The Higher Education Opportunity Act: Teachers Improving Their Education

715 Words2 Pages

To improve education in the United States, the core objectives in federal education legislation address the improvement of teacher education and quality, for example, Higher Education Opportunity Act (Cohen-vogel, 2005). Teacher preparation program is one of the policy instruments to deliver the goals. Unlike traditional preparation program and alternative teacher preparation programs, Urban Teacher Residency (UTR) is an innovative preparation program improving teacher quality in which a mentor will be assigned to work with the novice teacher for a year. UTRs are distinctive than other programs mainly in three aspects as follows: recruitment, preparation, and ongoing induction. First established in 2002, UTRs have gained its popularity and grown to 13 network programs by 2013 with $143 million federal fund support (Boston Teacher Residency Project Narrative, 2010).
While there is growing attention to UTRs, very few evaluation of this program that can provide substantial evidence to see whether UTRs can improve student achievement has been conducted. The article, “Does an urban Teacher Residency Increase Student Achievement? Early Evidence From Boston”, provides the first independent evaluation to assess the impact of one of UTRs programs on student academic performance. Policymakers and practitioners can evaluate possible policy options for the financing of the program and guide their decision-making process based on these evaluation results. To ensure the findings accurately reflect the real program impact, it is also essential to review the validity and credibility of the evaluation results. In this paper, I will present a review of an impact evaluation for Boston Teacher Residency (BTR), one of the longest-running UTRs programs...

... middle of paper ...

...tification and a master’s degree as what teachers in traditional preparation programs do. Furthermore, BTR offers the new teacher ongoing coach and network seminars to assist them with finding a teaching position after candidates graduate (Papay, West, Fullerton, & Kane, 2012).
In sum, the distinctive aspects and structures of BTR program contribute to possible program effect factors. Therefore, the relevant outcomes for BTR program include recruiting more teachers in hard-to-staff subjects, better teaching preparation and training, higher retention rate. From stakeholder perspectives, these three expected effects of the program perfectly reflect the key components of the mission of BTR program: “recruit, prepare, and sustain excellent teachers” (Solomon, 2009). The expected program effects can be also illustrated using Program Impact Theories as shown in Chart 1.

More about The Higher Education Opportunity Act: Teachers Improving Their Education

Open Document