Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essay on role of mass media in democracy
essay on role of mass media in democracy
the political functions of the mass media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essay on role of mass media in democracy
Ebony Booth 4726601
Explain the function of the mass media in promoting democracy. To what extent do you think the mass media succeeds in this function? Give TWO reasons for your view.
The conditions contributing to democracy have evolved significantly from the idea’s formation in Ancient Greece, where only a limited number of citizens participated. Today millions of people are involved in their countries democratic processes and therefore the process surrounding democracy have too changed. The continuation of modern democracy requires the mass media to connect the governing and the people. It is assumed that function of the media is to promote democracy. Thinkers have differing views of how the mass media supports democracy, this essay explore
The mass media is unsuccessful in promoting democracy.
The differing interpretations of what function the mass media plays in promoting democracy becomes problematic when evaluating the success said functions. Jacob Rowbottom identifies the functions as: acting as a public watchdog while providing diverse information and ideas (2010, pp. 609). While Strömbäck states there are three functions: preserving the flow of information, providing a forum for discussion of diverse and conflicting political ideas; and acting as a public watchdog against abuses of power (2005, pp. 332). Trappe & Maniglio formulate functions from democratic principles of freedom, equality and control and inclusion of Stromback’s ideas. The flow of information develops from freedom principles, public forum of diverse ideas and interest mediation; derives from notions of equality and public watchdog against the abuse of power comes from the control and transparency desired in democracy (2009, pp. 177-178). Two functions that are prominent in all the definitions presented are the role of the mass media to act as a public watchdog and providing diverse and translucent information. The public watchdog “…performs its democratic function by holding the government and other public
Trappe & Maniglio study into developed countries found that commercialisation of the media has a negative impact on supporting democracy “…the media, mainly driven by consumerist approaches, have gradually abandoned the public service mission of journalism.” (2009 pp.197). The public service model deems the role of the mass media is to provide different viewpoints to a wide audience, enabling citizens to interact with information of which they were are not aware or may disagree (Rowbottom 2010, pp. 614). The public service model promotes diversity of viewpoints as previously acknowledged this function is essential in supporting democratic ideas. The move away from the public service model of journalism allows for certain ideas to become dominant the mass media to increase profits however this is can be disastrous for democracy. This can be exhibited in Lithuania were “… the influence of powerful institutions is comparably high…” (Trappe & Maniglio, 2009 pp.197)Therefore Lithuania scored lowest in equality and interest mediation at only 60% in Trappe & Maniglio study into monitoring the media (2009 pp.197). An additional change in the mass media identified by Trappe & Maniglio is that the countries Lithuania and Portugal suffer from a lack of investment in resources for investigative reporting (Trappe & Maniglio, 2009 pp.197). The consequences of the lack of
The influence of the mass media on the electoral process in the western democracies, specially the television in the last years, can get to crush the daily life during the electoral period. Some maintain that the selection are won or are lost based on the performance of a party in the television and print media and, to a lesser extent, in the radio. Since the media nowadays dominates the selections in some countries, he is surprising that the regulation of the information has a low profile in the electoral legislations of the world.
In America we value the freedom of the press. The press is the one place where most Americans go to get educated on issues facing their community, state, and most of all nation. Everyone knows that the media plays a major role in Americans' lives; however their role of gatekeeper is not completely understood. The press decides which issues to report and how to report them. In order to improve the nation and world, the media should present their unbiased findings to allow people to make up their own minds. However, this is not the case. The media often shows its bias. Their widespread exposure enables them to communicate their ideas to the public, regardless of the public's responsiveness. The elections of officials for the federal government during the late 20th century serve as prime examples of their bias. An analysis of surveys, media delivery, and reporter's testimonies, I have found that the media is actually more out of touch with mainstream America than the politicians they cover.
First, the role of the media is to represent the public and intervene between the public and the government. The media is a mirror, which re...
The media also have an impact on voting behaviour. It is the main source of information about government and politics and contributes to the democratic process as it encourages political awareness amongst the public. There ...
In today’s society, more people use mass media sources such as Facebook, Twitter, (Internet users—21%) and major news corporations like Fox, CBS, and NBC, etc. (Television viewers—55%) for their information on politics and government (Saad). People have this information twenty-four hours a day, right at their fingertips. While these are quick and seemingly easy sources, they are not always the best choices because media companies are not always giving out information with the public’s best interest at heart. There are a large number of companies that focus on how much money they will bring in. The media, therefore, has an essential duty to always be truthful but also a duty not to betray the trust put into it by society. The media’s need for consistent viewers to bring in a profit is a prime example as to why this honestly is so important. This is where the issue of greed comes in. Media companies, while taking a stand on one side of an argument, are obligated to tell the truth so the public is well informed, but greed to get in the way: this greed results in lies and can have an impact on voters.
... small media reforms (like public journalism) will be enough to reduce the commercial and corporate imperatives driving our existing media systems (Hackett and Zhao, 1998, p. 235). Instead, a fundamental reform of the entire system is needed, together with a wider institutional reform of the very structures the media systems work within, our democracies. This will be a difficult task, due to powerful vested interests benefiting from the status quo, including media, political and economic elites. Reforms will need to be driven by campaigns mobilising public support across the political spectrum, to enable the citizens of the world to have a media system that works to strengthen democratic principles as opposed to undermining them. This task is challenging, but it will become easier once people begin to understand the media’s role in policymaking within our democracies.
They regroup the television, the radio, and newspapers. Aware of the power they have on us, media influence our thoughts, our acts, and our ideas in order to serve their interests. It isn't the purpose of this essay, but it would certainly not be too complicted to demonstrate that medias have a close link with politicians and that each one serve the interests of the others.
Mass media is a growing business, normally controlled by giant corporations. In fact majority of national news in only covered by few sources known as “Big Media” consisting of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Time magazine, and United Press International. (Mary 6). Because the media is so big often the corporations determine what is to be given national attention such as the presidential elections. Leaving the opinions of others to change american politics. Mass media has shaped the political system by using the method “Share This” a social media tactic, televising campaign ads or other political views, and by integrating “Live Media Debates”.
Hallin and Mancini’s conceptual framework comprises structures of four dimensions development of media markets, political parallelism or “the extent to which the media system reflects the major divisions in society”, the development of journalistic professionalism , and the degree and nature of state intervention in the media system; furthermore aspects of the state role; degree of pluralism, type of democracy, and degree of rational-legal authority with associating to the political contexts of media systems. Hallin and Mancini conceptualized the three models of media and politics when referring characteristic configurations within these dimensions. These are Mediterranean or Polarized Pluralist Model, North Central Europe or Democratic Corporatist Model, North Atlantic or Liberal Model. The principal features of Mediterranean or Polarized Pluralist Model are high political parallelism, low newspaper circulation, weaker professionalization, strong state intervention; North Central Europe or Democratic Corporatist Model consists high new...
In the US, mass media plays a significant role in politics. One of the key roles mass media plays in politics includes the airing of the platforms of various politicians. The media influences the view of people on politics and politicians. As the opinion of individuals is affected, the results of the votes are consequently changed (Holden, 2016).
Media is one the tools or channels of communication used to store and convey information or data from one source to the other. In the modern democracy, media play important functions. Mass media is considered essential in the modern democracy. When the media is given freedom of expression by the government. Madison argues that democratic government require informed and educated society for it to work effectively (166). He further affirms that democracy also imposes problem and require an institutional solution. The 1789 constitution of United States of America was meant to give the solution regarding the democracy.
The current role of mass media in politics has definitely played a significant role in how view and react to certain events and issues of the nation. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are some of the ways information is passed onto many of the citizens. The World Wide Web is also an information superhighway, but not all of the sources on the Internet are credible. Therefore, I will only focus on the main three types of media: written, viewed, and audible, and how they affect whether or not democracy is being upheld in the land of the free. The media includes several different outlets through which people can receive information on politics, such as radio, television, advertising and mailings. When campaigning, politicians spend large quantities of money on media to reach voters, concentrating on voters who are undecided. Politicians may use television commercials, advertisements or mailings to point out potentially negative qualities in their opponents while extolling their own virtues. The media can also influence politics by deciding what news the public needs to hear. Often, there are more potential news stories available to the media than time or space to devote to them, so the media chooses the stories that are the most important and the most sensational for the public to hear. This choice can often be shaped,
"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." This quote by A.J. Liebling illustrates the reality of where the media stands in today's society. Over the past twenty years there has been an increase in power throughout the media with regard to politics. The media's original purpose was to inform the public of the relevant events that occurred around the world. The job of the media is to search out the truth and relay that news to the people. The media has the power to inform the people but often times the stories given to the public are distorted for one reason or another. Using slant and sensationalism, the media has begun to shape our views in society and the process by which we choose our leaders. There was once a time when the government used the media as a medium to influence voters, committees, communities etc. Recently, it has been the presidents of major media outlets that have not only exercised power over the public but also made their presences felt in government and in the halls of congress. When the word democracy is thrown about it usually has to do with the rights or original intentions for a group or organization. The first group intended to be influenced by the media was the informed voter. Political parties along with the government used a variety of media resources to persuade the voter or in effect receive a vote for their cause. Returning to the thought of ?democracy? the question is, what was the original intention of the media with relation to the theme of democracy and the informed voter? To analyze this thought thoroughly one must first grasp an understanding of the basic definition of democracy.
In our democratic society, mass media is the driving force of public opinion. Media sources such as Internet, newspaper, news-broadcasts, etc, play significant roles in shaping a person’s understanding and perception about the events occurred in our daily lives. But how much influence does the mass media poses on our opinion? Guaranteed by the First Amendment in American Constitution, the media will always be there to inform us about the different events or issues they feel are important for the public. The media constantly bombards us with news, advertisements, etc, wher...
Throughout the history, media have always been used as a powerful instrument to manipulate people and to create thoughts, reactions, and actions for the benefit of the power owners. This does not mean that there was no time when media and journalism were used for the sake of good and were obliged to nothing but the truth. However, the dark side of its usage is far outweighed than its real aim nowadays. Like in 1984, media and journalism have a significant influence in shaping thoughts and maybe the most efficient role to strengthen the power of the ruler, in this case the Party. While the purpose of journalism is to provide information to people in order to make them free and let them free to make the best possible decision about their societies, governments, lives, and so on; there is a fact that the media is far from being in such way both in Orwell’s novel and in Turkey.