Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should human reproductive and therapeutic cloning be illegal
Human cloning and is it ethical
Human cloning and is it ethical
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For many years, cloning has been a controversy. There has been many deliberations on weither cloning is ethically or morally right or wrong. The definition of cloning can differ from one situation to another, in general when speaking about a cloneit means a fragment of DNA which is a serie of manipulations from a particular piece that can be generated unlimitedly ( Cullis, "Entering The Clone Zone." ) In this essay, the readers will understand why cloning should be considered legal due to it's benefits among human beings and society.
The Human Cloning Foundation have contended human cloning, their reshearch involves the importance if medical benefits for a new treatment for infertility, providing tissues and organs for transplantations, as well as for example finding a cure to combat cancer. Many people would support the Foundation's arguments as being ethical and beneficial to have human cloning (Yount, 153) In general ckoning would also be used in cases such as to treat heart attacks, for plastic reconstructive and cosmectic surgery without putting in unknown products in the human body, for defective genes, to help women at risk to bear a child with a downsyndrome, to cure Tay-Sach disease, liver and kidney failure, leukemia, cystic fybrosis, spinal cord injuries and testing to cure genetic diseases. The list above is just a portion of what cloning could possinly do for mankind with the advanced technology now a days and it is still continuing to evolve it will eventually allow people to help certain suffering. (Yount,155) Many would argue that it depends on the situation, not everyone could benefit from this new technology, there should be a way to have this under control so no one takes advantage of it and ...
... middle of paper ...
...one would help treat a lot of diseases and abnomalities. Cloning benefits our society because it would help us get rid of the pain and suffering sometimes that we can hardly endure.
Works Cited
Birch, Charles, and Paul Abrecht, ed. Genetics and the quality of life. Australia: Pergamon Press, 2011. Print.
Cullis, Christopher A. "Entering The Clone zone." World & I 12.10 (1997): 145. Academic Search Premium. Web. 2 Nov. 2013.
Dudley, William, ed. The Ethics of human cloning. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, Inc, 2001. Print.
The Human Cloning Foundation. The Benefits of Human Cloning. N.p., 1998. Web. .
Mendel, Agata. Les Manipulations Génétiques. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1980. Print.
Takahashi, Seiya. "Until the cowscome cloned." Look Japan Jan. 1999: n. pag. Print.
Yount, Lisa, ed. Cloning. San Diego, Ca: Greenhaven Press, Inc, 2000. Print.
Children grow up watching movies such as Star Wars as well as Gattaca that contain the idea of cloning which usually depicts that society is on the brink of war or something awful is in the midsts but, with todays technology the sci-fi nature of cloning is actually possible. The science of cloning obligates the scientific community to boil the subject down into the basic category of morality pertaining towards cloning both humans as well as animals. While therapeutic cloning does have its moral disagreements towards the use of using the stem cells of humans to medically benefit those with “incomplete” sets of DNA, the benefits of therapeutic cloning outweigh the disagreements indubitably due to the fact that it extends the quality of life for humans.
Brown, Alistair. "Therapeutic Cloning: The Ethical Road To Regulation Part I: Arguments For And Against & Regulations." Human Reproduction & Genetic Ethics 15.2 (2009): 75-86. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
McGee, Glenn, (2001). Primer on Ethics and Human Cloning. ActionBioscience.org. Retrieved October 3, 2004, from: http://www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/mcgee.html
In arguing against cloning, the central debate is derived from the fact that this unnatural process is simply unethical. The alleged
In the past, cloning always seemed like a faraway scientific fantasy that could never really happen, but sometimes reality catches up to human ingenuity and people discover that a fictional science is all too real. Such was the fate of cloning when Dolly, a cloned sheep, came into existence during 1997, as Beth Baker explains (Baker 45). In addition to opening the eyes of millions of people, the breakthrough raised many questions about the morality of cloning humans. The greatest moral question is, when considering the pros against the cons, if human cloning is an ethical practice. There are two different types of cloning and both entail completely different processes and both are completely justifiable at the end of the day.
Cloning is, and always has been an extremely contentious topic. To some, the ethical complications surrounding it, are far more promiscuous than what scientists and medical experts currently acknowledge. Cloning is a general term that refers to the process in which an organism, or discrete cells and genes, undergo genetic duplication, in order to produce an identical copy of the original biological matter. There are two main types of artificial cloning; reproductive and therapeutic, both of which present their respective benefits and constraints. This essay aims to discuss the various differences between the two processes, as well as the ethical issues associated with it.
Brannigan, C. Michael. Ethical Issues in Human Cloning. New York: Seven Bridges Press, Chatham House Publishers, 2001.
8. Pellegrino, Edmund D., “Human Cloning and Human Dignity.” The President’s Council on Bioethics. 22 July 2007
Not so far in the future, a young boy of the age of six, dying a heart-wrenching death, will only be able survive with a bone marrow transplant. His parents will have searched near and far for a match, but none will come to their aid. The only possible way that they can produce a perfect match for their son's bone marrow is to clone their son. Unfortunately, at this time this topic is still being discussed and debated upon with the government. Their only child that has been their treasure for six years might die. A clone of their son becomes their apple of aspiration to keep the treasure from being buried.
Cloning, especially human cloning attracts increasingly more attention after the first mammal cloning animal Dolly born in 1997. Cloning is divided into two categories: therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. Therapeutic cloning is more related to tissue level cloning to transplant healthy cells and reproductive cloning is individual level cloning. Thus, the term cloning in this essay is used to describe both individual level and tissue level cloning. Public have different views. Some people support it because of its medical value, yet some people argue that it may bring many safety risks and moral problems. Hence, decisions ought to be made to identify the extent of cloning. Therefore, this essay introduces two major benefits of human cloning on disease therapy and analysis two arguments against it on safety and ethical issues.
Last of all, Cloning is not ethical, many religious groups look down upon cloning and think it’s not proper because they think it’s like playing God. Many scientists were mainly thinking about cloning animals and, most likely, humans in the future to harvest their organs and then kill them. “Who would actually like to be harvested and killed for their organs?” “Human cloning exploits human beings for our own self-gratification (Dodson, 2003).” A person paying enough money could get a corrupt scientist to clone anybody they wanted, like movie stars, music stars, athletes, etc (Andrea Castro 2005),” whether it be our desire for new medical treatments or our desire to have children on our own genetic terms (Dodson, 2003).
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of “Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?” John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.
"Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry." The President's Council on Bioethics Washington, D.C. N.p., July-Aug. 2002. Web.
Seidel, Jr., George E. "Cloning." World Book Student. World Book, 2014. Web. 13 Feb. 2014. source 19
Robinson, Bruce. “Human Cloning: Comments by political groups, religious authorities, and individuals.” 3 August 2001. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 1 October 2001 <http://www.religioustolerance.org/clo_reac.htm>.