The Armenian Genocide can be labelled as a very controversial topic. Many people argue that the massacre of Armenians was considered a genocide. On the other hand, an abundance of people along with the Turks deny the event to be a genocide even till this day. The Turkish government deliberately had an intent to isolate and destroy the Armenians. They had an organized plan to carry out the killings and the acts of the Turkish government can be considered as the destruction of Armenians, not just the killings of them. The mass murder of this specific group of people during World War One should be identified as a genocide not only in this course but around the world as well.
The genocides of the 20th century which occurred in Rwanda and Germany had striking similarities, something that should have alerted the world to stop them. At the core of these two massacres, patterns existed that outlined how similar thinking and reasoning could lead to something as horrible as these two events. One can see how both groups used their command of knowledge as a way to control the people, how the rest of the world refused to step up to stop the killings, and how the people were thought of as less than humans to provide a just cause for such terrible acts.
Most people agree that mistreating someone simply because of one’s religion is unethical. Why then, has there been so much hate and religious discrimination throughout history? This religious intolerance and discrimination has led to many wars, murders, and genocides. One of the most horrific genocides in history is the Armenian Genocide. For many years the Armenian population prospered, but by the sixteenth century, Armenia was brought under the rule of the Ottoman Empire. The majority of the people in the Ottoman Empire were Muslim, which made the Christian Armenians a small minority with little power. Growing conflict between the Muslims and Christians in the Ottoman Empire eventually led to the mass murder and deportation of Armenians from the Ottoman Empire in 1915. They were arrested, taken from their homes, and killed, simply because they were Christian (Armenian Genocide). This paper will discuss the history of Armenians, the events of the Armenian genocide, and the experiences of the children during the genocide.
The Armenian Genocide eliminated seventy-five percent of the Armenian population in the twentieth century. Innocent Armenians were put into slave labor, tortured, and shot. Men were brought to the outskirts of their town to be shot dead or were forced to convert. Women, children and the elderly were forced to leave their homes to enter death marches toward the Syrian Desert or were sexually abused by the Muslim Turks. But for what reasons were the Armenians the target of this gruesome event? The reasons included the Armenians’ religion, the jealousy of the Turks, and the nationalism of the Turks.
Genocide has been affecting many people; one event that became well known was the Holocaust. The term Genocide was made in 1944 by Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin, who combined the Greek words geno (race) with the Latin word cide (kill). Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention of and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide states “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: Killing members in a group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to member of a group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical or destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, or forcibly transferring children of the group to another group” (Overview: Defining Genocide). Genocide is is made up of individual acts and individual choices to perform them. The Holocaust was one of the most noticed genocides, the holocaust started in 1933 when adolf hitler came to power. The holocaust is an example of genocides because it specifically targeted jewish people. Overall 6 million jews were killed, the holocaust also targeted other groups because of their racial inferiority, political, ideological, and behavioral grounds including the: Gypsies, the disabled, and some of the Slavic people. On September 1941 more than 33,000 jews were killed in just two days. Although many people believe...
The analysis of this empowering term is fairly self-explanatory when the time is taken to break it down. Linda Jacobs Altman author of Genocide The Systematic Killing of a People claims that in 1944 the Greek word genos, meaning “race” or “tribe” and the Latin cide, which means “killing” were combined to result in the title of genocide. Altman states that today’s definition recognizes genocide as “Acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such”. A similar description has genocide as “A form of one-sided mass killing in which a state or other authority intends to destroy a group, as that group and membership in it are defined by the perpetrator”(Altman). Due to genocide being a worldwide issue, definitions have been known to cause controversy. Countries that represent perpetrators of past genocides often argue, on ridiculous terms, that their actions did not constitute a formal genocide. The breakdown of the word is helpful in the decision making process when determining if acts truly are those of genocide.
Genocide can be the result of a war, in ancient times many wars ended with enslavement or mass killing of the loosing group. In these ancient wars it was often seen as an assertion of power to be able to obliterate rival cities/countries from history. There are many cases in which a military group will commit an act of genocide with the hope that it will pacify a larger population of the same ethnic group. This can be seen with Persia burning Athens with the hopes of the rest of Greece submitting, or the Jewish people destroying all of Jericho and Ai leading to neighboring powers in Canaan allying themselves with the Israelites instead of facing the same brutality. Historically there is a precedence for brutality to the vanquished being used as a political maneuver. These acts were genocide by our standards but to the ancient civilization while atrocious were not always considered negative. In some cases such as the Iliad the sacking and destruction of Troy is considered a great victory by the Greeks, similarly the Jewish Conquest of Canaan is a point of Israeli pride. This establishes a precedence of respect for the perpetrators of genocide, they are conquering hero’s not homicidal maniacs.
In 1948 the United Nations declared genocide an international crime and approved the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this Convention describes genocide as: Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the grou...
One of the more recent, and one of the most unknown instances of Genocide would be that of Cambodia. In 1975 a Khmer Rouge party leader, "Pol Pot" attempted to centralize and nationalize the peasant farming society. He had planned to morph in accordance with the Chinese Communist model. Since it's ...
According to Dictionary.com Genocide is the “deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.” A few notable examples of genocide would be the War in Darfur, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Holocaust which are all among some of the worst genocides of the 20th century. The situation in Darfur is in part still going on today, while the Holocaust and Rwandan genocide are now a serious part of our world’s history. Each of these three genocides occurred due to political powers spinning out of control, and resulting in mass killings of those that the leaders did not favor. Although it seems that genocide is a part of history and it is put in the back of everyone’s minds, genocide does still exist today and will always be a part of people’s lives in this world.
The Armenian Genocide is a byproduct of tensions and clashes between the Turks and Armenians fueled by their ethnic and religious differences. For three thousand years, the Armenians thrived in Anatolia, an area where it stood as the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa. With its geographical advantage, the Armenian culture prospered along with the flourishing inventions and art. However by 16th century, Armenia was absorbed into the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was ruled by the Muslim Turks, governed by the Muslim sultan. Due to the religious difference, the Armenians, a Christian minority, were forced to live as second class citizens who were subjected to legal restrictions. The legal restrictions, which denied equal treatment of the Armenians such as discriminatory taxes and restricted participation in the Ottoman government implanted raging anger in Armenians. Despite such harsh situation, Armenians were generally better educated...
" Stanton, Greg H. "The Ten Stages of Genocide." Genocide Watch. N.p., 2013. Web. 16 Dec. 2013. .
Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity: "Armenians in Ottoman Turkey and the Armenian Genocide. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale, 2005. (Accessed March 20, 2014).
Genocide in the world is very much alive and continues to happen; it is estimated that since the year 1900, more than 170 million lives have been lost. If you were to think of that in size, it would be equal to the entire population of Nigeria, gone, wiped out of existence. After the holocaust of World War II, additional steps were taken to ensure history didn’t repeat itself. The Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was held in 1948, conducted by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) it concluded that, “genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations (UN) and condemned by the civilian world” (Schabas, n.d.). The Genocide Convention was the first human rights treaty adopted by the UNGA that defined genocide as “a crime of intentional destruction of a national, ethical, racial and religious group, in whole or in part” (Schabas, n.d.). We have taken action and even fought wars over it, but why does it continue to happen and why is it still present in our world today? In South Sudan, an ongoing political conflict between the current President, Salva Kiir, and the former Vice President, Riek Macha, has left the country divided and almost in a state of civil war. This has led to mass killings and violence, which have forced people to flee and left others in starvation. Everyone is watching this once promising new country implode, yet very little is being done to prevent it. At just three years old, Africa’s newest nation, South Sudan, is already facing turmoil due to ethnic and political rifts; if help and aid efforts do not increase, this country may be facing genocide.
Ever since Raphael Lemkin first came up with the word 'genocide' in late 1943, there has been disputes over many aspects even including its definition. The disputes about genocide always have been intense, because genocide is not merely an academic category used to account for historic and social phenomenon. Rather, it is a legal concept about a crime that needs to be prevented and punished. Because genocide is more of a pending issue of the international law than it is an issue of domestic law, the in-depth discussion on its definition, prevention and punishment has to be equally as complex. The facts that not a small number of the United Nations members is still refraining from concluding the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide since the United Nations General Assembly passed it on December 19, 1948, and also that the United States took 38 years to ratify the Convention show how challenging it is to define the term 'genocide' and to reach a consensus on its constitutive concepts.