1. Aspects of the Totalitarian Systems in the Novels The following section wil analyse how the totalitarian systems in the novels are constructed and list the important aspects they consist of. Due to word-limitations the concentration is put only on the main aspects: The head of the system, laws and punishments and the concept that the systems are constructed up on. 2.1 Who is Head of the System The head of Panem is Coriolanus Snow. He calles himself President Snow, even though he is an absolute ruler and there are no votes. He is portrayed as very strict and scrupulous. His resident is in the Capitol, the capital of Panem. The Capitol has all the wealth of Panem and is the host of the ‘Games’. In contrast we have the ‘Committee of Elders’ in The Giver, with the ‘Chief Elder’ at their top. They are a group of elderly people, which lead the Community: they make all the decisions , choose the Assignment for the people and can change rules . Another part of the leadership in The Giver in the ‘Receiver’. He is part of the Committee of Elders, however he is isolated from them because he bears the memories ot the Community. These should give him wisdom so that he can be questioned by the committee when new and difficult problems occur. A parallel between both novels is the close supervision the leaders have on their citizens. In The Giver we can see that they are monitored via speakers and that “[a]ll private ceremonies are recorded” . In The Hunger Games we learn about the supervision in the secound book, Catching Fire, when Snow pressures and thretens Katniss by knowing everything about her life, also about the kiss with Gale . 2.2 Laws and Punishment Right from the beginning it is obvious that in the community in The Giver the... ... middle of paper ... ...n impossible as there is no real differntiation between male and feemale and as there are no religions. Another foundation of the community is the lack of choises for the citizens. All choises have either been settled in the past or are adopted by the Committee of Elders. The only real choice that the citizens have over their live is weather to have an familiy unit and, for the students, where to spend their volunteer hours . This was a needed action for the community to prevent the citizens of making wrong decisions. As the Giver said, every member of the community lives a life that was created for him or her . An additional quality of the community is that it is very constant. There is rarely any change and if, then very slow and little. The Committee of Elders do not exept anything new or foreign, as they have no memories and only have knowledge of the momentary.
A community is comprised of a group of goal oriented individuals with similar beliefs and expectations. Currently the term is used interchangeably with society, the town one lives in and even religion. A less shallow interpretation suggests that community embodies a lifestyle unique to its members. Similarities within the group establish bonds along with ideals, values, and strength in numbers unknown to an individual. Ideals and values ultimately impose the culture that the constituents abide by. By becoming part of a community, socialization...
In the book Seedfolks by Paul Fleischman there are many different characters, and even some of them cross paths. A community garden was started just by one person therefore everyone follows. They all learn how to get along with other people, how to not stereotype so much, and how to depend on each other in their community. All of them struggle with something, whether it's with family, friends, or feeling stereotyped. They learn the importance of a community, and realize how much they really depend on each other. Having a community is important for all people to incorporate diversity, culture,and unique stories into their lives. You don't realize how much people depend on their community until its gone. The importance
1. In her book “Total Domination”, Hannah Arendt strongly believed that Totalitarianism is trying to achieve the idea of Total domination. She studied and analyzed how totalitarianism had always falls into the idea of total domination in which she explained how total domination works in her point of view and her own description of Totalitarian. Her purpose is to show how the leaders treated humans lesser than animals in a way of how they torture people with their cruelty. She seems to have a great ideas of her comparison that gives justice to really make me believe that totalitarian has the same idea of total dominion.
Beneath the surface of orderliness and sameness in both communities lies an extensive network of social discipline. In The Giver, citizens are distributed spatially according to their stage of life. For example, the newborn children live together at the Nurturing Center, children and adults live together in families, and the oldest adults live together in the House of the Old. Also, the power structures control activities for a purpose to encourage those that are useful towards the society and those that are considered counterproductive. Therefore, children’s lives are tightly regulated by their defined jobs and participation in the...
"Our whole social system is based upon Regularity, or Equality” (Abbott 23). Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions by Edwin A. Abbott and The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins are both books that were later turned into movies. Flatland involves an upper class square, A. Square, and his adventure through different dimensions set in a representational society of nineteenth century England. Meanwhile, The Hunger Games contains the journey a poor girl from District 12 named Katniss Everdeen, who is left to the mercy of the Capital. Although both Flatland and The Hunger Games are two completely different books, they both share similar hierarchical aspects.
Totalitarian rulers often control the thoughts and beliefs of people as well. The citizens of the community are forbidden to question or explore things that are unknown to other citizens. By doing this, the government emphasizes that they know everything and have ...
In these two societies, they both are similar by having a strict government that does not let anyone leave the community but however, in The Giver no body...
This book was written in the 1940’s as a warning to society against the danger of allowing a totalitarianism society and even though it is fictional in nature, many of the dangers warned against are still real today. Throughout the world, many live with extreme governmental interference in their daily lives, unable to freely speak their mind without fear of reprisal. Governments use modern technology to invade the privacy of their citizens. There were many aspects to the book that left this reader feeling just a little bit uneasy.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
Complete governmental control develops as an apparent theme of both 1984 and The Hunger Games. 1984 uses the concept of big brother for the sole purpose of instilling a dependence on the government for every aspect in the citizens’ lives. Similarly, the capitol of Panem in The Hunger Games censors information from the people so that any idea of revolution will be instantaneously
Community is like a Venn diagram. It is all about relations between a finite group of people or things. People have their own circles and, sometimes, these circles overlap one another. These interceptions are interests, common attitudes and goals that we share together. These interceptions bond us together as a community, as a Venn diagram. A good community needs good communication where people speak and listen to each other openly and honestly. It needs ti...
For a historian, the 20th century and all the historic events that it encompasses represents a utopia with endless sources of inspiration for the analysis of political figures, events and their consequences. Political figures such as Benito Mussolini of Italy, Adolf Hitler of Germany, Mao Zedong of China and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are all names we are familiar with due to the time period that they influenced; this time period after the trauma and atrocities of World War I and the Great Depression led to completely new forms of government in Europe and beyond. These “manifestations of political evil”, commonly known as totalitarian states, should not be considered as mere extensions of already existing political systems, but rather as completely new forms of government built upon terror and ideological fiction. Therefore, this was also a time in which political philosophers such as Hannah Arendt, the author of the standard work on totalitarianism, “Origins of Totalitarianism”, could thrive. When looking at totalitarianism as a political philosophy, two initial questions have to be dealt with: what is totalitarianism and what kind of effect it had on countries ruled by totalitarian regimes. The reasons for its occurrence have briefly been mentioned above, although there are much deeper ideological, social and economic reasons including imperialism and anti-Semitism. In order to fully understand it, we must also contrast it to other political systems like authoritarianism and dictatorship, which are similar to a certain extent, but lack crucial elements that are in the core of totalitarian ideology. Out of the many examples of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century, Nazi Germany, Communist China and the Soviet Union stan...
... and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. “Totalitarianism is a Unique Type of Society.” In Mason, Paul T., ed. Totalitarianism: Temporary Madness or Permanent Danger? Problems in European Civilization. Boston: D.C. Heath, 1967.
The movie The Hunger Games (based on the novel by Suzanne Collins) and The Giver, a novel by Lois Lowry, both display governments that enforce strict rules in order to limit the freedom of their citizens. Both of these novels are centered on dystopian societies in which the government removes the freedom of choice and individuality in order to establish oppressive control over its citizens. Katniss and Jonas are the exception when it comes to the citizens of both “communities” and how they are overly controlled while being unaware of their loss of freedom. Both characters selflessly put themselves in danger in order to save their younger siblings, or adopted sibling in Jonas’s case, from the oppressive government. Katniss takes the place of her younger sister in the fight to the death, while Jonas takes responsibility of a young child by removing him from the corrupt and enclosed community in which they live. Both Katniss and Jonas challenge the oppressive rules in their communities by being brave and selfless.
In a not-too-distant, some 74 years, into the future the United States of America has collapsed, weakened by drought, fire, famine, and war, to be replaced by Panem, a country divided into the Capitol and 13 districts. Each year, two young representatives from each district are selected by lottery to participate in The Hunger Games; these children are referred to as tributes (Collins, 2008). The Games are meant to be viewed as entertainment, but every citizen knows their purpose, as brutal intimidation of the subjugated districts. The televised games are broadcasted throughout Panem as the 24 participants are forced to eradicate their competitors, literally, with all citizens required to watch. The main character throughout the series is a 16-year-old girl from District 12 named Katniss Everdeen.