Communication and decision making is a big part of everyday business. Fred Luthans writes, “Both communication and decision making are dynamic, personal processes relevant to the social cognitive framework and the study of organizational behavior.” (Luthans, 2011, pg. 259) Communication and decision making are tied together. A person has to be able to interpret different types of communication in order to form a proper decision. Many companies have seen the benefit of people working in teams. They have redefined a number of jobs to be a team atmosphere to solve problems and to make decisions. Furthermore, Tim Barnett writes about the advantages of group decision making, “Group decision-making may also lead to a greater collective understanding of the eventual course of action chosen, since it is possible that many affected by the decision implementation actually had input into the decision.” (Barnett, 2016) A team of people has different perspectives that might be missed if different people are not involved in the process of making decisions. In this paper, I will discuss how diverse creative people, communication, and having a process can help generate more ideas with a group of people involved in decision making. Diversity and Creativity In order to have a group that generate more ideas, the group should be made up of diverse creative people from varying backgrounds. In this day and age, companies need creative people that can …show more content…
Group decision making has become the norm these days at work. There are several ways a group can generate more ideas than an individual by selecting diverse creative people, using open interactive communication, and selecting a process to use to develop a decision. In conclusion, a company will be wise to maintain an environment where their workers are empowered to make innovative decisions that will drive the company into future
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
Diversity of team brings multiple opinions and ultimately quality decisions. As the leader hears the concerns and ideas of all members’ quality decisions are achieved.
Obviously, people differ in numerous ways, so what does that mean for businesses? Well, when work groups are comprised of people with different backgrounds, cultures and lifestyles, promoting teamwork and smooth interactions can be challenging. Finding new ways to work together will require thinking about people’s differences, not to divide, separate or exclude, but to take advantage of those differences. When people engage in divergent thinking, they put themselves in a highly exploratory mode, drawing from more of their total life experience to help solve a particularly difficult problem or to discover new and better alternatives to doing things.
Malcolm ford said that “Diversity: is the art of thinking independently together”[1]. Diversity in teams is vital to achieve effective solution where every team member brings in unique expertise that results in all-inclusive approach for possible solutions. In this process different sets of eyes with unique pair of glasses see the problem and solution differently from one another that creates a wider coverage range. In the article “Putting your whole brain to work”[2] Dorothy Leonard and Susaan Straus discuss about how creative abrasion is necessary for productive results. They talk about how a manager under- stands that different people have different thinking styles: analytical or intuitive, experiential or conceptual, independent or social, logical or values driven. These thinking styles ultimately influence the decision-making abilities of a team. Even though these diverse teams are essential and have many benefits they clearly are prone to dysfunction because of the very reason of their origin i.e. considerable diversity among team members. With all these advantages and limitations of a
...tionship with participants in an effort to further a shared goal. In order to create a climate of collaboration they need to determine and act upon the collective needs of the collaborative team. As mentioned, the first step is building trusting relationships. Trust, after all, is at the core of collaboration and without trusting relationships collaboration could not take place. In the infancy of collaboration leaders need to walk the talk and be the first among the collaborative team to trust. Doing so creates an environment of collective genius because leaders ensure the consideration of alternative viewpoints in discussions. In seeking a diversity of inputs leaders naturally encourage the participation of all members of the collaborative team. This inclusion allows for more creativity and a much more dynamic result. (Kouzes & Posner, 2007, pp. 221-232)
The purpose of creating teams is to solve a problem or issue through the use of diverse ideas and solutions. There are many times in life, whether at work or at school that one will encounter a diverse mix of personalities. Workplace diversity is everywhere, from the small corner business to the fortune 500 company, and is one of the most important challenges facing companies today. This mix of diverse personalities, gender, race, experience, and culture is what makes a team successful. This is an example of a heterogeneous team. On the other hand, a team with the same make-up, or homogeneous, has limitations on creativity, viewpoints and ideas. This paper will look at cultural diversity and demographic characteristics, specifically age, gender, expertise/ experience and how each plays an integral part in the construction of a high performance team.
sender and the other is the receiver. The importance of communication is how the sender expresses
Group decision making has many benefits for the individuals involved and the organization itself. In order for group decision making to be efficient, it is important for a creative environment to exist. “Creativity is the mental and social process used to generate ideas, concepts and associations that lead to the exploration of new ideas (May, 2011, para.3). This allows each employee to explore ideas and feel comfortable to share them without fear of rejection.
Importance of Groups and Group Processes. An organization’s use of teams in the workplace is a common phenomenon in the 21st century. According to Plessis (2012), organizations are increasing their use of team in the quest of improved performance and to meet the challenges of the 21st century. According to Dees (2013), a team consists of a group of interdependent players who perform uniquely valuable functions in order to accomplish the vision and mission. The members of Group 4 were placed
According to Robbins, “Groups generate more complex information and knowledge. By aggregating the resources of several individuals, groups bring more input as well as heterogeneity into the decision process”(Robbins, 2015, p. 262). Group decision provides a greater variety of views. This allows the opportunity to consider other approaches. With group decision there tends to be more accepting the solution. Robbins states, participate of the decision making are more likely to support and motivate others to accept it.(Robbins, 2015, p. 262)
Completing the first five weeks of the course Organizational Behavior, has been interesting. Learning about myself in my behaviors as well as classmates, how to conduct myself in meetings and group interactions, and how to create a better version of myself with stress. The purpose of this paper is to explain group process, synergistic decision making, and reflective thinking process. I will explain each topic with what the term is, why it is important, and how can one apply it to their own life with experiences.
The Importance of Communication & nbsp; I believe that one of my strengths lies in the way I communicate and deal with children. I think that we must become active listeners in order to understand each other. During my internship with the Institute for Social Justice, I worked with inmates on research for alternative social models of punishment. In order to do the job effectively, I needed to empathize with the inmates so that I could understand their concerns and needs and remedy any self-destructive conduct they exhibit. The work also involved an all out hunt on my part to place these inmates into environments and programs that would prove healthy for them. & nbsp ; I maintained a working relationship with my friends at the Institute and checked their progress weekly. I believe that the power to empathize, or the ability to put yourself in someone else's place begins with an open mind. When I say that we must become active listeners in order to understand one another, I mean to say that there are subtle movements in our speech, certain words that we use, certain utterances that are not directed towards us, certain circumstances unrevealed to us. We must endeavor to in my studies in your department. & nbsp;
Indeed some research found that the team diversity have positive impact to decision making. For example, one of the research found that the diversity at educational level can positively influence the decision making and also affected on team performance (Simons). In addition, Dooley and Frywell illustrated that the discussion and argument was associated with quality decision making in U.S. hospital. However, some researches also demonstrated that the diversity in the team can have negative influence on decision making. For example, Sounder () found that, in diversity teams, because of the lots of difference between team members, sometimes its difficult to reach an agreement. Although, sometimes diversity in the team can improve the quality of decision making, it also increase the conflict within the team members, and impede the cooperation
Groupthink is the communications theory that addresses, “ defective decision making on the part of a cohesive decision-making group in which loyalty to real or perceived group norms take precedence over independent, critical judgment” (Redd & Mintz, 2013). The main idea behind the theory of groupthink is that when participants in a group discussion do not want to disrupt the group, they will in turn reframe from suggesting other solutions to a problem. By not contributing other suggestions, better solutions may be overlooked and this leads to poor decision making in general. In order for the best possible solution to be found, participants in the group need to feel like they can ask questions and discuss their own personal opinions and beliefs.
A group can be define as ‘any number of people who (1) interact with one another; (2) are psychologically aware of one another and (3) perceive themselves to be a group’ (Mullins, L, 2007, p.299). Certain task can only be performed by combined effort of a group. Organisation can use groups to carry out projects, which will help to achieve its overall aim. However, for the group to be successful they must understand what is expected of them and have the right skill to complete the task. . (Mullins, L, 2006)