Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Scottsboro trial why it was unfair
Scottsboro trial why it was unfair
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Scottsboro trial why it was unfair
Due Process is a broad and vague guarantee of fair procedure in deciding cases; the fifth and fourth amendment provisions prohibiting the federal government and the states, respectively, from depriving citizens of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.(joel Samaha). Due Process has a very big role when it comes to the public view point because the system seems fair concerning the legitimacy of the law and the courts. As stated by (Meyer Grant, 2003) “perception of fairness or unfairness reflect concern with the process of justice as well the outcome”. Throughout this research paper one can get a better understanding of Due Process, and analyze some …show more content…
Alabama case. The “Scottsboro boys” were accused of raping two white women in 1931. Seven white boys came into a railroad station in Alabama and told the stationmaster that a bunch of Negros” had picked a fight with them and thrown them off a freight train. When the train went to Scottsboro, the posse rounded up nine black boys and two white girls. As the deputy was tying up the boys one of the white girls told the sheriff that the boys had raped her and her friend. Alabama officials hurried through the legal proceedings. A total of three trails took one day and all nine boys were sentenced to death. Liberals, radicals, and Communists around the country rallied to the defense of the “Scottsboro boys.” This case violates the due process clause because the defendants were not given reasonable time and opportunity to secure counsel in their defense. Another significant case to Due Process is Brown V. Mississippi. In 1943 , March 30 The Sheriffs took Yank Ellington, a young black man, to a dead white man’s house and accused this black man of killing him. When he denied to killing the man the sheriffs hung him by rope to the limb of a tree, let him down, hung him again, and let him down a second time. The Ellington still claimed his innocence so the sheriffs tied him to a tree and whipped him. When he continued to refuse demands to confess they finally released him. A …show more content…
Alabama case along with Brown V. Mississippi, established what came to be called the fundamental fairness doctrine of due process. According to the fundamental fairness doctrine due process is a command to the states to provide two basic fair trails. The two basic fair trails are; Notice to defendants of the charges against them and a hearing on the facts before convicting and punishing defendants. The Doctrine is left up to individual states to determine the specifics of notice and
One of the benefits of due process is demonstrated in the Belshaw case. The inquisitorial system of justice is based on crime control; the Swiss police had a hard time in Canada with Mr. Belshaw, because of his right to due process, under Canadian law. Both systems of justice share common beliefs, for example, they both look for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In Canada we fight about facts and laws, where-as the inquisitorial system searches for the facts. The adversarial system has a separation of powers with the police, crown, defense, and the judge. It is quite different for the inquisitorial system of justice, the police do the arrest, then they present the facts to crown, which then decide if they have a case and turn over the evidence to the judge. The only problem is that the judge decides what will lead them to the truth. How any evidence was collected is irrelevant. In due process if the police obtain evidence and violate the law or a persons charter of rights and freedoms the judge will exclude the evidence from the hearing, even if it would help or prove that the person is guilty. These two systems of justice are generated in democratic traditions.
(1) Based on case law from Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, the Supreme Court held that the essentials of due process must be followed. The first holding given by the Supreme Court involved the indirect issue of due process. The Supreme Court held that in juvenile court proceedings the juvenile must be treated fairly and be given the essentials of due process.
Adair v. U.S. and Coppage v. Kansas became two defining cases in the Lochner era, a period defined after the Supreme Court’s decision in Lochner v New York, where the court adopted a broad understanding of the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment. In these cases the court used the substantive due process principle to determine whether a state statute or state’s policing power violated an individual’s freedom of contract. To gain a better understanding of the court’s reasoning it is essential to understand what they disregarded and how the rulings relate to the rulings in Plessy v. Ferguson, Lochner v. New York and Muller v. Oregon.
“ROOSEVELT IS ASKED TO INTERVENE TO PROTECT SCOTTSBORO NEGROES: Warning of 'Massacre' of Seven Prisoners and Their Lawyers at Decatur (Ala.) Court Today, Defense Counsel Wire President a Plea to Obtain State Troops” (Linder), reads a headline from the New York Times on November 20, 1933. The nine Scottsboro boys accused of rape and their attorneys were scared to death, but the government did not seem to acknowledge their danger. The article also mentions Patterson’s previous trial where “Circuit Judge Horton, presiding, took judicial notice of incipient mob action to lynch defendants and attorneys by ordering soldiers in open court to shoot if necessary to preserve the peace” (Linder).
3. The court stated: "We conclude that when the ground for asserting privilege as to subpoenaed materials sought for use in criminal trial is based only on the generalized interest in confidentiality, it cannot prevail over the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of justice. The generalized assertion of privilege must yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial.
The two models of crime that have been opposing each other for years are the due process model and the crime control model. The due process model is the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. ( Answers.Com) Any person that is charged with a crime is required to have their rights protected by the criminal justice system under the due process model. The crime control model for law enforcement is based on the assumption of absolute reliability of police fact-finding, treats arrestees as if they are already found guilty. (Crime control model) This paper will compare and contrast the role that the due process and crime control models have on shaping criminal procedure policy.
Civilrights.org. (2002, April 13). Justice on trial. Washington, DC: Leadership Conference on Civil Rights/Leadership Conference on Civil RightsEducation Fund. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from Civilrights.org Web site: http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/cj/
The Motion for a New Trial requests that the Court determine whether the Government violated the Nanda Defendants’ Fifth Amendment Right to Due Process by introducing false evidence or withholding material evidence at trial to warrant the Court to grant the motion for a new trial.
From the moment an innocent individual enters the criminal justice system they are pressured by law enforcement whose main objective is to obtain a conviction. Some police interrogation tactics have been characterized as explicit violations of the suspect’s right to due process (Campbell and Denov 2004). However, this is just the beginning. Additional forms of suffering under police custody include assaults,
When Lee was six years old one of the nations most notorious trials was taking place, the Scottsboro Trials. “On March 25, 1931, a freight train was stopped in Paint Rock, a tiny community in Northern Alabama, and nine young African American men who had been riding the rails were arrested” (Johnson). “Two white women on the train,
The Scottsboro trials occurred on March 25th, 1931. On trial were nine falsely accused black boys who had been the accused rapists of two white women. Similarly, In To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson, a black man, was tried for the rape of a young white woman, Mayella Ewell. In both trials the men were found guilty and sentence to life in prison or death.
In 1968, Herbert Packer was a Stanford University law professor who constructed two models of criminal process, due process and crime control. The due process model was Packer’s view that criminal defendants should be presumed innocent, courts must protect suspects’ rights, and there must be come limits placed on police powers. The crime control model is a model that emphasizes law and order and argues that every effort must be made to suppress crime, and to try, convict, and incarcerate offenders. Packer’s crime control model suggested that most cases ended in guilty please or withdrawals. In contrast, his due process model suggested that cases that go to trail and are appealed were the most influential. The due process and crime control model differentiate in
...y (Edkins & Kansas, 2007). However, both crime control and due process models pose immense risks on the society by the fact that they are allowed pre-trial detention. Nevertheless, the restrictions defined by the constitution on the crime control and due process models regarding criminal procedures, help them operate effectively and efficiently to accomplish the desired activities in maintaining fair justice in the society (Zalman, 2008).
Are due process and the courts fair? How fair are the courts? Can they be trusted to give a fair outcome? In the past, our Founding Fathers and ancestors built and fought for this country with their blood, sweat and tears, and this country, its Constitution, and its beliefs were built upon the Bible. Among many new and different ideas in the formation of the government in this new country were branches of government, two political and one judicial. The judicial branch, as you may or may not know, is the Supreme Court of the United States. That, although it is the single judicial branch, is, arguably, the most necessary branch, because it is meant to keep the other political branches in check and answer questions not to be answered by politics.
Great effort has been made in our criminal justice system in pretrial, trial, appeals, writ and clemency procedures to minimize the chance of and innocent person being convicted and sentenced to death. Since 1973, legal protections have been so great that 37 percent of all death row cases have been overturned for due process reasons or commuted. Inmates are six times more likely to get off death row by appeals than by execution.