The Gun Control Debate Continues

1774 Words4 Pages

In today’s society it’s easy to find something in a newspaper, magazine, or on television that portrays the scrutiny of guns in the home. While reading or viewing such opinions it can possibly influence one to see issues in a particular way. It is not my goal to persuade you to lean in a specific direction but to see the issue from different angles. When viewing both arguments you are faced with reflecting on your own opinion and possibly agreeing more firmly with your own choice or changing your outlook and coming across the subject in a new way.

According the Cato Institute the Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. This amendment has different views and one is being able to support the national defense. Another opinion can be read as being able to defend and keep individual’s rights to carry a gun if they decide to do so. In either case the result of this amendment allows the right to defend one's self as a basic human right, and banning guns would deprive law-abiding citizens of the ability to defend themselves. According to the constitution gun ownership is protected and justified just like freedom of speech and religion has been in the Bill of Right’s.

Harry Henderson stated that in February 28, 1994, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Law (the Brady Act) required a five-day waiting period for all handgun purchases from dealers. Whenever there is the sale of a handgun, shotgun, or long rifle to a prospective buyer, a background check must be performed on that person to decide whether that person is forbidden from owning a firearm due to past criminal actions. According to...

... middle of paper ...

...rican Journal of Epidemiology. (2004). Print

Fuentes, Annette. “Guns Don’t Make Homes Safer.” The Progressive Magazine. July . 2008. Print.

“Gun Control: Awesome Library. Web. 01 Apr 2010. .

“Gun Control.” Just Facts.com. Web. 01 Apr 2010. .

“Guns in the Home.” Interview by Maria Rodriguez. 10 Mar. 2010. Print.

Haerens, Margaret. Gun Violence Opposing Viewpoints. Farmington Hills: . Thomson Corporation, 2006 Thomson Corp. Print.

Henderson, Harry. Gun Control. New York: Facts on File Inc, 2000. Print.

Kellerman, Arthur. “Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor for Homicide in the Home.” . New England Journal of Medicine 329.15 (1993) 1084-091. Print

Levy, Robert A. Pistol Whipped: Baseless Lawsuits, Foolish Laws. Washington: Cato ………Institute, 2001. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Gun Debate: Where Is The Middle Ground?

    104 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Mallory Simon article "Gun Debate: Where is the Middle Ground?" Amardeep Kaleka made a vow: He would do whatever he could to ensure nobody ever went through what his family had. When his father was one of the victims of the Sikh shooting. Kaleka asked a panel of polar opposite views if there was a middle ground. Though they had opposite views the panel was able to come to an agreement that enforcing background checks is the middle ground. It will take a lot of money and resources but they feel it is the best option/first step to improving gun control in America.

    Read More

  • POS 2041 Final

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The Controversy of Gun Control." Open Discussion about Various Controversies. N.p.. Web. 3 Dec 2013. .

    Read More

  • Summary Of Mark O 'Mara's' Gun Abate? What Gun Debate

    1114 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his article “Gun debate? What gun debate?” Mark O 'Mara discuses the controversial issue of gun control. O’Mara takes the tragic school shooting in Oregon as an opportunity to voice his opinion on the debate of guns. He clearly states his position and explains that gun violence has increased enormously because of the lack of command by the government and support from the public to speak out against it. O’Mara claims the issue is no longer a debate because it is so evident that guns have become a significant problem in this country and therefore actions must be taken to control and govern gun laws. In his article he attempts to raise awareness to the severity of the issue and tries to persuade his readers to take a stance against gun violence

    Read More

  • Gun Control versus Gun Rights

    1430 Words  | 3 Pages

    In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: America Needs a Uniform National Gun Policy

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    A.     According to the Brady Foundation, one of the leading campaigns to end gun violence. 36% of the nation, 18 of 50 states, impose a waiting period.. (prevent crimes of passion, no background check, not able to check if buyer is prohibited or not to purchase.)

    Read More

  • Why Is The Second Amendment Important

    778 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This statement basically means that people should be able to own guns for their own security and that right should not be taken away. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution because the creators of the Constitution wanted to make sure that it protected basic rights, including the right to bear arms. It was also added to the Constitution because shortly after it was ratified, James Madison wanted to give more power to the state militia and to give more power to the people to give them the ability to fight back against the Federalists and the tyrannical government they were creating. After fighting off the British, the Second Amendment was created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against controlling government and protect themselves with their own weapons.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Is Unconstitutional

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are entitled to the right to bear arms and taking that right away would be unconstitutional. Guns are not the cause for all the violence and crimes that have happened over the years. They do not increase the death rates. Children are more likely to die in a car or swimming pool accident then gun related deaths (VerBruggen). The weapons are needed for protection and hunting, owning a gun is not unconstitutional Taking the Second Amendment away or changing it would be unconstitutional and Un American, It is like any other right. This right is one of the reasons why we are the land of the free and home of the brave. “Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both” - Benjamin Franklin

    Read More

  • United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the biggest reasons that handguns should not be banned is because of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” People who argue that guns should be banned state the Second Amendment was not intended for the regular civilian, but rather the militia. This is where they are wrong. The Supreme court has taken a case like this in Heller vs District of Columbia. Heller had been caught using a handgun and sued the U.S. on the right for civilians to bear arms. The Court decided and interpreted the Second Amendment as the right for all the civilians to bear arms and not just the militia. Also along with amendments and acts, there are two different acts that put restrictions on who can and cannot buy guns. The Gun Act of 1968 and the Brady Act both put different restrictions on who can buy guns. The Gun Act of 1968 has te...

    Read More

  • The Battle Between Gun Control and Gun Rights

    1116 Words  | 3 Pages

    An estimated 30,000 people are killed each year by guns in the United States alone according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Gun Control, Funk & Wagnall’s). Though there have been some restrictions and laws placed, both the conservative and liberal sides are not pleased with either the lack of action or the fact that there has been too much action that has taken place. “About 38% of U.S. households and 26% of individuals owned at least one gun, with about half of the individuals having 4 or more guns, according to a 2004 survey by the Harvard School of Public Health (Gun Control, Funk & Wagnall’s).” Both sides turn to the one document centered on the argument for evidence to support their side: the Second Amendment.

    Read More

  • Gun Control : A Middle Ground

    660 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second amendment to the US Constitution shows that it is unconstitutional to have complete and total gun control. The second amendment states that “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that it is the right of an American citizen, abiding by the constitution, has the right to bear arms. Currently, there are over three hundred and seven billion people residing as American citizens. Within the homes of these Americans, forty five percent have a registered gun in their household. As a diverse nation, there are many reasons why there are guns located within a household. Sixty percent stated the gun is used for protection against int...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Handgun Ownership Be Banned

    358 Words  | 1 Pages

    The second amendment says, "A well regulated militia being necessary to security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The second amendment was made for two things. It is there for first, to guarantee the individuals right to have arms for self-defense and self-preservation. The second reason is related to the militia. The right to carry a handgun for self-protection is a privilege of citizenship. The confusion is the right of the state or the individual. The regulation of handguns could be looked at as unconstitutional. The amendment is for the people and not the state.

    Read More

  • The Debate Concerning Gun Control

    824 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over the past few decades gun control has come to the fore front of debate in politics and the mass media. It's no wonder that in the wake of the recent school shootings and attacks on churches that people are beginning to fear guns. People are beginning to see guns as an object of death and destruction and not as what they are meant to be. While guns are used in war they are not intended to kill innocent people, guns are intended to be used by experienced gun handlers for protection and hunting. When used properly a gun is no more dangerous than a car or a knife, all of these can be used in crime but none of them are intended to be.

    Read More

  • Gun Control And The Second Amendment Essay

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    This also states that gun violence would be reduced and restrictions have already existed. It also states that the majority of Americans, including gun owners, support new gun restrictions. However, some people affirm that the Second Amendment protects the individual(s) right to own a gun. They state guns are needed for self-defense from the threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders (gun-control.procon.org, 2016). Gun ownership deters crime rather than cause more crime.

    Read More

  • Second Amendment: Right to Self-Protection

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    There have been numerous debates inspired by the topic of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is a civil right which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Based on this right all citizens should have the right to protect themselves and their families. I support the Second Amendment if the people who have obtained a weapon or who are trying to obtain one have been properly trained, are in the right state of mind, and have no criminal background. If a person owns a gun, does not mean they will act violently with it. There are many other weapons that could be used to do the same job. Guns don’t kill people, it’s the people that use them that are the killers. The Second Amendment should be supported by all citizens who want to protect themselves, their families and friends.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate.

    Read More

More about The Gun Control Debate Continues

Open Document