The Four P's Framework Of Foreign Policy

1326 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: foreign policy and diplomacy

The four P’s framework of foreign policy simply put is the “influences of the foreign policy”. It’s the four basic and inferred ideas in which we the United States of America are founded upon. The four basic ideas are Power, Peace, Prosperity and Principle; they not only determine our selections but the choices of most other countries. These four basic goals of nations make “states” behavior and the effect of their behavior very predictable.
The Four Ps of framework of foreign policy is the idea that all state behavior and outcome of their behavior is predictable based on the simple idea that all states go to war for these four reasons. Although our policy states that all acts of war are for the “preservation of independence and territory” it is understood by all other states that we, the United States of …show more content…

The nucleus of power within a nation is self- defense and a need for global interdependence of nations. We the United States for example achieved peace by making a global alliance within countries. An alliance that took off with the four greatest super powers or what people frequently refer to as the constabulary of the United Nations and 47 other states. After the near world domination by Germany of other lands, nations agreed that a world government was necessary in society to maintain peace amongst nations to prevent future conflicts against nations. All states that denied this proposal were considered as threats to the superpowers and most importantly the US. Deterrence is the global view that the US is too strong and too powerful to go to war with so by fear of retaliation,

Show More
Related

  • National Security Structure Development in Steven Hook and John Spanier's Book, American Foreign Policy Since WWII

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy - Roosevelt Corollary

    1125 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roosevelt Corollary greatly affected American foreign policy. It was in sharp contrast to the Monroe Doctrine, put in place to stop foreign intervention with the American continents. In 1823 President Monroe implemented US policy that stated European powers were not allowed to colonize or interfere with the newly budding United States or the Americas. In 1904 President Roosevelt expanded upon this policy in response to European intervention with Latin America. This policy became known as the Roosevelt Corollary. The document echoed the style of leadership President Roosevelt became synonymous with. This more aggressive form of policy became known as Big Stick Diplomacy. Foreign policy in the United States would forever be changed by President Roosevelt’s reinterpretation of the Monroe Document. The Roosevelt Corollary would later go on to affect decisions the United States made in regards to the Cold War, Cuba, The Middle East and many more. To understand the impact of this, we must look back to the Monroe Doctrine.

    Read More

  • The Five Strategic Goals Of Woodrow Wilson's Foreign Policy

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson was the 28th President of the United States and held the office from 1913-1921. He became known as “the Crusader” due to his foreign policy theory that America should be a beacon of liberty and aggressively pursue the spread of democracy throughout the world. His policy would enable America to prosper economically and develop an international security community through the promotion of democracy in other nations. While former Secretary of State Kissinger writes in his book Diplomacy that 20th century American foreign policy has been driven by Wilsonian idealism, an analysis of 21st century US foreign policy reveals that, in fact, US foreign policy has been influenced by ideals that can be characterized as Hamiltonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian as well.

    Read More

  • Analyzing America's Shift in Foreign Policy

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...d by examining the statements made by such politicians - particularly, and in this instance nearly, exclusively, Woodrow Wilson - which demonstrate a newly formed drive to intervene in nations outside of the Americas in order to provide for peace, democracy and self-determination. Moreover, whether these new intentions may exist for positive and truthful, or negative and elusive reasons, they most certainly were not consistent with traditional American values on foreign policy, as previous sentiments inherent to, and precipitated by, such foundational principles as the Monroe Doctrine are entirely contradictory. Thus, in complete summary, one may arrive at two, primary conclusions: namely, that not only was this shift caused by economic and ideological factors, but that such motives disembarked from preceding sentiments on America’s involvement in foreign affairs.

    Read More

  • US Foreign Policy During the 20th Century

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is the intention of this essay to explain the United States foreign policy behind specific doctrines. In order to realize current objectives, this paper will proceed as follows: Part 1 will define the Monroe Doctrine, Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 will concurrently explicate the Roosevelt Corollary, Good Neighbor Policy, and the Nixon Doctrine, discuss how each policy resulted in U.S. involvement in Latin American countries, describe how it was justified by the U.S. government, respectively, and finally, will bring this paper to a summation and conclusion.

    Read More

  • Moral Idealism In Foreign Policy

    1758 Words  | 4 Pages

    Foreign Policy is a very common topic today. Foreign Policy is the strategy or process when dealing with other nations. There are two different types of Foreign policy used which are Moral Idealism and Political Realism. They both have their own way of running external things from their country the best one is Moral Idealism.

    Read More

  • American Foreign Policy in World War II

    1612 Words  | 4 Pages

    To understand the United States’ involvement in these wars, we must first be aware of the role each of these policies plays within our nation and the importance of these four objectives to the American people. Democracy, which is the classic liberal political tradition, ensures the right of the people to determine their own government and is the foundation upon which our nation was founded. Manifest Destiny is defined as the responsibility to work to living in social harmony, or the belief that the U.S. is to show everyone how to live best in mutual striving and social harmony. Humanitarianism is described as the doctrine of ethics and humility toward the welfare of mankind worldwide. Economic expansion refers to increasing the American market overseas, which in turn guarantees jobs for the American middle class. These four objectives have been key factors in the defining and shaping of our country throughout its history, and they continue to influence our nation on the global spectrum as we enter the 21st century.

    Read More

  • austrailia foreign policy

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    What is Foreign Policy? Foreign Policy is a nations’ attitude, actions (ie economic sanctions, peacekeeping, military activity) as well as our dealings with other countries (ie trade, immigration, aid, defence) and anything that is directed towards preserving and furthering certain national interests. Foreign Policy seeks to maintain national security, promote economic and trade interests, expand regional and global links, and promote the nation as a good global citizen.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Essay

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    To understand the power struggle relating to foreign policymaking, it is crucial to understand what foreign policy entails. The Foreign Policy Agenda of the U.S. Department of State declares the goals of foreign policy as "to build and sustain a more democratic, secure, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community." While this definition is quite vague, the actual tools of foreign policy include Diplomacy, foreign aid, and military force.

    Read More

  • American Imperialism

    746 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the late 19th and 20th century, the United States pursues an aggressive policy of expansionism, extending its political, military, and economic influence across the globe. The events during this ‘age of imperialism’ laid the foundation for America’s international power while simultaneously defining the use of the these powers. The policy that the United States implemented at this time is known as Big Stick Diplomacy which was to speak softly but carry a big stick. This meant that the United States would ask for something or take a stance on an issue and if another nation refused or went against the United States, then the military would be summoned to ‘resolve’ the issues. This domineering foreign policy defined the politics of American Imperialism that was especially prevalent from 1890-1913.

    Read More

  • US Foreign Policy

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    government. An example of these interests is gaining territory which is under the control of

    Read More

  • International Relations

    2631 Words  | 6 Pages

    The first paradigm of international relations is the theory of Realism. Realism is focused on ideas of self-interest and the balance of power. Realism is also divided into two categories, classical realism and neo-realism. Famous political theorist, Hans Morgenthau was a classical realist who believed that national interest was based on three elements, balance of power, military force, and self interest (Kleinberg 2010, 32). He uses four levels of analysis to evaluate the power of a state. The first is that power and influence are not always the same thing. Influence means the ability to affect the decision of those who have the power to control outcomes and power is the ability to determine outcomes. An example of influence and power would be the UN’s ability to influence the actions of states within the UN but the state itself has the power to determine how they act. Morgenthau goes on to his next level of analysis in which he explains the difference in force and power in the international realm. Force is physical violence, the use of military power but power is so much more than that. A powerful state can control the actions of another state with the threat of force but not actually need to physical force. He believed that the ability to have power over another state simply with the threat of force was likely to be the most important element in analysis the power of as state (Kleinberg 2010, 33-34).

    Read More

  • Political Realism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...ous situations, possibly because these studies have attributed motive and action to the states rather than to the decision-makers within them. Thus, foreign relations and policies can truly be strengthened when people can view and truly appreciate international issue in many different perspectives, such as realist, idealist, liberalist, constructivism, feminist, world economic system analysis, etc. When people are able to see issues and solutions to problems in many different ways world peace might be reachable.

    Read More

  • The Realist Approach to International Relations

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    To conclude, there are four main components of the realist approach to international relations, they are: state which includes egoism as the states are composed by the selfish people, self-help which includes balance of power as power is used to enhance the survival rate, survival which includes hegemony in order to maintain its position and anarchical system which related to lust for power and led to security dilemma.

    Read More

  • American Hegemony in the Twenty-First Century: Consensus and Legitimacy

    6585 Words  | 14 Pages

    Eagle Rules? Foreign Policy and American Primacy in the Twenty-First Century. Ed. Robert J. Lieber. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002. 152-172.

    Read More

More about The Four P's Framework Of Foreign Policy

Open Document