Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
compare the holocaust and rwanda genocide
compare the holocaust and rwanda genocide
compare the holocaust and rwanda genocide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: compare the holocaust and rwanda genocide
The Darfur-Sudan genocide and the Holocaust are just two of the many mass killings of certain groups of people that have taken place all over the world. The Holocaust was the persecution and extermination of Jews, Gypsies, handicapped people and homosexuals (Holocaust). The leader of the Holocaust and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (the Nazis) was Adolf Hitler (Holocaust). He rose to power in Germany in 1933 (Holocaust). Ghettos and concentration camps were set up to isolate all who the Nazis did not qualify as “pure” (Holocaust). The Holocaust took place between1939 to 1945 (“Introduction”). The Darfur-Sudan Genocide began in 2003 and is still going on today (“Darfur Genocide”). A militia of government-supported people called the Janjaweed has been killing and destroying villages of non-Arab people (“Darfur Genocide”). Al-Bashir general of the National Islamic Front has been leading the persecution (“Darfur: A History” 18). The Holocaust and the Darfur-Sudan genocide are similar in that both their countries and leaders had the same economic status and mind set, however they are different in how the United States and other countries’ were involved and the type of war that was going on during them. The Holocaust and the Darfur-Sudan Genocide occurred in countries that were similarly susceptible to the influences of corrupt leaders and political organizations, and weakened by economic downfalls. Adolf Hitler, leader of the Nazis, convinced the nation of Germany to believe that in order to become a stronger country it needed to kill or misplace all who were not what he believed to be “pure” Germans (Holocaust). In the Darfur-Sudan genocide, Al-Bashir, leader of the National Islamic Front, blamed all the country’s prob... ... middle of paper ... ... 13-21. Print. “Darfur Genocide.” World Without Genocide. William Mitchell School of Law, n.d. Web. 16 April 2014. . “Holocaust History.” Holocaust History. Beth Shalom Holocaust Centre, n.d. Web. 16 April 2014. . “Introduction to the Holocaust.” United States Holocaust Museum. United States Holocaust Museum, 10 June 2013. Web. 15 April 2014. . Reeves, Eric, Massimo Calabresi, Sam Dealey, and Stephan Faris. “The Tragedy of Sudan.” Time. Time Inc, 4 Oct. 2004. Web and Print. 15 April 2014. .
The Darfur case however, revealed that both of these strategies are not effective. Responding to the genocide in Darfur, the US officials declared the label genocide to be occurring. Thereafter, a politically civil-society coalition emerged so as to lobby the administration. The net outcome of these two scenarios however was the same in the absence of effective policies that could halt the genocide. The Rwandan genocide has always acted as the point of reference for similar genocides taking place around the world. Since the 2003 crisis in Darfur, a lot of comparisons have been made to Rwandan genocide. Observers have likened the Darfur genocide to what happened in Rwanda and of course giving it two connotations. First, the violence in the western parts of Sudan has been referred to another Rwanda, by basing their arguments on the nature of the violence. Since whatever was happening in Darfur is similar t...
As of March of 2008, a total of 300,000 people have died in Darfur, Sudan due to genocide. That is equivalent to the entire population of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Genocide started back in February of 2003 in Darfur, Sudan. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights defines the liberties set for everyone in the World. Established in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights displays the rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled to. The situation in Darfur, Sudan is known as Genocide, Genocide is defined as a systematic extermination or attempt at exterminating a national, political, racial or cultural group. The Darfur Genocide has violated Article #3, Article #5 and Article #9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Darfur Genocide violates article #3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article #5 has been violated by the Genocide in Darfur. Article #9 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been violated by the Darfur Genocide. Attacks in Darfur are mostly by a group called the Janjaweed which are an Arab based group supported by the Sudanese Government, to carry out attacks on people with different religious, economic and political views. The Darfur Genocide violates the rights of its citizens; steps should be enforced by United Nations and it allies.
"Darfur Genocide | World Without Genocide." Darfur Genocide | World Without Genocide. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2014. .
The purpose of this essay is to adequately depict the current conflict in Darfur and discuss the effects that the Darfur Conflict has had on the neighboring countries, the Horn of Africa region and U.S. interest. In addition, this essay will explore how Darfur Conflict affects global concerns.
Deeb, S. E. (2011). North Sudan faces its likely truncated future. Associate Press , 1.
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the term genocide is considered to be the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial or cultural group (Merriam-Webster). There have been numerous occasions that have claimed the notorious title of genocide, but one of the most controversial can be found in the case of Darfur. The “Darfur Genocide”, as known by many people in the world, denotes the mass raping and killing of the women, men, and even children in the western region of Sudan. This slaughter started in 2003 and continues to play a significant role throughout the world today.
The Sudan genocide, a civil war that was started in the early 1980s when drought, famine and the spread of un-arable land caused traditional African herders and Darfur citizens to argue over land. For the next 22 years relationships worsened between the Arab and non-Arab tribes. The Western region of Sudan: Darfur was thrown into civil war by its own government and two rbel armies in an uprising that should have been seen coming for a long time. This essay will elaberate on the events that occurred in Sudan over the past twenty two years and to what extent the mass killings that occurred can be defined as Genocide. The insurgeny began in Febuary 2003; goning virtually uunnoticed by the international community and shadowed by the ongoing war in Irac. The Sudan governent has been blamed for virtually every event during the past 22 years of civil unrest that has led up to the mass killing of hundreds and thousands of civilians. The many different ethinic groups in Sudan were constantly arguing and fighting over any and all issues and problems that could be brought upon to their attention; this led to growing tension. The mass killings in Sudan could be classified as ethnic cleansing; a term used to describe the killing of an ethnic group of people because their role in that society is unjustified or they are invading on terriotory that they are not welcome on.
This source is the most trustworthy source to find information. This source is great for the project because it gave a great amount of detailed information about the genocide in Darfur. The information was published by World without Genocide (www.worldwithoutgenocide.org) which is an organization to end genocide. Although the website is paid for by an organization, it does not mean it is one hundred percent reliable. Sometimes .org URLS can be biased and can give personal opinions on the topic. The pur...
Straus Scott: Darfur and the Genocide Debate: Foreign Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 2005), pp. 123-133 Published by: Council on Foreign Relations
Straus, Scott. "Darfur And The Genocide Debate." Foreign Affairs 84.1 (2005): 123-133. Business Source Premier. Web. 5 Oct. 2013.
“History repeats itself”, is a commonly used phrase and it is one that can be found to hold true in many situations. Throughout history there have been many incidents in which mass murder has occurred. A modern day example of mass murder in a conflict that is ongoing is the genocides occurring in Darfur, Sudan. The corrupt government in the country supports a group called the Janjaweed, which is the militia group that is mainly responsible for the large number of Darfur residents that have been murdered, raped, or displaced (1). Although the exact number is not known, most sources estimate around 400,000 people have died and another 2,500,000 have been displaced (1). The conflict started in 2003 and although it is not as severe as it has been in past years the issue still exists and the people of Darfur are still experiencing murder and suffering. The conflict in Darfur has been a topic of discussion for many nations, including the United States. The issue arises of whether or not larger nations, who have more power, should aid in the effort to stop the Darfur genocide. Some believe very strongly that the United States has an obligation to step up and help this country control a largely unethical situation. Others take the opposite argument and have reasons to believe the interests of the United States would be best served elsewhere. The situation is more complex than it initially seems and many factors must be analyzed when considering if the United States is obligated to intervene. At the same time, a conflict of this severity and size cannot be easily contained by a small and struggling nation and sometimes a bigger nation is needed to help with a conflict of this magnitude. Being a world power, the United States has the resour...
Although there are some similarities between the holocaust and the genocide in Darfur, both mass executions were unneeded and unwanted. The toil millions of individuals have had to endure is mind boggling. The present and future generations must keep the memory of these tragic events as evidence for anyone who denies history, the more people we keep educated the less likely similar events will take place. At least that's the
Throughout Northern and Central Africa ethnic fighting and mass genocide has run rampant. Clashes between, diverse ethnic and cultural people has caused instability, these mass humanitarian disasters that can no longer be ignored. With the help of other nations South Sudan can go from another mass genocide waiting to happen, to a region supplier of much needed resources, with the help of other nations. In the 1990’s Rwanda genocide was basically ignored by the United States government and because of this hundreds of thousands were either killed or injured in the area. In the early 2000’s the war in Darfur, created a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Darfur's non-Arabs. Again thousands of Africans were killed and the United States government and the American people ignored genocide.
Natsios, A. S. (2012). Sudan, South Sudan, and Darfur: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford:
Another genocide that still happens today is the Darfur Genocide, beginning in 2003, and happening today. Darfur, a region located in Western Sudan is subject to a two-fold problem: one being after the civil war between North and South Sudan, Darfur was obliterated, leaving the nomadic people of Darfur resourceless and searching for help. The second problem Darfur has is there is a lot of oil in Darfur, making the region very appealing to the Sudanese government. Once the war between the North and the South culminated, the government neglected to assist Darfur in their losses as a result of the destruction. This made the Darfur people very irate, and feeling the need to do something about it. Beginning in 2003, two rebellious groups “the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) and the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA)”