Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
an argumentative essay on the gold standard
an argumentative essay on the gold standard
gold standard pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: an argumentative essay on the gold standard
THE GOLD STANDARD IN THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM
During the late nineteenth century, the global economy was characterized by use of a gold standard. The gold standard helped to unite the economies of the world’s nations, thereby leading to increased prosperity and stability. The success of the gold standard was related to the particular circumstances of the time. As conditions changed, the gold standard became less viable and was eventually dropped. This paper will describe the pros and cons of the gold standard as it existed in the nineteenth century. In this way, an explanation will be provided for why the gold standard rose to prominence and then declined.
The gold standard is a monetary system in which the value of a nation’s currency is attached to the value of gold. In this system, gold can be exchanged for currency and currency can be exchanged for gold. During the nineteenth century, the major nations of the world switched to the gold standard, thereby replacing the previous system of bimetallism (a standard based on the values of both gold and silver). In 1821, Britain was the first nation to adopt the gold standard. At the time, Britain was the wealthiest and most powerful nation in the world. In order to facilitate international trade, other nations began following Britain’s example (Eichengreen 7). The change did not occur smoothly in every country. For example, after the United States adopted the gold standard in 1873, a politician named William Jennings Bryan led a movement to switch to a silver standard instead. At that time, silver was relatively cheap because an abundance of it had been discovered in the mines of the Western U.S. Bryan, an advocate for the rights of farmers and other laborers...
... middle of paper ...
...ple, monetary authorities were more concerned with convertibility and national interests than they were with economic issues on the domestic level. The gold standard also declined because of the problem of governments needing reserves in order to back up their currencies. Governments were not always able to meet this demand, especially as the world’s supply of gold dwindled over time.
Works Cited
Balachandran, G. “Power and Markets in Global Finance: The Gold Standard, 1890-1926.” Journal of Global History 3 (2008), 313-335.
Eichengreen, Barry. Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Galbraith, John Kenneth. Economics in Perspective: A Critical History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1987.
Weatherford, Jack. The History of Money. New York: Three Rivers Press, 1997.
After moving to Chicago, Harvey established a printing press and published a weekly magazine called “Coin”. Although his printing company was unsuccessful, he wrote and published a series of inexpensive books called “Coin’s Financial School,” dedicated to the idea of replacing gold with silver as the monetary system. These books not only gave Harvey the nickname he would be known as for the rest of his life, b...
The July 1944 United Nations Financial and Monetary Conference, known as the Bretton Woods Conference, who created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the forerunner of the World Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). The “Bretton Woods system” was bolstered in 1947 with the addition of the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), forerunner of the World Trade
There is perhaps no other political issue in our contemporary society that is more pertinent, pervasive, and encompassing than a nation’s economy. From the first coins used in Greece and the Asia Minor in the 7th century BCE, to the earliest uses of paper money, history has proven time and time again that the control of a region’s economy is absolutely crucial to maintaining social stability and prosperity. Yet, for over a century scholars have continued to speculate why the United States, one of the world’s strongest and most influential countries, has one of the most unstable economies. Although the causes of this economic instability can be attributed to multiple factors, nearly all economists agree that they have a common ancestor: the Federal Reserve Bank – the official central bank of the United States. Throughout the course of this paper, I will attempt to determine whether or not there is a causal relationship between the Federal Reserve Bank’s monetary policies and the decline of the U.S. economy. I will do this through a brief analysis of the history and role of this institution, in addition to the central banking system in general. In turn, I will argue that the reckless and intentional manipulation of the economy by the Federal Reserve Bank, through inflation and the abolishment of the gold standard, has led to the current economic crisis in the United States.
This article is about the circumstances that led to the collapse of the economy in 1929. It relates to my research proposal because I am evaluating historic events that led to the financial crisis of 1929. The article discusses how deflation played an important role in expanding the depression, and how the Gold Standard, a monetary system in which a country’s government allows its currency unit to be freely converted into fixed amounts of gold and vice versa, was an extremely bad decision because it caused the dollar to lose its value. This source was informal because it discusses prehistoric events that led to the crash of and I love how the article discusses that the Federal Reserve played a key role in the failure of the stock market. The Federal Reserve supports any war the United States is involved.
Gold has been valued in our cultural history for as long as societies have been able to adopt this valuable metal’s unique properties. Gold is unique in its inherent marvellous glossy shine. Gold is particularly malleable, conducts electricity, doesn’t blemish and blends well with other metals. Because of these exclusive properties, gold creates its ways in our everyday life in many ways or form. Gold has always had remarkable significance, shown by most civilizations as a symbol of wealth and power. Gold has captivated most of cultures around the world and the passion for it brings to the extermination of some cultures and the growth in condition of others. This essay explores the use of gold over time and perception of the cultures that surround by gold.
Conversion to modern worth: Lawrence H. Officer and Samuel H. Williamson. « Purchasing Power of Money in the United States from 1774 to 2010 » MeasuringWorth. 2011.
Workers grew concerned about their situation as the century progressed, after the Silver Crash of 1893. The Sherman Act of 1890 (SHRM, 2014) obliged the Treasury to buy silver every month at market value. The government had bought almost all the silver from the mines. This also caused the depletion of gold. People presented their issued notes to the government and received gold instead of silver. Workers organized and tried to improve their lot in life. Management and government opposed their efforts. J.P. Morgan had an upper hand here. Morgan purchased the debt of the Treasury for 3.5 million ounces of gold in exchange for $65 million worth of 30-year gold bonds. During this time of panic, J.P. Morgan acted as the Nation’s bank.
Gaynor Ellis, Elisabeth, and Anthony Esler. ""New Economic Thinking"" World History: The Modern Era. Prentice Hall. 186. Print.
Hepburn, A. Barton. A History of Currency in the United States. New York: August M. Kelley Publishers, 1915.
In the time between the Civil War and World War I, there was a great economic instability. Men wanted their money to be backed by precious metals, although, they were not in agreement on what precious metal that would be. For the most part, men of high status, who owned large companies, desired their dollar to be insured with gold and only gold. Men of humble institutions, factory workers, and laborers from small farms wanted their dollar to be backed by silver and gold. Both sides have sufficient reasons for their desire of silver, gold, or both to back their money.
“In the years which followed the gold discoveries, society was not stratified. Moral and religious principles were often disregarded, and all kinds of irregular situations could be found.”3
The Gilded Age is a period of volatile development in American trade and cultivation. Gilded Age government were conquered by fraud, as representatives took inducements and content their groups with posh management jobs. The three major problem happened in during Glided age was Currency Reform, Social Darwinism and political corruption. The Currency Reform is one of the most significant problem commerce with finances was that of Currency Reform. However the corruption was so common during glided age. However because of that City government administrated by dishonest machines like” New York's Tammany Hall”. The simple problem reposes about the idea that the quantity of money in flow controls its worth. However, it shared by that knowledge about l that money that was not supported by solid funds.
In this essay, we initially examine what led to the end of the Bretton Woods System. Although several factors have been identified, the ones highlighted in the essay look at the ‘Growth in capital mobility’ during that period and the ‘Role of the United States’, which is further elaborated in Section I of the essay. Under Section II, the essay aims at analysing the performance of the Bretton Woods System. The analysis is done on the basis of looking at the ‘Role in the transition of economies post World War II ‘ and ‘Growth of trade’ during that period. Factors that led to...
The theme of this essay outlines two things. One, the key elements of Bretton woods system and second, the characterisation of Bretton woods system by Ruggie as ‘embedded liberalism’, and how far he succeeds in it. The Bretton woods system is widely referred to the international monetary regime, which prevailed from the end of the World War 2 until the early 1970s. After the end of the World War 2, the need of international monetary framework to boost trade and economic; growth and stability, was important. Taking its name from the site of the 1944 conference, attended by all forty-four allied nations; the Bretton Woods system consisted of four key elements. First, to make a system in which each member nation has to fix or peg his currency exchange rate against the gold or U.S. dollar, as the key currency. Secondly, the free exchange of currencies between countries at the established and fixed exchange rate; plus or minus a one-percent margin. Thirdly, to create an institutional forum, so-called International Monetary Fund (IMF), for the international co-operation on money matters: to set up, stabilize, and watch over exchange rates. Fourth, to remove all the existing exchange controls limiting (protectionism) policies by the members, on the use of its currency for international trade. In practice the first scheme, as well as its later development and final demise, were directly dependent on the preferences and policies of its most powerful member, the United States. According to John Gerard Ruggie, 1982, this Bretton woods system of monetary co-operation represented the type of liberalism which characterise “domestic social economic stability along with a liberal trading order.” He referred this system as ‘embed...
Brian Domitrovic, PhD, Chairman of the Department of History at Sam Houston State University, stated in his article The Gold Standard: The Foundation of Our Economy’s Greatness that, “From the first full year that the constitution’s outline of the gold standard took effect, 1790, until 1913, the year the Federal Reserve came into existence and the serial dismantling of the gold standard began, the United States economy increased in size, in real terms, by just about 150-fold” (Should The United States Return To The Gold Standard?, 2013). This record of growth was so large that the United States’ economy was over twice as large as Germany’s, our closest rival. Domitrovic also appreciated the stability the gold standard provided if managed correctly, because it limited inflation and slowed rises in consumer prices. In addition, it limited the government’s ability to create money as the government could only print money if there was enough gold to back