The Government Must NOT Censor Pornography

Pornography is an issue that has and will continue to cause much debate. While there are many people who see pornography as degrading, sinful, and disgusting, there is also a large number of people who see it as a turn on, a form of sexual expression, and entertainment. Webster’s Dictionary defined pornography as merely “the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement.” Yet there is still the everlasting question which is “does pornography serve a real purpose, and if so what purpose it that?” continues. I happen to acknowledge pornography with only a few minor glitches. I don’t believe in censoring pornography, yet analyzing pornography that is already censored.

Fortunately, women, along with men, can independently choose a job of their likings. Aside from this, individuals may argue that porn causes people to commit sexual violence; however, this would fall under common practice of misinterpreting data. Essentially, here is insufficient evidence to showcase that erotic pornography causes sexual violence; however, it does show a positive correlation, similar to how being malnurtured can enhance the chances of committing an act of sexual violence. Erotic porn is indeed a controversial topic, which explains the difficulties of restricting

Is The Use of Sexual Imagery in Ad Campaigns Unethical? People will soon realize that they're being manipulated by advertising companies due to sexual imagery. Even though a person may buy a product due to sexual imagery, it defeats the purpose of selling the product if the product is not any good. Also, companies will only gain temporary customers if sex is their only strategy for advertising Not only will the consumers feel cheated and utilized, it will take a much greater attempt on the part of the advertisers to regain the customer’s trust. Therefore, using sexual imagery in advertising is unethical because it distracts the consumer from the original issue in which it is for them to buy something.

(Davis, p. x... ... middle of paper ... ... to the search. For example, love plays a role in our sexuality. If someone did not know this they would enter “human sexuality” into the search engine and again may be distracted by flashy, hard-core, sex-sites and may not find anything on love. The over-all understanding of human sexuality would be limited according to which sites were looked at. Although I agree somewhat with Advisee's claim that soft-core , rather than hard-core pornography, may be a better resource for studying human sexuality.

While this is sometimes done by using sexual appeal as an attention grabber, sex can be portrayed in commercials as a gender stereotype or in a desirable way. Unfortunately, when sex appeal is portrayed in an unrealistic, impractical way, this has allowed the general population to compare themselves to models that may not even exist.

I believe that people who search out porn that has violence in it have been abused themselves. Should an experiment be conducted on regular people with no history of violence, they would either not be turned on by pornography that consists of violence or rape. It is likely that some people, including some of the men in the experiments, were turned on due to the act of sex more than the act of women being abused sexually. Works Cited Russell, Diana E. Dangerous Relationships: Pornography, Misogyny, and Rape. (Sage Publications, 1998.)

If you could always do what you've always wanted the thought of not being able to do something would be so foreign to you that you would not understand what it was to not have freedom, for that matter you would not understand what having freedom was either. That is why it is impossible to have one-hundred percent freedom, because if we ever reached one-hundred percent freedom you would be treading on other peoples freedoms because not everyone wants the same thing. That is what I believe Hegel is trying to say is that freedom is simply the process of freedoms progress, not a tangible goal because as free as you might think you are you still have laws and limitations and thats OK it should be looked at as a reminder of what freedom we do have. Hegel says that the nature of spirit's direct opposite is matter. And the essence of matter is gravity and the essence of spirit is freedom.

IF viewed by a sexually immature adolescent, it can be harmful as it displays unrealistic standards for sex, improper to no contraception use and displays a relaxed attitude of casual sex and sex for pleasure. If pornography is the only sexual education a young person is receiving, it can be said that the young person is in trouble in terms of their sexual health. This, however, is not the fault of pornography itself. Pornography is a stimulating and arousing activity meant for sexual release. A child who views pornography is not interpreting it the same way an adult is and may perceive it as real where an adult would not.

Or maybe their not and that’s why some people turn to pornography. Some partners might even see this as cheating. But why do some people see this as cheating? Some suggestions are by DR. Phil “Consider how it makes your partner feel. It makes your partner feel ugly, hurt, deceived, lied to or inadequate.

Lastly, the concerns surrounding pornography and sexual objectification are exploited through Soble’s view, illustrating that when sexual objectification is put into context with pornography, it is morally wrong as it defeats the purpose of humanity by treating one solely as a sex object. All philosophical views provided have been disputed and or question, though through the opinions of these Philosophers we are provided with few circumstances where sexual objectification is morally permissible, and not.