Every day people are learning new things about the internet. The internet keeps you updated every second something is uploaded or information that is put on for the whole world to see. With the internet evolving from what it used to be, more and more important information Is being put out to teach others. The internet Is used around the world in countries that don’t get the chance of freedom like other countries get. Kevin Clarke writes an essay Tweet Like an Egyptian stating how technology has changed the world at a fast rate. Many countries that don’t have the freedom as we do, have seen what we are capable of and have protested for the same justice. Clarke states “The Young people who took to the streets in Egypt and Tunisia were not demanding the freedom they could only imagine, they were demanding the freedom they had already experienced in their virtual lives, a freedom they wanted to translate into the actual daily lives” (Clarke pg. 167). What he means by this is that people have seen the freedom that they could have and are fighting to get the freedom others do have. The internet is seen as a power of knowledge. More and more people are now realizing what they can do with the internet are using it for information they could use to challenge authority, using fact to get what they
My experience online has included years of habituating virtual communities patterned on the electronic frontier motif as defined by Rheingold in the subtitle to his book, The Virtual Community. He offers this definition of the subject:
Communities are all about groups of individuals who share something in common. This makes going on the internet seem like an odd way to find more communities, form new ones, or strengthen pre-existing ones. The internet however is full of communities. Communities can be based upon religion, location, ethnicity, an interest, or a personal matter. The internet itself is “a global distributed data communications network” (Kirmayer, Raikhel, & Rahimi, 2013, p. 166). This is what makes the internet so full of communities because communication is the key to putting multiple individuals with commonalities into communication, which is the basis of any community. Online communities differ from communities that exists off the web in a couple of big ways such as authority figures, anonymity, and lack of hierarchy within communities. These online communities have a lack of privacy and have the ability to hold onto information for long periods of time. Individuals lives are also impacted by these online communities in various methods such as cyber bullying.
...ocial media has altered the competition. The era of social media has not merely altered how business is completed; it has altered the distinctiveness of its users. As individual uniqueness changes, what it means tot be a civilian changes as well. Loyalties may not be easy for nationwide governments any longer. An older system of looking at the trouble is just to provide it additional government concentration, but the character of this intricate setback ought to amend the its international extent, the uniqueness of the flaws necessitate a further complicated approach than plain government rule. The association of individuals in the midst of governments, with more and more influential business interests, ought to assist in defending citizens from cyber attacks. It is not one side or the other; it is both sides operating jointly in the direction of a general resolution.
Current advancements in technology have brought about innovations that have made communication with people oversees to be just by a click of a button. This is done through various social media such as Facebook, MySpace, Instagram, Twitter, Yahoo and Google+ that allow interaction. People can take photos and videos of their day to day life experiences and share them with the rest of the world by uploading them onto these social websites. As such, the world has been converted into a global village where most information is just a click of a button away (Sturm, 2012).
The social and political ramifications of electronic networking has become a favorite topic of speculation in recent years. Cover stories, conferences, books, Web sites, and radio and television programs devoted to the subject have grown exponentially. In looking over the burgeoning literature on the political uses of the Net, I find that most of it falls into three general categories: 1) questions of democratic culture and practice, such as the pros and cons of direct democracy, issues of privacy and social control, and the changing nature of public opinion; 2) how on-line petitioning, electronic voting, information campaigning and other forms of "netactivism" can promote politics more narrowly defined; and 3) the implications of networking technologies for communities. This paper leaves aside the first two categories and focuses specifically on the third: whether computer networks can be used to strengthen and enhance the bonds of community.
With comparatively new innovations like the internet, global news, and social media, the world in the over the past few decades is larger and more connected than it had ever been before. Humans have access to other cultures and cultural practices in a way that was almost unimaginable to civilizations of the past. Cultures have a chance to commingle and influence each other; economies in an increasingly global market become interdependent on stock and international trade with each other. Countries recently escaping the banner of colonialism both begin to assert their independence and yet still remain forever altered by the culture that was once occupier. The internet and popular culture emerge. Not only do the media have access to different
...ce interactions are intrinsically tied at the local and global scales. As workspaces become less tangible, and as social circles are no longer constrained by geographical boundaries, the content of our daily interactions grows to include people and businesses from all over the globe. As a consequence cyberspace is an active factor in the reshaping of our world that is growing in complexity as it accommodates virtual networks.
No matter how far or near of anything happen around the globe, people can see and hear of what have been occurred immediately, with just matter of seconds. Electronic media, Mcluhan said, made people aware of and respond to issues happened around the globe as if it happen in the same village people are living in. “Today, after more than a century of electric technology, we have extended our central nervous system in a global embrace, abolishing both space and time as far as our planet is concerned” (Mcluhan, 1964, p.3).
People are greatly influenced by what others say and do (Cohn, 2012). People communicate online and join in on a social network of nongovernmental organizations, religious and humanitarian groups, human rights associations, consumer protection advocated, environmental activists, and others. People are more informed about these different groups because of the easy access to information. The electronic networks can comment their ideas on events and pressure corporations, and governments. The Internet allows people all over the world to campaign for their cause (Ch. 13).