The Extent to Which Sources Agree that Russian Government Policy on Agriculture Constantly Fails and Peasants Resisted it Under the Tsarist

1083 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The economic policies that Lenin introduced

The Extent to Which Sources Agree that Russian Government Policy on Agriculture Constantly Fails and Peasants Resisted it Under the Tsarist

The definition of a peasant remains the same throughout the period

studied; 'A peasant is a person who permanantly lives and works on the

land'. The peasants resistance was either a physical or mental

movement where they opposed and refused to comply with new

agricultural reforms passed. The initial impressions gathered from

sources one to six is that consistant failure of agricultural policy

is dominant throughout, yet peasants resistance is not so easy to

detect.

The period covered by the sources, begin and end with consistant

agriculture failure. Sources 4, 5 and 6 show consistant policy failure

during the communist rule of Khrushchev. Source 6 written by Alex Nove

describes 'the picture as a whole was very disappointing', this

description agrees with the account given in source 4 that the Virgin

Lands Scheme was 'Poorly organised, with stupid decisions and

ill-concevied strategies',therefore supporting consistant failure.

Source 6 disagrees with source 4 as Nove believed that the failure of

the Virgin Lands Scheme was due to Krushchev inheritance of a

generation of 'neglect and impoverishment'. The source shows very

limited evidence of peasants resistance, except that they were treated

'with instintive suspicion', implying that if previous resistance had

not occured they would not have been treated this way.

Source 4, an extract from Edward Shevardnadse, describes Khrushchev's

Virgin Land Scheme. The source has a negative tone; 'we watched

helplessly', 'as the country began to break down'....

... middle of paper ...

...dership. The

peasants resistance continued to be a predominant problem for all

rulers when attempting to enforce new agricultural ideology, however

the sources only support the question to a slight extent due to lack

of evidence. The main factor of the failure of the agricultural

reforms was the inability of the rulers to meet the peasants needs and

compromise with them to realise their contribution to the success of

their plans. All of the sources show consistant failure, however the

extent of the failure depends on each source, and the sources show

higher incidents of agricultural failure rather than peasants

resistance. Although all of the sources are helpfull, their

reliability is limited and therefore more sources must be analysed to

discover the extent of the peasants resistance and the agricultural

failures.

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Tsar's Power Crumbled In 1917

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and population under sever economic and social conditions; consequently, during the late 19th century and early 20th century, various movements were staging demonstrations to overthrow the oppressive government. Poor involvement in WWI also added to the rising discontent against Nicholas as Russian armies suffered terrible casualties and defeats because of a lack of food and equipment; in addition, the country was industrially backward compared to countries such as Britain, France, Germany, and the USA. It had failed to modernize, this was to do with the tsars lack of effort for reforms. The country was undergoing tremendous hardships as industrial and agricultural output dropped. Famine and poor morale could be found in all aspects of Russian life. Furthermore, the tsar committed a fatal mistake when he appointed himself supreme commander of the armed forces because he was responsible for the armies constant string of defeats.

    Read More

  • Assess the impact of World War I on the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    No war is fought without the struggle for resources, and with Russia still rapidly lagging behind in the international industrialisation race by the turn of the 20th century, the stage was set for social unrest and uprising against its already uncoordinated and temporally displaced government. With inconceivable demands for soldiers, cavalry and warfare paraphernalia, Russia stood little chance in the face of the great powers of World War One. Shortages of basic human necessities led to countless subsistence riots and the eventual power struggle between the ruling body and its people. From the beginnings of WWI to 1916, prices of essential goods rose 131 percent in Moscow and more than 150 percent in Petrograd. Additionally, historian Walter G. Moss stated that in September 1915 that “there were 100,000 strikers in Russia; in October 1916, there were 250,000 in Petrograd alone.” Moss continues to exemplify the increasing evidence of social unrest and connects the riots to a lack of resources when he goes on to point out that “subsistence riots protesting high prices and shortages… also increased.” ...

    Read More

  • Comparing The Us Constitution

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the years leading up to World War I, social unrest among the Russian people was spreading rapidly. There was a huge social gulf between the peasants who were former serfs and the landowners. The peasants regarded anyone who did not work as a parasite. They had always regarded as all land belonging to them. They regarded any land retained by the landowners at the time serfs were freed as stolen and only force could prevent them from taking it back. By the time Russia entered the war, one peasant rebellion had already been suppressed and several socialist revolutionary movements were developing.

    Read More

  • The Failure of the Provisional Government and the Rise of the Bolsheviks

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Three "Whys" of the Russian Revolution, The Russian Revolution, and Rethinking the Russian Revolution. Writing of an annotated bibliography of the topic. 2. Selection and reading of the sources to determine which ones are the most relevant and comprehensive 3. Finding opposing arguments to give and analytical view with multiple perspectives 4.

    Read More

  • Russia in the 1930s

    1648 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first five-year plan, approved in 1929, proposed that state and collective farms provide 15 percent of agriculture output. The predominance of private farming seemed assured, as many farmers resisted collectivization. By late 1929, Stalin moved abruptly to break peasant resistance and secure the resources required for industrialization. He saw that voluntary collectivism had failed, and many “Soviet economists doubted that the first plan could even be implimented.”1 Stalin may have viewed collectivization as a means to win support from younger party leaders, rather than from the peasants and Lenin’s men. “Privately he advocated, industrializing the country with the help of internal accumulation” 2 Once the peasantry had been split, Stalin believed that the rural proletarians would embrace collectivization . Before this idea had a chance to work, a grain shortage induced the Politburo to support Stalin’s sudden decision for immediate, massive collectivization.

    Read More

  • Peasants Dbq

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the emancipation of the Russian Peasantry, land was given to the peasants. This was between 1861 and 1866, but because the nobility had lost their land when the peasants were given land, the peasants had to pay a tax until 1905. As the years passed, the land allotted to each person decreased from 13.8 acres to 7.3 acres as the population increased. Due to this increase in population and decrease in land, a series of famines struck the rural areas. As the peasants mainly occupied the rural areas, they were perceived to be living in poor conditions by the Russian people, and as response to their conditions, peasants started taking a stand, and voicing their opinions; change was proposed in the end when peasants were given more freedom,

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Crane Brinton's The Anatomy Of Revolution

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Bolshevik Revolution

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many people who have lived through and within the Bolshevik Revolution, so there are a multitudinous variety of perspectives, thoughts, and insights about the revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution is known for many things; some say that the revolution helped women become free of control, and others proclaim that it did nothing but continue to hold women captive of their desired rights. The Bolshevik Revolution article states the side of a history professor Richard Stites, who argues yes the revolution benefited the women whilst the other side is declared no the revolution did no justice for women at all, which was argued by a Russian scholar, Lesly A. Rimmel. The opposing arguments both create an effective view on the revolution, and

    Read More

  • Essay On The Causes Of Russian Revolution

    1114 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Russian revolution of February 1917 was a momentous event in the course of Russian history. The causes of the revolution were very critical and even today historians debate on what was the primary cause of the revolution. The revolution began in Petrograd as “a workers’ revolt” in response to bread shortages. It removed Russia from the war and brought about the transformation of the Russian Empire into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, replacing Russia’s monarchy with the world’s first Communist state. The revolution opened the door for Russia to fully enter the industrial age. Before 1917, Russia was a mostly agrarian nation. The Russian working class had been for many years fed up with the ways they had to live and work and it was only a matter of time before they had to take a stand. Peasants worked many hours for low wages and no land, which caused many families to lose their lives. Some would argue that World War I led to the intense downfall of Russia, while others believe that the main cause was the peasant unrest because of harsh living conditions. Although World War I cost Russia many resources and much land, the primary cause of the Russian Revolution was the peasant unrest due to living conditions because even before the war began in Russia there were outbreaks from peasants due to the lack of food and land that were only going to get worse with time.

    Read More

  • Arguing that Stolypin was Successful in His Plan to Modernize Russian Agriculture

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    Arguing that Stolypin was Successful in His Plan to Modernize Russian Agriculture During the time of Nicholas the second, the government was losing all control, the smell of revolution was in the air, the Tsar was under immense pressure not only from the citizens but from the army. In 1906 Pyotr (Peter) Stolypin was given power, as the new Prime Minister of Russia. He realized that reform was essential if autocracy was to survive.

    Read More

  • Rule of Lenin vs the Tsar

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rule of Lenin vs the Tsar The beginning of the 20th century saw a great change in the political structure of the Russia. A country once led under an autocracy leadership. was suddenly changed into a communist state overnight. Dictatorship and communism are at separate ends of the political spectrum. This study so clearly shows both involve the oppression of society and a strict regime in which people are unable to voice their opinions.

    Read More

  • The Iranian Revolution and the Russian Revolution

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590

    Read More

  • The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia Both forms of government did depend on high degree of central control. However, some Tsars and Stalin exerted more central controls than others. Stalin’s stronger use of central control created differences between the two forms of government. The Tsars used different levels of central control.

    Read More

  • Marxism and Leninism

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.

    Read More

  • 1917 Russian Revolution Essay

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords, while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite.

    Read More

More about The Extent to Which Sources Agree that Russian Government Policy on Agriculture Constantly Fails and Peasants Resisted it Under the Tsarist

Open Document