Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
why corporate social responsibility is important
purpose of corporate social responsibility
why corporate social responsibility is important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: why corporate social responsibility is important
Introduction
Modern businesses are having trouble when ensuring that their interests coincide with those of other entities, including citizens, future generations, and the environment among others. Consequently, companies are expected to take direct responsibility for the impact that their operations have on the environment and the society at large. The main principle behind the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is sustainability. Consequently, most of the activities that are covered by CSR are necessary for the survival of the businesses that undertake them. Nowadays, there is an ‘unwritten’ rule that businesses have to pass on their success to the world through CSR. Since the advent of CSR, businesses are forthwith judged in terms of their ability to be good corporate citizens. Businesses that find it hard to fulfill their social
…show more content…
Consequently, companies have discovered that on some occasions, CSR is not just a simple mode of operation but it is also a market strategy. On other occasions, CSR is driven by external factors. For instance, CSR as a strategy can be motivated by “changes in consumer behavior, pressure from shareholders and employees, or by enlightened leadership” (Galbreath, 2009, p. 109). On all occasions, CSR can be successfully used to institute a turn-around in a business. Most CSR corporate strategies are implemented using the top-to-bottom approach. Furthermore, most of these strategies involve practices such as organizational alignments, improved budget allocation, and taking roles that are more central in environmental matters. CSR as a strategy might involve an acknowledgement of the firm’s role in respect to external issues. The chosen strategy must also be considerate of the standards of the actions that are expected from a company that seeks to implement CSR. Management is a key factor in any strategy that depends on
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
In particular, the authors examine the ways in which management may choose the most suitable approach, communicate it in the corporate environment, and address further implementation as a transformational organizational change (Lindgreen & Swaen, 2010). The next stage in this process is to measure the performance of the selected approach through the most contextually suitable indicators that would define the outcomes as positive, negative, or unproductive. Also, it is crucial to remember the importance of the stakeholders, whose expectations and demands are often conflicting. The broader is the corporate net, the more likely it is that stakeholders’ expectations will differ to the point of mutually exclusive contradictions. However, their interests must be taken into account and incorporated in the organizational CSR approach. Finally, the authors discuss how a business case for CSR may be created with corporate interest in
Davis (1960) assert that concept of CSR is important because businesses are based on trust and foresight. This trust with customers, communities and regulators is not simple and to be successful in long run, a company needs to think beyond what is affecting them today. Thus it is necessary to address changes to technology or the needs of customers taking into account alterations in social, environmental and governance issues (Holme 2010). This essay has made an attempt to explore the role a...
Corporate social responsibility is globally defined as operating a business in a way that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. The concern of CSR has drastically increased over the last two decades. It has enhanced interactions between governments, businesses, society and internationally. In the past, businesses primarily focus themselves with the economic results of their decisions. Now, businesses must also reflect on the legal, ethical, moral and social consequences of their decisions. Corporate Social Responsibility is no longer defined by how much money a company contributes to charity, but by its overall involvement in activities that improve the quality of people’s lives.
“Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Holme and Watts (2000) p.8). For many years business have cared solely on money however in recent years businesses have started to take interest in CSR and helping society welfare. This paper will discuss if Corporate Social Responsibility is likely to become a game changer in the near future.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
In subsequent years, European researchers suggested companies should view social responsibility internationally. CSR has become a new alternative in the conception and doing business that encompasses economic, social, and environmental operations for achieving competitive advantage.
Fleming and Jones, in their book, The end of CSR, fundamentally question the existence of Corporate Social Responsibility because they think it ‘never really began’ (Fleming and Jones, 2013). The reason for the authors’ abovementioned stance is highlighted in the quote where they assert that ‘social value is subordinated to economic rationality’ in capitalism (Fleming and Jones, 2013). The current government provisions follow the same logic and try to outsource education, healthcare in order to implement business ontology and maximize profit. They agree with Friedman’s view on capitalism that businesses do not have social responsibilities. Therefore, every action of business is taken to fulfill its ‘sole purpose’ (Friedman). They consider that CSR evolved to pursue the same goal practices, including ‘marketing, branding, recruitment and employee motivation’.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be considered as a concept defining how companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and how they interact with stakeholders on a voluntary basis ([18] EC, 2010). [61] Spence and Bourlakis (2009) argued that the UK Government discourse on CSR focused on voluntary practices rather than government intervention namely that corporate responsibility (CR) is the voluntary actions that an organisation can take, over and above compliance with minimum legal requirements, to address both its own competitive interests and the interests of the wider society(Ibrahim,
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
They should also participate in initiatives that benefit the society (Fallon, 2015). The company should manage their business and conduct their efforts to create a positive impact in the society. This business practice is called corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Popa & Salanta, 2014). "Sustainability isn 't just important for people and the planet, but also is vital for business success," said Maw, consumers are more aware about global social issues today. With that being said, the importance of corporate social responsibility in business has more value than before (Fallon, 2015). Human beings are social animal and we cannot live in isolation. We are expected to behave in a manner that is socially and morally acceptable to others. This also applies to in business; corporates are expected to conduct its operation in a manner that fulfills its obligations to the society (Olivia, 2011). Being socially responsible is not only respecting the legal system, but also going beyond them through environmental management, investing in human capital and having a relationship with all stakeholders (Popa & Salanta, 2014). According to Gond and Moon CSR is associated with business responsibility for society not for the wrong reasons such as compensating for a negative outcome, which is using CSR irresponsible by covering up the “doing good” to “doing bad”. Second, business responsibility to
To understand to broad aspect of CSR, it must be considered for a complex perspective. Therefore Mureşan et al. (2010) states that CSR is the expectation related to the company leading to ecological, economical, legal, ethical and philanthropical responsibility and argues that many people do
The environmental aspect of CSR is defined as the duty to cover the environmental implications of the company’s operations, products and facilities; eliminate waste and emissions; maximize the efficiency and productivity of its resources; and minimize practices that might adversely affect the enjoyment of the country’s resources by future generations. In the emerging global economy, where the Internet, the news media and the information revolution shine light on business practices around the world, companies are more frequently judged on the basis of their environmental stewardship. Partners in business and consumers want to know what is inside a company. This transparency
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its