The Fall Of Rome And The End Of Civilization Analysis

802 Words2 Pages

By the 1970s, Historian Peter Brown sparked an interesting debate about the Roman civilization. He dubbed a period in Roman history, ‘The Late Antiquity’, starting around 200 AD and lasting up until the eighth century, marking this was a period in time where the Roman civilization was not in decline, but in a state of transformation due to religious and cultural revolution, and causing many historians to agree or debate about this matter. Bryan Ward-Perkins, author of The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization, critique the theory of ‘The Late Antiquity’ and firmly believe the decline of Roman civilization instead of its transformation influenced by its barbaric invaders. He supports his position of Rome’s Fall with evidence from the diminishing Ward-Perkins raised an issue about pottery made by the Romans after the invasion of barbarians and transformation of the empire, “Three features of Roman pottery are remarkable, and not to be found again for many centuries in the West: its excellent quality and considerable standardization; the massive quantities in which it was produced; and its widespread diffusion [geographically and socially]… after the end of the Roman world, this level of sophistication is not seen again until perhaps the fourteenth century, some 800 years later” (Ward-Perkins, 88). The production of pottery made by Romans was a phenomenon. Ward-Perkins pointed out before the fall of Rome, Roman pottery were made in excellent quality and in massive quantities that it spread out throughout the Mediterranean world ,and regardless of the location it was transported and traded everywhere throughout the empire and people of differing social class were able to afford it because of its production. The decline of pottery being made was only the start of the deteriorating empire. As an item used in the household ,so has the house begin to Ward-Perkins begin to compare the tiles used for roofing to pottery and how it was made in a similar process and sold like pottery. He discussed about how tiles used were used in Roman time were common like pottery, and after post Roman time, the building material begin to change, “... Every one of the building crafts introduced by the Romans, the mundane as well as the luxury ones, disappeared completely during the fifth century … All new buildings in the fifth and sixth centuries, whether in Anglo-Saxon or unconquered British areas, were either roofed in wood or thatch” (Ward-Perkins, 108). In areas used to be conquered by Romans during their golden age as an Empire, the people in territories in Britain forgot how to make their home out of bricks and tiles the Romans introduced after its fall, and live in poorer conditioned houses in post Roman times. Ward-Perkins highlight the details of why tiles were much more superior and practical usage, but also having more benefits than a thatch roof, but he pointed it out that this change could have been caused by cultural

Open Document