Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Implications of technology in education
Implications of technology in education
Role of technology in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Implications of technology in education
“BYOD [Bring Your Own Device]…potentially allows school districts to cut [there] IT budgets, possibly helping the movement make inroads there, but BYOD…represents a particularly dangerous trend for multiple reasons” (Geller, 2013).
The philosophy of BYOD is very intriguing to many people. In this paper, I will answer three important ethical questions regarding BYOD in the classroom. Keep in mind that BYOD in the classroom refers to grades twelve and below. College level students are expected to have these devices to conduct their schoolwork and their individual institutions and teachers govern those students respectively.
Does BYOD Create an Uneven Playing Field in the Classroom?
“The only way to guarantee equitable educational experiences is for each student to have access to the same materials and learning opportunities. BYOD leaves this to chance with more affluent students continuing to have an unfair advantage over their classmates. This is particularly problematic in a society with growing economic disparity” (Stager, 2014). The uneven playing field will accompany the introduction of BYOD into the classroom, if the school lets it. I agree that if BYOD is implemented alone, then those families who are more financially stable will be able to provide tools for their children to use, and benefit from that. While other, not so financially stable families cannot.
There are however an alternatives. One alternative example would be, if a school were to implement a BYOD for grade levels that will truly benefit from the additional learning tools then they should also be ready to purchase devices for students who cannot afford them. Those students, to avoid any daily humiliation, could then check out the device at the beg...
... middle of paper ...
...k Blog. [online] Doug-johnson.squarespace.com. Available at: [Accessed 20 Apr. 2014].
Panagos, T., 2014. The Future of Education: BYOD in the Classroom | Innovation Insights | WIRED. [online] WIRED. Available at: [Accessed 19 Apr. 2014].
Raicu, I., 2014. The Ethical Dilemma of BYOD. [online] Santa Clara University. Available at: [Accessed 19 Apr. 2014].
Sangani, K., 2013. BYOD TO THE CLASSROOM. Engineering & Technology, (3), pp.42-45.
Stager, G. (2014). BYOD – Worst Idea of the 21st Century? : Stager-to-Go. [online] Stager.tv. Available at: http://stager.tv/blog/?p=2397 [Accessed 27 Apr. 2014].
I was surprised to learn that students from both the U.S. and abroad agreed that American schools had more technology. I think of Japan and Hong Kong as being very technologically advanced and did not expect to have more than them. Ripley reports that “the United States invests more heavily in technology in classrooms than even high-performing countries.” This result opens an interesting debate of whether technology advances student learning. In my high school, we had a one-for-one policy, meaning each student in grades 9-12 received a district-owned laptop. The laptops did indeed increase student learning, but for reasons other than what the school board wants to think. The laptops provided every student with a means to complete their homework. There were no more excuses of “My printer broke!” or “My Wi-Fi connection was down!” Each student was expected to download the assignment while at school, where the Wi-Fi was guaranteed. Then, the work could be completed at home and turned in during the next class session. The laptops provided accountability for all the students, but did not ‘enhance classroom lessons’, as was the intention. The school board liked to believe that the technology would increase interactivity in classrooms and open new doors for learning, but that interactivity that was discussed in board meetings was nonexistent in practicality. In addition, they tended to waste time. We would spend the
In her article “In Defense of Laptops in the Classroom”, Rebecca Schuman, an education columnist for “Slate”, deals with the issue of having laptops in the classroom. Schuman believes that the rigid enforcement of the no-laptop rule infantilizes students and it is the students’ responsibility to be disciplined enough to not misuse the laptops in class, thus her views that laptops should be allowed in the classroom. Furthermore, they can be used to make learning more effective. While Schuman presents valid arguments for her stand, they are not persuasive for they lack concrete evidences and contain many assumptions.
The Web. 07 October 2011. Engel, George, and Tim Green. “Cell Phones in the Classroom: Are We Dialing Up? Distaster?” TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning.
In the study previously discussed which stated that students’ examination scores went up substantially when smartphones were banned from schools, Carr asserts that “the weakest students” (3) benefited the most from the ban. By stating how the weakest students benefited from smartphones being banned, Carr is able to sway the emotions of the reader in favor of his argument. Through his use of a study that took place in secondary school, Carr is able to take the reader back to a time when they themselves were in secondary school trying to pass their exams. With such an easy and simple solution to getting these students scores up by banning smartphones, it makes the reader side with the author in his belief that smartphones influence our thinking and some distance and separation from our phones is necessary. Carr also incorporates emotion to support his argument by discussing about how the mere presence of smartphones can mess up our social skills and relationships.
...ohnson, Ben. "How the IPad Can Transform Classroom Learning." Edutopia. N.p., 9 July 2012. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.
Over the past few years, technology has grown to be the driving force in human productivity and efficiency. Technology has been incorporated into our everyday lives to help us perform daily activities and bridge long distance communication. Although technology has brought us many advantages, it has also created quite few ethical issues along the way. Some of the biggest ethical issues technology has created revolve around cell phones. These issues include cell phone tracking and using the cell phone to cheat. Cell phone privacy can be compromised in many situations regarding phone call tracking and messaging. Cell phone use is also starting to be abused by students and other test takers to cheat on tests. Even if the person has good moral standards, sometimes the right decision to make is not always clear.
Cell phones have many instructional benefits in a student’s academic career. Author Carol L. Tilley stated correctly that cell phones “would support and allow for enhanced communications and collaboration”. Through new technology students can use many different applications during class that are interactive with their teachers lecture. For example a teacher may have a power point lecture and have questions...
Have you ever heard of the gruesome Columbine High School massacre? This incident occurred on April 20th 1999 and involved two students embarking on a shooting rampage, killing twelve students, a teacher and wounding twenty three others. Unfortunately during this incident, the school's most easily accessible phone was on the other side of the school in the library. Perhaps some of these lives could have been saved if the students in this class had cell phones that they could've used to contact the authorities more quickly. The issue we are addressing today is the use of cellular devices in educational facilities. I believe that cell phone use is of extreme convenience, and has academically beneficial aspects, among it's so called "faults".
Electronics are a huge part of our society. “Out of the world’s estimated 7 billion people, 6 billion have access to mobile phones” (Wang). Over thousands of these cell phones are owned by students K-12. A major debate topic is should cell phones be allowed in schools? “Twenty-four percent of schools have banned mobile devices altogether and sixty-two percent allow them on school grounds, but not in the classroom” (Raths).
With the blooming development of science and technology, mobile phones have become an indispensable part of life. The increasing number of teenagers who use a cell phone in schools which disrupts classrooms orders has become a major concern. However, mobile phones should not be banned in schools. Actually, it is not necessary to ban mobile phones in schools. Additionally, using mobile phones in schools has some positive influences. Furthermore, it is likewise a human right for students.
...; it should not be a tool to divide society. The opportunity to learn more effectively should be offered to all students regardless of economic situations. The ability to operate the technologies that locate and use information is a critical skill. If economics are a factor in keeping some students from learning these skills, society as a whole will suffer. All schools need to be equipped to teach in the most effective way; this means they need technology and teachers who know how to use it. Technology is expensive. Federal funds do not cover the expense and funds are always in danger of being cut. This leaves local schools and districts to take up the slack. People need to be aware of the expense and work together to generate funds. Alliances and partnerships with corporations and small businesses are one way to gain equipment. Costs can also be shared by local civic groups, school districts and individuals. If the people band together, they will have a better chance to compete for federal and private foundation money. Well organized grassroot groups influence action. The importance of technology in learning should never be disregarded, and it should be available to all students.
Ever since incidents such as 9/11 and Columbine, high schools have started implementing new rules regarding cellphones. Cellphones attract the attention of building managers, teachers, parents, and students. Although teachers see them as a distraction and a way to cheat, they can be quite helpful to students. School districts should permit students to use cellular devices in school for purposes of improving their education and providing themselves with a sense of security. By permitting the use of cellphones in school, students can increase their knowledge and complete school work by using applications and other features on their smartphones.
Technology and more specifically cellular phones play an important role in our everyday life. Today researchers have found that cellular’s help not only inside the classroom but have had a positive learning outcome outside as well (Thomas & OBannon, 2013). When we think of cell phone, learning is not the first thing that comes to mind, but with the different ways that as teacher cell phones can be use for everything. Granted most of these ideas are for more mature students, the ones that have a better understanding of not only technology but also how to use it for their education. Some say that cellular can be use as an incentive for students to learn and there are guides and books that teach educators how to handle the technology in the classroom without creating a problem. Even though some say educator are still the ones deciding if or when to use technology the truth is that every child has a Smartphone or a laptop or some technology available at that moment that not even if the teacher wanted them to stop using it they wouldn’t.
The first reason to support that mobile phones should be banned in schools is that devices can be used to cheating for instance, text friends about answers during a test, take picture of test questions with mobile phones to send to friends, search the internet to answers during a test, and store information on mobile phones to look at during a test. It is suggested by Benenson Strategy Group (2008) indicated that 65 per c...
Mobile phones are undeniable today. Almost everybody has a mobile phone. Formerly, it only functioned as a portable mean of communication. The function of a mobile phone has developed into entertainment. Furthermore, mobile phone has also come into the schools. However, it has both positive and negative effect on students. This essay argues that mobile phones will bring more negative than positive effect for students. Of course, students use it as a mean of communication and sometimes for an emergency call if they need it. Yet, they would use their mobile phones for both bullying and cheating. Also, mobile phones will make students lost concentration during their study.