More handpicked essays just for you.
The significance of space exploration
Hardest part of writing a persuasive essay
The significance of space exploration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The debate about space exploration has been raging on for decades, people on both sides of the issue vehemently arguing their point of view. However despite the possible risk space exploration has the potential to change humanity for the better, and doing so is well worth the risk. This essay will elaborate some of the plethora of ways that space exploration could benefit mankind.
Overpopulation is fast becoming a serious problem on earth, the exponential growth rate of the human race could have a disastrous effect on earth and it's recourses. (overpopulation citation) The growing population size has drained many of the worlds natural resources, and caused the depletion of many species. Earth will not be able to support humanities continued growth. Populations can only grow to their environments maximum threshold to support life, human beings are the first species on earth that has the ability to go beyond this barrier and colonize another environment for continued population growth. Not taking advantage of this opportunity would be throwing away humanities future.
The ethical implications of space exploration and colonization are a widely debated topic, many people have begun to question what ethical right we have to colonize another planet given the way humans have polluted and destroyed our own planet. This assertion is somewhat logically flawed in that rapidly increasing population and urbanization are largely responsible for the damage being done to the natural environment, and colonation of other planets would drastically reduce these problems by giving humans more environments to inhabit and draw resources from.
Colonizing other planets would alleviate the earth's overpopulation problem, leading to the continued prospe...
... middle of paper ...
...ithout doing so may lead to the end of humanity as we know it.
Works Cited
Citation Page
Livingston, David. "Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?" 21 Jan. 2008. The Space eview: Essays and Commentary About the Final Frontier. 4 March 2008 http://www.thespacereveiw.com/article/1040/1>
Chamberlain, Andrew. "Pennies of Each Federal Spending Dollar." 7 Apr. 2006. The Tax oundation. 1 March 2008
McLean, Margeret R. "To Boldly Go: Ethical Considerations for Space Exploration." Feb. 006. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. 29 Feb. 2008
Greenberg, Richard, and B. Randall Tufts. "Infecting Other Worlds." American Scientis Jul-Aug.2001. 24 Feb. 2008
Garret Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” is an article that identifies the nation’s current problems and predicaments that can’t be resolved through the use of technical solutions. Hardin’s work heavily focuses on overpopulation, a prominent and unceasing issue that significantly distorts and affects the stability of the Earth and the abundance of the planet’s resources. In his article, he mentioned some reasonable and important solutions to overpopulation, but he also explained its downside and how the said solutions may not be ideal and practical. “Tragedy of the Commons” revealed that the human population will continue to flourish and how it will be greatly detrimental to our society unless individuals get the education that they need and
As a country we need to start investing more money and research into space technology. Programs currently exist for this effort, but the potential for research and progress is limited by a lack of funding; compared to other government funded programs, aerospace funding is pitiful. Continued research in space technology is a necessary step in our growth and development not just as a country but also as entire human race. If we are to achieve this goal, it is necessary to increase funding for space research and technology and consider the possibility of colonizing outer space. If we limit our existence to the planet Earth, and continue to drain the resources on this planet, we will destroy the only home we have.
Analyzing human obligation pertaining to all that is not man made, apart from humans, we discover an assortment of concerns, some of which have been voiced by philosophers such as Tom Regan, Peter Singer and Aldo Leopold. Environmentally ethical ideals hold a broad spectrum of perspectives that, not only attempt to identify a problem, but also focus on how that problem is addressed through determining what is right and wrong.
With all the problems we have on earth and how much we don’t know about our own planet we shouldn’t be colonizing others. We may have the science but we don’t have the funds. We also have tons of willing people but not enough physically and mentally able to colonize a planet. Children are starving all around the world, People are homeless, and wars are starting. Humankind needs to achieve some sort of world peace before trying to explore space. Also, humans will end up destroying life if we try to colonize an
When you first consider the prospect of a mars colony, the first things that come to mind are only the positive outcomes. Only when you look deeper into this expidition do you start to see the enormous cost and extreme dangers associated with traveling to this planet. What people also fail to realize or comprehend are the political and socio-economic repercussions of furthering our advancement to colonizing the red planet. As a nation in this day and age, I do not think we should undergo a full scale colonization of mars. While this prospect is an optimistic and hopeful vision, we have issues that need to be resolved on our own planet before we start to inhabit another, lest the dilemmas of our homeworld should follow us to mars.
It is within man’s blood and nature to explore, and space is our next New World. Man’s first achievement in space travel was the launch of the Sputnik on October 4, 1957. For the next decades, space travel was roaring like a rocket, fueled by man’s desire to explore, man’s desire for knowledge, and man’s desire to beat his enemies. However, these impulses have died out as the well of government funding has been diverted to wars and debts, and the interest of the American people has been diverted to wars and debts. Amidst all these issues it is debated as to whether or not space travel is worth the money and the attention of scientists, particularly since humanity faces so many issues on earth currently. However, because of the past inventions, current services, and future benefits, space travel is indeed worth the money and attention of governments and people. It is within our hands to control man’s advancement, and space travel is the next venue to do so.
The value and importance of studying the Humanities in the twenty-first century is emphasised through the analysis of today’s politics via an Orwellian lens. Products of the Humanities, such as novels, are important as they provide a scope through which humanity is viewed and pose significant questions. George Orwell’s 1984 critiques totalitarian regimes and authoritarian governments. The state of today’s politics suggests that we have built a society similar to that which Orwell condemns in 1984, reminding us of the value and importance in studying Literature and Politics, and the Humanities as a whole, in the twenty-first century to critique the society that we live in. To evaluate this assertion - with an explicit focus on 1984 - the novel’s main themes of deceptive language and the manipulation of facts should be analysed to assess to what extent the political sphere of the twenty-first century replicates that of 1984.
Humans have dreamed of leaving the earth and traveling space for many years, and up to this day they have taken many steps in the right direction. Yet, with every new frontier they approach, new problems loom over the horizon. All problems involved with space exploration may not directly involve space itself. Many of those problems surface right here on Earth. Some of the easier issues have been resolved, such as escaping the forces of gravity to reach outer space. More of these problems are far more arduous and the solutions need more time to be worked out properly. In “The Coming Schism” by James E. and Alcestis R. Oberg, humans have already begun colonizing space, yet there are still new problems arising. Major problems such as financing, communication and culture conflicts are important in the journey to space, because they all have the potential to disrupt progress.
In general, terraforming is morally recommended. Terraforming another planet would provide valuable classes for the intelligent management of Earth’s biosphere. Environmentalists have for some time maintained the acquisition of this kind of knowledge as an ethical duty. Absent unforeseen objections and regarding humankind as the central or most important element of existence of scientific and aesthetic value, terraforming is project humans ought to keep in mind
However, the discussion of whether mankind should proceed with space colonization often ends in a deadlock. Advocates would agree that it is a worthwhile endeavour that could preserve mankind. On the contrary, sceptics point out that humanity has other pressing problems, and the pursuit of space colonization would divert resources from addressing such problems.
As such, this essay will argue that space exploration is a necessity of our kind and that NASA should be progressively more financed. To begin with, space research has helped bring several developments to modern science, affecting the quality of our everyday lives. With issues like climate change, and population overgrowth, our species faces the risks of major extinction (4). Climate change has been a man-made problem in recent years that threatens our planet. It will take huge mitigations from current and future societies to even come close to reversing climate change.
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.
“Unless humanity is suicidal, it should want to preserve, at the minimum, the natural life-support systems and processes required to sustain its own existence” (Daily p.365). I agree with scientist Gretchen Daily that drastic action is needed now to prevent environmental disaster. Immediate action and changes in attitude are not only necessary for survival but are also morally required. In this paper, I will approach the topic of environmental ethics from several related sides. I will discuss why the environment is a morally significant concern, how an environmental ethic can be developed, and what actions such an ethic would require to maintain and protect the environment.
Some may think exploring outer space is simply a human’s curiosity. This is true but on the contrary, people explore to learn about things they may have never known and touch on the essence of the creation of the universe. Another reason for exploring this uncharted area is the technological advancements people have made and immense amount of innovation they have achieved in this field (Wood). Lastly, scientists study the other planets just in case one day humans need to relocate after overwhelming damage has been done to Earth. Suffice to say, it is a vital part of today’s day and age to research outer space (Rothery).
Recently, the colonization of the planet Mars has been a popular topic, whether it is on the internet, in everyday discussions or even among politicians. On the one hand, many believe that Mars is a viable solution to the problem caused by overpopulation and pollution by serving as a habitat for humans due to its similar environment and composition. On the other hand, scientific limitations and ethical concerns make it difficult for others to believe that Mars is a possible alternative solution to Earth’s problems. Its thin atmosphere and lack of liquid water on the surface make living on Mars impossible with today’s limited technology. Besides some scientific limitations, there are also ethical questions that arise concerning the project and what will be done when it is achieved.