The Extent to Which Psychological Theories Have Been Successful in Explaining Attachments

670 Words2 Pages

The Extent to Which Psychological Theories Have Been Successful in Explaining Attachments There are various psychological theories to regard as which have been successful in explaining attachments and I will be explaining the majority of them. Sigmund Freud developed a theory of personality - an explanation of how each individual's personality develops. This theory can be used to explain many aspects of behaviour, including attachment. Feud proposed that attachment grows out of the feeding relationship. In essence Freud claimed that infants are born with an innate drive to seek pleasure. He called this the pleasure principle, and suggested that one 'structure of the personality' (id) was motivated by this principle. The id is the primitive, instinctive part of our personality that demands immediate satisfaction. In infancy the id demands oral satisfaction. The person providing this satisfaction becomes the love object, and an object is formed. This is another 'cupboard love' theory and can be dismissed with the same evidence as for behaviourist theory. This approach has been called the 'cupboard love' theory of attachment because it suggest that the infant becomes attached because he/she is fed, and that the infant becomes attached to the person who feeds him/her. Both Psychoanalytic and behaviourist theories are agreed on this primary source of attachments. Behaviourist approach: An infant learns that certain individuals are associated with the feelings of pleasure and reduce feelings of discomfort. The infant becomes attached to these individuals. Psychoanalytic approach: Attachment is adaptive and innate. Infants ... ... middle of paper ... ...o wanders away from its parent would have to find its own food and is likely to be eaten rather quickly Since imprinting is innate there is likely to be a limited window of development- a critical period. If the infant has not been exposed to a suitable object during this critical period, no imprinting will take place. Bowlby applied the concept of a sensitive period to attachment. He claimed that infants who did not form attachments by a certain age would find it difficult to become attached later. Although there are a wide range of theories which explain attachment, it is believable to accept many of them. For example, the behavourists approach which states that an infant becomes attached to an individual when that infant realises the certain individual is associated with feelings of pleasure like food.

More about The Extent to Which Psychological Theories Have Been Successful in Explaining Attachments

Open Document