Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
role of technology in agriculture an industry
Ten importance of agricultural engineering
Ten importance of agricultural engineering
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: role of technology in agriculture an industry
Agricultural technologies play a vital role in economic development process of a given countries via enhancing the agricultural productivity. Technology is defined as a new, scientifically derived, often complex input supplied to farmers by organizations with deep technical expertise. In other word technology is defined as any idea, object or practice that is perceived as new by the member of social systems (Mahajan and Peterson, 1985). The concept of technology could be conceptualized better through understanding the difference between technology adoption and diffusion. Technology adoption is measured at one point in time while technology diffusion is the spread of a new technology across population overtime. Rogers (1983) argues that, innovation …show more content…
Technology diffusion process signifies a group of phenomena, which suggests how an innovation spreads among consumers. It takes place at the individual level and is the mental process that starts when an individual first hears about an innovation and ends to its final adoption or rejection. Roger (1983) summarized the above definition by the following four core elements: (1) the technology that represent the new idea, practice, or object being diffused, (2) communication channels which represent the way information about the new technology flows from change agents’ suppliers (extension, technology suppliers) to final users or farmer. (3) The time period over which a social system adopts a technology and (4) the social system. Overall, the technology diffusion process essentially encompasses the adoption process of several individuals or farmers over time. On the other hand, technology adoption is the use or non-use of a new technology by an individual or farmer at a given period of …show more content…
(1985), adoption can be categorized into individual or aggregate adoption. He defined individual adoption as the degree of use of a new technology in a long-run equilibrium when the farmer has full information about the new technology and it is potential whereas, aggregate adoption defined as the process of spread of a technology within a region. Further, their studies distinguished technologies that are divisible and not divisible. Divisible technology in terms of resource allocation requires the decision process involves area allocations as well as levels of use of rate of application. For instance: improved seed, chemical fertilizer, and herbicide and pesticide. Whereas, technologies that are not divisible in term of resource allocation require how much resource to be allocated to the new and old technologies. For instance: mechanization and irrigation. On the other hand, the intensity of adoption of divisible technologies can be measured at individual or aggregate level in a given period of time by the share of farm area under the new technology or quantity of input used per hectare in relation to the aggregate level of adoption in a region while, the extent of adoption of non-divisible agricultural technologies such as tractors and combine harvesters at the farm level at a given period of time is dichotomous (use or no use), and the aggregate measure becomes
By implementing new farming techniques provided with the new technological advances in machines we can see abundant harvest in even the poorest third world countries. For example, the Green Revolution has already showed admirable progress in the northern part of India ever since it took start in 1950. By 1997, northern India increased its grain production by 37 percent. This has proven that traditional farming methods are being rendered obsolete. And because by the year 2000, there will be half the land per person in developing countries as there was in 1970, we need to apply ultra-efficient methods to sustain the growing need. Not only does the Green Revolution enhances food output, it also preserves the environment.
...o. “The Great Agricultural Transition: Crisis, Change, and Social Consequence of the Twentieth Century US Farming”. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (2001): 103-124.
Every new technology has advantages and disadvantages, aims and limitations. As each new technology is released though, we ourselves weigh up the profit and productivity against the cost and ethical dilemmas. Still, as reserch continues, technological advances will undoubtedly become a huge part of the Australian commercial farming industry. The question is when.
Agriculture has been a part of American life for tens of thousands of years. The modern world today has changed a lot since then thanks to technology and new scientific studies in order to improve the way we see agriculture today. A specific change is a term call biotechnology which is the use of living organisms or other biological systems in the manufacture of drugs or other products or for environmental management, as in waste recycling. Biotechnology has changed agriculture by making plants resistant to certain diseases or to the animal aspect of changing the sex of a cow its just remarkable on how much science has changed and how far its come. Of course everything comes with its good and bad and this is sure a controversy that has gone on forever about its health risks and if its actually healthy for you but it is one part of science that has changed they way we farm and plant crops today.
...ne farmer in the U.S. (“Historical” 76).With a 25 ft self propelled combine, a few trucks, a tractor, a 30 ft drill, and a 35 ft sweep disk it took 3hrs of labor to make 1000 bushels, 3 acres, of wheat. To produce 100 bush of corn , 1 ⅛ acres with a 12 ft combine, a few trucks, a tractor, a 20ft sprayer, a planter, a 20 ft tandem disk, and a 5-btm plow it took 2 ¾ hours of labor in 1987 (“Historical” 78). By 1990 100 people were taken care of by one farmer in the U.S. (“Historical” 80). More and more information technology and precision techniques were being used in agriculture production in the 1990s (“Historical” 81). In 1994 satellite technology was introduced and used on farms more and more. Also the use of low-tillage techniques kept rising (“Historical” 82). In 1997 the first crops that were resistant to weeds and insects was introduced (“Historical” 83).
Quinion, Ann, Paxie W. Chirwa, Festus K. Akinnifesi, and Oluyede C. Ajayi. 2010. Do agroforestry technologies improve the livelihoods of the resource poor farmers? evidence from kasungu and machinga districts of malawi. Agroforestry Systems 80, (3): 457-465, www.summon.com (accessed February 21, 2014).
Tom Urban (1991) was the first to coin the term industrialization of food describing it as: “a process by which consumers wants and needs were fed back into a production and distribution system to provide desired quantity, availability and price” (p. 4). Beginning in the early part of the 20th century agriculture was transformed from a diversified system of small-scale farmers who labored in the field to a complex system of large, technologically-dependent manufacturing of commodity crops like corn and soy (Dimitri, Effland & Conklin, 2005, p. 1). This emerged in response to changes in farm policy and the industrialization of other sectors of society that encourages industry to “get big or get out”.
Agriculture is the biggest industry in the world and home to millions of job opportunities with all jobs leading us to one purpose. Making the world a better place. Over the years agriculture has become bigger, better, and more efficient. With the progression of agriculture technology the agriculture industry has became more improved. Agriculture technology has shaped the face of our country. From the cotton gin to drones agriculture has improved. In this research paper we will take a look at the progression of agriculture technology through the years, and how the progression of agriculture technology has improved American farming has shaped the United States of America.
farmers could now be accessed from all over the country in just a couple of
The agricultural revolution of the nineteenth century was caused by many important factors. Before the revolution, people working in the farms were living entirely on what they could produce. Most farmers were extremely hesitant to make any changes in the methods they had been using for farming mainly because, although the payoff would be fairly large, if it didn't work, the mistakes could cost them their lives (Kagen).
The Industrial Revolution The Industrial Revolution paved way for the development of various innovations that led to increased agricultural output, faster transportation and communication, and better quality of life, which would, in turn, further encouraged the research on and creation of technologies and more efficient systems of knowledge and processes in future periods of time. The outcomes of Industrial Revolution also capacitated urbanization and capitalism (Mack, 2012). The Industrial Revolution has different consequences to societies around the globe. From what historical records show, western countries especially USA and Great Britain benefitted most from the advancements during this time, as they had more resources to allow for the
People have depended on agriculture for years as the primary source of getting food. We have developed all kinds of ways to manipulate nature so what we can produce higher yield crops, more nutritious crops, bigger crops, crops that withstand cold, and farming equipment that allows us to manufacture these crops with relative ease. Why then are there five billion people being malnourished and forty thousand children dying each day from hunger? It seems as though world hunger is more a result of the lack of distributing the food properly than the lack of quantity. agriculture has turned into a high profit business and biotech companies like Monsanto are constantly trying to come up with better and more efficient ways of farming. Are they doing this to try to solve the world hunger crisis, or merely to make a profit?
...earch and extension, rural infrastructure, and market access for small farmers. Rural investments have been sorely neglected in recent decades, and now is the time to reverse this trend. Farmers in many developing countries are operating in an environment of inadequate infrastructure like roads, electricity, and communications; poor soils; lack of storage and processing capacity; and little or no access to agricultural technologies that could increase their profits and improve their livelihoods. Recent unrest over food prices in a number of countries may tempt policymakers to put the interests of urban consumers over those of rural people, including farmers, but this approach would be shortsighted and counterproductive. Given the scale of investment needed, aid donors should also expand development assistance to agriculture, rural services, and science and technology.
From the very earliest anthropologists, up to as recently as a decade ago, many, if not most, anthropologists and archeologists viewed the transition to agriculture as a quick transformation from the hunter-gatherer lifestyle. This paper will give the history and ideas showing as to how agriculture was more likely developed over a long period of time rather than an “overnight” venture. Following this, the paper will separate the origin of agriculture into the origins of different geographical locations giving examples of the paradigm. Discussing methods of research showing that a fast transition is the least likely scenario, that agriculture was slow coming, beginning as merely a supplement to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle then developing into the large scale farming of today.
Agriculture has changed dramatically, especially since the end of World War II. Food and fibre productivity rose due to new technologies, mechanization, increased chemical use, specialization and government policies that favoured maximizing production. These changes allowed fewer farmers with reduced labour demands to produce the majority of the food and fibre.