The Following: Analysis Sources

693 Words3 Pages
“The Following” Summary of the Source Charles Manson is a concise maniac who led a cultural cult that killed based on Manson’s “prophetic” message in the Beatles song “Helter Skelter.” He believed that there was going to be a war between blacks and whites; the blacks would execute the whites. Manson and “The Family” would be safe throughout this war because of their underground safe house. However, after winning this war, blacks would not have the knowledge of how to rule properly, therefore, the remaining white people would take over with Manson as the head of the new world. When this did not begin, Manson and his many followers or “family” that also believed in “Helter Skelter” helped him to kill well-known people in hopes that it would start the race war. Manson connects to a few theorists’ definition of religion, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim. Manson identified more with attitude toward religion, while his followers demonstrated Durkheim’s theory better. However, Manson’s view was not a clear match for Eliade’s view of religion. Analysis of the Source Emile Durkheim “believed religion was the very cement that held society together.” His view of religion was all about community, while Manson’s followers were the community. “The Family” became a cult-type society and according to Durkheim, each society has its’ own rituals that strengthen their dependence on the society. Manson’s followers had to prove to Manson that they were dedicated to him by taking part in horrendous acts of violence leading to murder. Durkheim might say that the killing was a ritualistic act in their self made society. “For Durkheim, religion and society are inseparable and –to each other virtually indispensable” (Pals 86). Perhaps the ... ... middle of paper ... ...inary, random, and unimportant. Of course, to Eliade, the profane did not hold as much meaning as the sacred; while Durkheim was more concerned about society and its needs. He described profane as vanishing and fragile, while the sacred was eternal and full of substance. He also tied religion to archaic people, “those who have lived in the world of nature,” (Pals 198). Archaic people want to live life in the model of the divine because they have a deep longing for paradise, and to be close to God. …Believed people looked back with a feeling of nostalgia along with the sacred and profane. Sources Jordan, Anne, Neil Lockyer, and Edwin Tate. Philosophy of Religion for A Level. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes, 2002. Google Books. 2004. Web. 11 Nov. 2013. Pals, Daniel L. Eight Theories of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2006. Print.
Open Document