The Humor of Flannery O'Connor

1837 Words4 Pages

Webster's online dictionary defines humor as "a quality that appeals to a sense of the ludicrous (laughable and/or ridiculous) or incongruous." Incongruity is the very essence of irony. More specifically, irony is "incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the expected result." Flannery O'Connor's works are masterpieces in the art of literary irony, the laughable and ridiculous. The incongruous situations, ridiculous characters, and feelings of superiority that O'Connor creates make up her shocking and extremely effective, if not disturbing, humor. I say "disturbing" because O'Connor's humor, along with humor in general, most often contains the tragic. O'Connor has been quoted as saying, "The comic and the terrible [...] may be opposite sides of the same coin" (Farley 17). Throughout her works, specifically "Good Country People," O'Connor uses her humor to humble and expose the biases of the overly intellectual and spiritually bankrupt.

"Good Country People" starts with the introduction of Mrs. Freeman and Mrs. Hopewell. O'Connor's most blatant humor is found in the revealing of these two characters, a simple humor for simple people. Immediately, the reader begins chuckling at these two from a decided feeling of superiority over them. Their sacred cliches and gossip routine automatically make the reader want to put them both in the category of "good country people," which, in itself, is an ironic title in that it suggests an immediate air of superiority by bothering to judge a class of people that are generally considered to rest somewhere towards the bottom of society's social order. Clinton Throwbridge further supports this notion when he states, "The titles of many of Flannery O'Connor's short stories...

... middle of paper ...

...onic moments in this one story of Flannery O'Connor's, I hope that I have made it clearer how ingenious O'Connor's humor is and how intrinsic and necessary her ironies are to the brilliance of at least this one story. If not, perhaps these last thoughts on irony from Ruthann Johansen will help: "The ironic imagination, the imagination with its eye James-like between mystery (the sacred or transcendental) and matter (daily life), dissolves the division commonly accepted between these two aspects of reality" (121).

O'Connor dissolves the barriers, via irony/humor, that we put up in the name of our own protection against the unknown part of ourselves--that part which we cannot see without being blinded and cannot touch without first being maimed. So, thank you, Flannery O'Connor, for blinding and maiming us, and "Shame on you too!," she says with a wink and a smile.

Open Document