impact on environment activity
Footprint is a measurement for sustainability and unsustainability based on consumption of resources on goods and activities made by humans. It is a relevant measurement in sustainability since its balance depends on natural resources which is crucial for humanity (Moore, 2011). Footprint analysis can be done on different scales: individual, regional, national and global, depending which areas are considered in the analysis. If the footprint exceeds biocapacity at the global scale, it means that people are using more than can be regenerated (Moore, 2011). According to the Figure 1, it appears that the lifestyle of people in Western countries causes a larger footprint (more than 5 hectares per capita) than the developing countries, whose footprint …show more content…
It shows the ecological impact due to human activities in terms of land area which is required to afford these activities. Defining the ecological impact, the amount of raw materials used and carbon dioxide emitted are considered and converted. The capacity is an estimated amount of land and water required to supply these resources or store the wastes created (Moore, 2011). The special feature of the Footprint analysis is that all human activities related to resources and environment is compact into a single dimension (Moffatt, …show more content…
In contrast with the Ecological footprint, Carbon footprint takes in account a supply chain or the life-cycle of a product, not measuring area. It analysis eight categories: construction, shelter, food, clothing, mobility, manufactured products, services, and trade (Hertwich & Peter, 2009). Activities which cause direct emissions are using car and heating, meantime indirect occurs during generation of electricity and production of goods and services (Wiedmann & Minx, 2008). Depending on methodology, Carbon footprint stands mostly for gaseous emissions that are relevant to climate change and associated with human production or consumption activities (Wiedmann & Minx, 2008). However, there is no general rule which gaseous emissions must be considered either procedure for quantifying and units for Carbon footprint are not
footprint is the total amount of greenhouse gases that is emitted over the full life of a process. Although it is called the carbon
The ecological footprint is a mathematical tool that was developed by Doctor Mathis Wackernagel and Professor William Rees in 1992 to calculate how many hectares of land or acres of land are required to support one human being. Humans use up the planets’ natural resources to survive on a daily basis. These resources include fish, forests, land, water, and other agricultural products. In an aspect, we can think of humans as parasites to the planet Earth because it is our host and we need its resources to survive. Within the means of the ecological footprint, we want to look closely as the production of Earth’s resources, against the consumption rate of the human race. We can think of the ecological foot print analysis as an approach to a global
Sustainable living to reduce your personal footprint (n.d.). In WWF Global. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from
If everyone lived like me, we will need 2.2 Planet Earths to provide enough resources, as we can see below. An average person living in Ontario needs 3.58 Planet Earths.
Carbon footprint can be defined as the amount of greenhouse gases an individual produces at a time through diverse activities. A person’s carbon footprint is the sum of all emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), which were induced by an individual’s daily activities for a given time frame. CO2 is one of the many greenhouse gases that are responsible for causing global warming which we are currently experiencing today. Carbon footprint is an extremely powerful tool which we can utilize to understand the impact that our personal activities have on global warming.
Human Footprint was a documentary about how much average Americans will consume throughout their lives. It covered everything from the diapers a child will wear to the amount of houses and cars a person will own in their lifetime. It gave the average amount consumed by each American in their lifetime, meaning some will use more of one thing, while others will use less. Certain items such as the amount of appliances and the types of food we eat were a great example of something that people probably did not realize had a huge effect on the world. While this gave great information about how much Americans really consume, it did little to address these problems. In fact, it seemed at times that they were not problems at all. The documentarian assumed that people watching would think consumption was a problem, but I am not sure that is the case with a majority of people. Another problem was the amount of time they wasted panning over the inflated amount of items consumed. Finally, they failed to challenge the viewer to change their lifestyle in even the most generically simple ways, such as using less when the opportunity comes.
Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, particularly from industrial production, to combat global climate change is one of the biggest sustainable development challenge for the international community. Countries are adopting Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs), low carbon development strategies and climate change policies to tackle issues of climate change and at the same time meet their development goals. At the global level, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and Kyoto Protocol, have paved ways for voluntary GHG emission reduction targets. To facilitate the mitigation actions, carbon intensities of production process are tracked and GHG inventories are developed. Such accounting of GHGs is a common practice in developed countries and is increasingly being adopted in developing countries as well. However, need for an internationally acceptable standardized and comparable GHG accounting and reporting was felt necessary that lead to the establishment of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol), which has developed protocols, standards and guidelines for the objective.
A personal ecological footprint, also known as an eco-footprint, is the demand that an individual person puts on the Earth’s natural resources; such as land, ocean, and the waste that the individual produces. A person’s consumption of the Earth’s resources and how that individual impacts the earth help to create a personal eco-footprint calculation. At http://myfootprint.org/, I calculated my personal ecological footprint and discovered my impact on the Earth’s resources and its ecosystem. The ecological footprint quiz results were that if everyone on the planet lived my lifestyle we would need 3.86 Earth’s to sustain the world’s population.
My ecological footprint is 4.4 Earths to provide enough resources for the population. It would use 19.4 global acres to support resource productivity. It would produce 19.6 tons of carbon dioxide.
There is no hesitation when it comes to whether humans impact the global environment. However, it is questioned in whether human’s ecological footprint is either negatively or positively impacting. In clear perspective, humans share from both sides and their ecological footprint is noted towards whether it will benefit or harm the environment around them. Topics such as overpopulation, pollution, biomagnification, and deforestation are all human impacted and can harm the environment, but some include benefits into helping the world around us with solutions to their problems.
Every day the world around us is changing ever so slightly in many different ways. Humans can affect the environment through our day to day lifestyle without even noticing the change. An ecological footprint is a measurement of how much a person uses the environment around them to live their life. This given measurement can help one to see their impact on the earth. It is an important tool to understand what actually a human does to change the habitat near them. My ecological footprint results gave me a perspective of how my daily life can impact the world I live in, as well as, how I as an individual can change my actions to make less waste on earth. It is also useful for each person to know their own ecological footprint since no one live
The Time for Change Organisation, best defines the term “carbon footprint” as “The total amount of greenhouse gases produced to directly and indirectly support human activities, usually expressed in equivalent tons of carbon dioxide (CO2).”
Carrying capacity is defined as how many organisms can survive sustainably in a certain region without destroying the resources. There are many limiting factors, such as shelter, abundance of food and water, predation, and many different factors can be the constraint that will determine the human carrying capacity. Human carrying capacity is the amount of people that can live on earth without destroying its future. Given the rapid population growth of Earth and our current failure to meet the simple basic needs of most of the world’s population, the human carrying capacity has become a serious concern. Earth could support a lot more people living a simple country lifestyle than an American suburban one. One degree that has been developed to evaluate carrying capacity on Earth is the ecological footprint, which shows each person individual share.
Though several people see large rapidly growing populations in developing regions as the primary culprit in environmental decline, we need to focus on the costly environmental outcomes of overconsumption among the gradually increasing populations of the developed nations. These differing emphases naturally point to fundamentally different solutions: slow population increase in less-developed nations or change destructive consumption and production patterns in the more-developed nations. This debate, however, assumes a one-step answer to the complex problems created by population pressures on the environment. Both population size and consumption ...
There is no doubt that human activity is having a significant impact on our environment. These environmental impacts include depleting our natural resources, air and water pollution, climate change, destruction of habitats, and loss of biodiversity. Because of these growing concerns, we need to learn how to live sustainably. Living sustainably will allow us to conserve our limited resources more wisely so they will be available for future generations (Withgott & Brennan, 2011, Chapter 1).