The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

2243 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Difference between human beings and animals

In discussions of animal rights, one controversial issue has been animal experimentation. On the one hand, advocates argue that all animals have the right to not be exploited for experimentation. On the other hand, skeptics contend that animal experimentation is necessary in order to improve human health. I strongly believe that animal experimentation is unnecessary as it can be unreliable and cruel. Animals should not be forced to suffer for research. Alternatives for animal experimentation are on the rise and eventually these experimentations will come to an end for the better. Animal experimentation is believed to be required to accommodate from the research in order to enhance in the medical field for humans. Unfortunately, the truth …show more content…

Animals should not be forced to suffer for experimentation purposes. Come to think of it, it is more of a form of torture since the animal is forced without given a choice. The main reason being because, it is believed that animals have no rights in the first place. Therefore, animals are forced to injuries, diseases, and in some cases euthanasia at the end of the experimentation. Undoubtedly the animals are treated as simple disposable objects. Yearly around the world a great amount of animals ultimately die in research labs. Some countries have setup laws that defend animals from torment, and suffering in laboratories. The US Department of Agriculture, (USDA) has installed, the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) to combat poor care for animals being used for experimentation. The AWA requires that animals being used in research laboratories muse be take care of properly by an authorized veterinarian in a suitable environment, and provide the basic needs for the animals such as feeding, housing, watering etc. However this same law can also determine what animals are applicable for it. Even though, the AWA is designed to protect the animals, it does not protect all of them in the process. Some animals are rejected from the protection the AWA provides based on the animals group type, animals such as mice, reptiles, birds and amphibians are the unfortunate ones. Laboratories that …show more content…

Yes such methods exist and work properly. For example, Vitro testing is cells are examined in a petri dish since human cells are available for use, it provides more accurate results than animal experimentation in all. Skeptics will object this claim since they strongly believe that animals and humans are parallel from one another, but they clearly dismiss the fact that animals and humans are so different from one another physically and biologically. We cannot forget about the vast varieties of species that exist in the animal kingdom making it only more complicated to gain from the results in all. Skeptics insist that both we and animals benefit from the experimentation in the end, yet it may mislead researchers into ignoring potential treatments and cures. Chemicals that may be hazardous to animals may be beneficial to a human, who knows how many hopeful medications are denied since they don’t work on animals and have not been tested on humans. Animals in research labs are meant to be properly taken care of under the AWA to prevent mistreatment. Still this same law has a major loophole since it does not cover all the animals such as rats, bird’s fish, reptiles and other small rodents which are the major animals used for experimentation in labs. The AWA clearly lacks proper regulation among animal testing. Often religious

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiment

    755 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the turn of the new century, activists begun to protest the morality of animal experimentation: “… such methodology is far too cruel on beast, it cannot better mankind, but its lead to it demise…” Despite the rising concern for animal safety in laboratory research, federal legislations approved the practice. According to the federal bureaucrats, it is an essential tool to improve our current medical knowledge. Hence, most of the tested animals have a relatively shorter life span than human. Thus, it allows to test long-term disease in a smaller timeframe. Nonetheless, animal enthusiast request the banishment of animal experimentation in laboratory. Ergo, with our current technology, researchers are capable to reproduce the same result

    Read More

  • The Pros of Animal Testing

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “…13,000 to 20,000 para-lytic cases were reported annually,” before the 18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, “…a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were reported, compared with 61 in 1965.” This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease can only be attributed to the success of animal testing. Animal experimentation is used in the research of genetics, drug testing, biology, toxicity testing, cosmetic testing, and many other fields. Despite all of its beneficial traits, animal testing has been wildly controversial over the past decades because of its perceived unethical treatment towards animals. Although animal testing may be deemed unethical by many, it is a form of medical testing that has not only saved lives but has also greatly revolutionized the medical world.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Nonhuman Animal Experimentation

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    (Intro)Nonhuman Animal Experimentation is defined as the use of nonhuman animals in research and development projected for the sole purpose of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. According to The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), scientific experiments have required animals to “inhale toxic fumes,... remain immobilized in restraint devices for hours,... suffer through the drilling of holes into their skulls,... withstand the burning of their skin,... and endure the agony caused from the crushing of their spinal cord”(“Animal experiments: overview,” n.d.). Testing harmful products on animals everyday creates a long lasting effect on the animals. That is to say, numbers of animals have been diagnosed with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and have become so afraid of humans that they crawl into a corner everytime they see a person.

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    Writing this paper did not affect my original line of thinking in regards to the topic. I support animal rights in every way, and am extremely against any sort of testing. Observing the “necessities” of animal testing did not, in any way, alter my negative view of animal experimentation.

    Read More

  • animal experimentation: pros and cons

    1548 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal experimentation is not as good as it may seem to humans because we are not feeling it. It is cruel to animals to experience this. Many experts say is the only way to make new medicine, but you have to think about the animal. Many people don't even know what happens during experimentation on animals.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay #3

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal Experimentation. Ed. Susan C. Hunnicutt. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. At Issue. Rpt. from "Animal Welfare and Animal Rights." 2011. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 16 May 2014.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of

    Read More

  • Pros of Animal Experimentation

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.

    Read More

  • The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing is a controversial topic, with two main sides of the argument. The side opposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organisms have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    For many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.

    Read More

  • Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?

    2169 Words  | 5 Pages

    Peter Singer, an author and philosophy professor, “argues that because animals have nervous systems and can suffer just as much as humans can, it is wrong for humans to use animals for research, food, or clothing” (Singer 17). Do animals have any rights? Is animal experimentation ethical? These are questions many struggle with day in and day out in the ongoing battle surrounding the controversial topic of animal research and testing, known as vivisection. Throughout centuries, medical research has been conducted on animals.

    Read More

  • The Cons of Animal Testing

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.

    Read More

  • Pros Of Animal Testing

    434 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    Conducting medical experiments on animals is a savage act and needs to be banned. It is cruel to the animals involved, it’s not always accurate, and with today’s technology we can create a better alternative. This act should be prohibited and substituted with synthetic subjects.

    Read More

  • Should Animals be Used for Scientific Research?

    1711 Words  | 4 Pages

    Every year, millions of animals experience painful, suffering and death due to results of scientific research as the effects of drugs, medical procedures, food additives, cosmetics and other chemical products. Basically, animal experimentation has played a dominant role in leading with new findings and human advantages. Animal research has had a main function in many scientific and medical advances in the past decade and is helping in the understanding of several diseases. While most people believe than animal testing is necessary, others are worried about the excessive suffering of this innocent’s creatures. The balance between the rights of animals and their use in medical research is a delicate issue with huge societal assumptions. Nowadays people are trying to understand and take in consideration these social implications based in animals rights. Even though, many people tend to disregard animals that have suffered permanent damage during experimentation time. Many people try to misunderstand the nature of life that animals just have, and are unable to consider the actual laboratory procedures and techniques that these creatures tend to be submitted. Animal experimentation must be excluded because it is an inhumane way of treat animals, it is unethical, and exist safer ways to test products without painful test.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Open Document