The Giver Movie vs.The Giver Book Have you ever read a book and watched its movie and thought that the movie was nothing like the book? The Giver’s story was not adapted well onto the big screen. There were many changes that were made, some of which completely altered the whole course of the storyline. For example, Fiona working at the Nurturing Center instead the House of the Old and the characters taking injections instead of pills also changed the way Jonas acted especially towards Fiona throughout the entire movie Some of the many trivial changes that were made did not affect the movie as much. In the movie, Fiona is assigned to work at the Nurturing Center instead of the the House of the Old, the place where she was actually …show more content…
Jonas began to stop taking the injection each morning after a while, because he liked the way the Stirrings made him feel warm inside. Jonas also found a way to trick the system into skipping the daily injection by putting a drop of his blood on an apple and then putting the apple on the injector. This would make the system inject the serum to stop the Stirrings in the apple instead of Jonas. He convinced Fiona to do this too because he wanted her to feel the same way he felt towards her. This shows that Fiona trusts Jonas because she was breaking a major rule of the community. In the book, Jonas hardly ever talks to Fiona about the Stirrings and does not trick the system. He just decides to stop taking the pills. Overall, this makes the whole movie more dramatic and intense. Movie adaptations can sometimes be accurate, but in this case, the movie for The Giver was not. Most of the changes made were minor and didn't affect the story. One of the minor changes was that The Giver, Jonas, and Gabe did not have pale eyes but had marks on their wrists instead. Some changes completely affected the plot. The major changes, Fiona’s job being different and the characters taking injections instead of pills, made the whole movie more dramatic and different from the
The Actors in “The Truman Show” knew exactly what was going on, where to be, and where everything is, while in The Giver the people living in the community did not know that they were being controlled and that everything was the same. They thought that that was how everybody lives and didn’t think anything of it. “The Truman Show” has more action this way because you see them trying to cover up for Truman and trying not to let him know, while in The Giver only the directors know and they did a pretty good job making everything the same which can get pretty boring because nobody is trying to make a change or cover up until Jonas starts learning what everything really is. Before then everything stayed the same as always with no mistakes or
In the novel, The Joy Luck Club, by Amy Tan, it tells of four Chinese women drawn together in San Francisco to play mah jong, and tell stories of the past. These four women and their families all lived in Chinatown and belong to the First Chinese Baptist Church. They were not necessarily religious, but found They could improve their home China. This is how the woo's, the Hsu's, the Jong's and the St Clair's met in 1949.
The first main difference was Asher and Fiona's Assignments. This was an important difference because when changing their Assignments, they were able to help Jonas in the movie. The second main difference was a similarity between all Receivers. In the book, they similarly used light eyes to define the Receiver of Memory, but in the movie, it was having a certain birthmark. The final difference was the Chief Elder's role. The Chief Elder was not mentioned a lot in the Giver book, but in the movie, she was one of the main characters. In conclusion, the Giver book and movie are very different from each
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Lois Lowry’s book “The Giver” is about a community that has no flaws and everything is very controlled. They have no good or bad memories they just live their lives doing the jobs they were assigned. One day, Jonas, the new receiver, had an idea to release the memories back into the community. The story was later turned into a film and had some similarities, but the director of the movie departed from Lowry’s original story in a number of ways. By examining the different tones and the changes in a few of the characters, it's clear that the film departs from the story.
When one examines the similarities between Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, and The Giver by Lois Lowry, they may be baffled. They may think that Lowry just did a run off of Huxley's highly successful masterpiece. The similarities are extraordinary, but so are their differences. Many aspects of these novels are almost identical while others are completely foreign to each other. Both of these novels feature structured societies, but the societies are not the same. In Brave New World, there are no families or definite partners, but neither society believes in love or true family. The Giver has no specific caste system, but the members of their community do not have control of their own future; that is left to the elders of the community. Lastly are Jonas and John. They are basically the main characters and both endure severe inner troubles, but are they similar enough to make the novels similar?
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
Of the many changes made between the book and the movie, most were made to keep the audience interested in the story. Most people who watch TV don’t have a long attention span. Executives at NBC didn’t want to spend millions to produce a movie and then have nobody watch it. The screenwriters had to throw in some clever plot twists to keep people interested. Another reason the movie was different from the book was the material in the book was a little too racy for network TV. Take the ending, for example, nobody wants to see a grown man hang himself. This was a reason the producers had to change some material in the movie.
The Glass Castle is a memoir written by Jeannette Walls was released in 2005. The movie was released December 7th, 2017, and was based upon that memoir. The screenplay writers were Destin Daniel Cretton, Marti Noxon, and Andrew Lanham. Unlike many others, I was impressed with the movie as a whole. The movie does not exactly line up with the memoir, but the movie gives sufficient visuals for what Jeannette and her siblings endured. The characters lived up to their roles for the most part which gives support to the movie. There are a few scenes missing in the movie version, but the scenes that are included do justice for portraying Jeannette’s experiences to her readers.
The Giver is actually one of my all-time favorite books, so I’ve looked into why she left the book so inconclusive in the past. The Giver is basically about a boy named Jonas who lives in a perfect society. He lives in a household with his two parents and his little sister Lilly. When he becomes a 12, he goes through a huge ceremony and all the elders assign them their jobs. In this community, there is no lying, stealing, racism, pain, sunlight or color. Jonas was chosen to be The Receiver, and he didn’t know what to do because this job was such a big deal. Jonas then goes through training with the current Receiver, who is now The Giver. Training consists of The Giver passing down the memories from when the community was not what it is today. Memories that are passed down are things that are normal to us. Memories of sun, snow, pain, and sorrow.
The novel Speak, written by Laurie Halse Anderson is about a girl, who gets raped in the summer before the start of her freshman year in high school and the book follows her as she tries to cope with the depression that comes that kind of violation. This book was turned into a movie; and released early in the early 2000’s and when adapting books to film, a lot of information and details are lost in the process. When comparing Speak the novel and Speak the movie, the noticeable differences are; the character relationships, Melinda’s character, and Andy Evans and Melinda’s dynamic.
Horrifying, heartbreaking, uplifting, and inspiring; it is hard to believe these four adjectives can all be used to describe Sapphire’s novel, Push and the 2009 movie based on it, Precious. Portraying, albeit differently, the harsh life of Claireece “everybody call me Precious” (6) Jones, both mediums deliver powerful messages of revulsion, sympathy, and hope in their representations of the realities the young African-American girl faced and struggled to overcome. Although, the overall story remains consistent in the transition from novel to film there are also notable differences, some large and others seemingly more trivial, which affect the observer’s emotional reactions. Changes in portrayal method, overall concept, and minor admissions work together, making the movie, although poignant, somewhat less effective.
In the book, The Giver, Jonas is portrayed as a kind, curious and rebellious individual with a keen sense of awareness. The beginning chapters revealed Jonas as a very naive and compliant person, similar to everyone else in his community. Instances, when he was a child and got reprimanded for small misunderstandings, made him like this. However, throughout the book, Jonas has grown into an independent and determined person, someone who wants to make a change. Jonas finds new strengths in his character which forms him into someone spectacular and distinctive.
The apple in The Giver symbolizes change. In Jonas’s visions he “had noticed, following the path of the apple through the air with this eyes, that the piece of fruit had-well, this was the part he couldn't adequately understand - the apple had changed. Just for an instant.” (21-22) This shows Jonas has the power to see beyond, he is experiencing the color red. Change may happen even by accident but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad. Such as in this case where changing continuously allowed Jonas to help others constantly by taking the burden of all the pain in the world because of a mistake in genetic engineering. As you can tell sameness, precision, and indistinguishable people doesn’t mean perfection. Change is necessary to allow everyone a chance to grow, to experience, to grow as a person and in their jobs, to be unique, and different. That way
In conclusion, Lois Lowry’s ending of The Giver was poorly thought through and her decision of leaving it up to the reader to decide what shall happen was not the right choice and likely just a lazy excuse. If a story’s resolution is not properly done, as is the case with The Giver, then the reader will be left uncertain with what truly occurs. When readers are finished with The Giver, they are left with unanswered questions, such as what happens to Jonas and Gabriel and whether they die or not. This question could be answered by using evidence, yet, it cannot be confirmed, for anything could occur. Using evidence, it would seem likely that Jonas and Gabriel would have died. I find that The Giver was an outstanding book in general, however, I dislike the ending as it does not explain what happens to the community or what happens to Jonas and Gabriel.