Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How fair is our justice system
Flaws in the criminal justice system
Essay on the role of a criminologist
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How fair is our justice system
Christie (9) explains that conflicts are important elements in society, that highly industrialized societies have a lack of. He expresses that social systems have to be organized so conflicts are nurtured and visible, and to ensure that professionals do not dominate the handling of them (9). He also thinks we should not have criminology (10). That we should abolish institutes because social consequences of criminology are uncertain (10). He expresses that conflicts have been taken away from the directly involved parties and have disappeared or become other people’s property because of the criminology process (10). That conflicts may hurt individuals and social systems and without necessary officials, private vengeance and vendettas arise (10). …show more content…
In criminology the focus to solving these conflicts is on the crime system and the offender. Christie (10) explains that conflict has been taken away from involved parties and have become another persons property. The offender has been made into an object for study, manipulation and control and, have reduced the victim to a nonentity (Christie 12). I agree with his point that conflict is typically stolen by the state such as lawyers, courts and judges. The offenders and victims are both represented by an appointed lawyer and generally just sit back and watch the conflict and decision unravel before their eyes. This system tries to ensure peace within the society by giving everyone fair, equal and consistent resolution to conflict and ensure a set of shared values and goals are given that support this social order. The state also needs to reduce conflict with this system and to protect the needs of the victim. Christie wants a system where the original parties should participate in their own conflicts and that conflict should be dealt by those parties and not professionals. I think think the system in theory is the best impartial way to resolve conflicts. Through laws, precedents and mandated sentences it is suppose to create justice fair to the victim who was harmed and ensure that this is applied to all citizens of any case. I think that the theory of this system is necessary in society, that crime punishments should be outlined for individuals so that they are all treated equally and that no one is above the law. It is however, very obvious that the system is definitely not perfect. Some sentences people receive in contrast to others are definitely not impartial at all and some offenders are wrongfully convicted because they look guilty when really they could be completely innocent. Andrea Christidis for example was an 18 year old
Hickey, T. J. (2010). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
He explains that when a conflict arises, we are less capable to take on the situation and are more likely to hand it off to authorities. He then comes to the conclusion of how they are overlooked, in terms of importance, and that individuals own their conflicts as one would own property. Furthermore, he justifies that these properties are stolen by law, therefore, no longer owned by individuals. Christie urges the need to eliminate ‘professionals’ from the sphere of conflict resolution in order to prevent the theft of conflicts. He explains his perspective of “conflict as property” as not relating to material compensation but rather to the ownership of conflict itself. He then recognizes the effects of victim losing the “property” originally, and puts forth a fix for this process. He introduces a way to remodel the justice system for dealing with conflicts in which the court is victim
Akers, R, & Sellers, C. (2009). Criminological theories: introduction, evaluation, and application. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
Did you know that in 2014, shoplifting and worker’s theft cost the retail industry a loss of thirty-two billion dollars (Wahba, 2015)? According Wahba “a common misperception about shoplifting is that retailers can ‘afford’ the loss of a candy bar or a pair of jeans” (2015). This type of reasoning certainly does make more sense when explained through the context of a criminological theory. For example according to the Rational Choice theory individuals weigh the costs and benefits associated with a criminal and or deviant act and then make a conscious choice. Other criminological theories explain criminal and deviant behavior using a biological, psychological, social, conflict, or multifactor component. Taking that into consideration in this
Young, J. (1981). Thinking seriously about crime: Some models of criminology. In M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan, & J. Pawson (Eds.), Crime and society: Readings in history and society (pp. 248-309). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., & Cullen, F. T. (2011). Criminological theory: Context and consequences. Los Angeles, CA US: Sage.
The crime and conflict nexus exist and its existence matters because it affects the utility of both organizations making them more lethal. This increase in lethality has a negative affect an international security making it very important. With that, there are still ways in which law enforcement and policy makers can combat this nexus.
Criminological Theory: Past to Present, edited by Cullen, T.F., Agnew, R. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The United States Department of Justice and all inferior law enforcement agencies that is umbrella under this hierarchy is not exempt from conflict. Conflict management derives from historical events that have altered the current perception of conflict management and proposes a resolution method for many areas within the justice system. The conflict model is a primary example of the easiest forms of theoretical approaches to conflict management. Additional examples would include that of the consensus perceptive, the pluralist perspective, conflict perspective and restorative justice theories. Although each provides a certain field within the justice system with a more comprehensive approach, not all are equally beneficial in all areas. It is inevitable that the association of conflict is derived from societal change and perception plus approaches are manipulated accordingly as situations evolve.
Walmart can be studied using structure functional theory and social conflict theories. Social functional theory is the relationships among parts of society and how these parts are functional(have beneficial consequences) or dysfunctional (have negative consequences. Most Americans today love to shop at Walmart because they continue to give consumers the best prices on over 120,000 products and are one stop shopping.
Siegel, L. J. (2008). Critical criminology: It's a class thing. Criminology: The core (pp. 173-196). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Lilly, Robert J., Francis T. Cullen, and Richard A. Ball. 2011. Criminological Theory: Context And Consequences. 5th ed. California: SAGE.
Hickey, T.J. (2010) Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Criminology is the study of crime and criminals; a branch of sociology. More accurately, it is the study of crime as a social trend, and its overall origins, its many manifestations and its impact upon society as a whole. That makes it more a form of sociology than a law enforcement tool. But the trends it studies have a huge impact on the way the police do their jobs, the way society treats its criminals, and the way a given community goes about maintaining law and order. The writer will describe and give examples of the three perspectives of viewing crimes. The perspectives that will be highlighted are the consensus view, the conflict view or the interactionist view. Each perspective maintain its own interpretation of what constitutes criminal activities and what causes people to engage in criminal behaviors (Siegel, p.12).
It can be argued that criminology has helped improved the understanding of crime in the 20th century through the knowledge of preventing criminal behaviour and how society responds to crime after it has been committed. Although, criminologist do not blame people for crimes committed but try to understand why people commits that crime and explain it, instead of blaming them.