Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on multitasking and its effects
Essays on multitasking and its effects
Christine Rosen summary on the myth of multitasking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on multitasking and its effects
Students are often challenged with multitasking in a classroom setting, such as taking notes, listening to a lecture, and interacting with their cell phones or laptops. As students are allocating their attention to multiple places at once, it is important that students still learn effectively. The purpose of this study is to understand how the recall of undergraduate students is being effected by this division of attention. Electronic devices, such as phones and laptops, are becoming an immense distraction in schools, and they appear to be negatively impacting learning (Carrier, Rosen, Cheever, & Lim, 2015). As students spend vast amounts of time listening to lectures and completing assigned readings, the use electronic devices increases
Literature shows that the networking generation is very involved in multitasking, but they are still showing no signs of improving. Students bring media multitasking into the classroom with them on a regular basis; this has negative implications on learning. Threaded cognition and cognitive load theory attempt to explain multitasking. Using these studies, past literature has been examining how multitasking impacts the human ability to retain information; thus negatively effecting learning. Our study was designed to examine the the effects of divided attention on long-term memory recall in undergraduate students. Our study will contribute to the implications of clarifying how divided attention (multitasking) has an impact on long-term memory recall and performance, and how it does this as multitasking challenges become more difficult. In this study, we expected that the best recall scores would be for words encoded in the control condition (single task), followed by words encoded in the easy dual-task condition, and finally by words encoded in the challenging dual-task condition.
The first limitation of our study is that the sample selected was a sample of convenience. As this was a relatively small university class at a small university, this may limit the generalizability of our results. Our methodology included only that of free recall, and recall can be effected by a number of items. If our test included other types of recall such cued recall or serial recall, our results may differ. Furthermore, some students may have a more difficult time focusing on the word lists or the math equations following the lists. If a student had a poor background in math, they may panic upon seeing the equations. Future researchers may want to test the effects of how other types of recall are effected by multitasking. Future research should also be based on a larger sample of undergraduate students, as they would improve the
Just spending some time in the modern-day classroom; I have observed several students on their phones. During my high school years we did not have to worry about cell phones or laptops being a constant problem. In Annie Murphy Paul’s “You’ll Never Learn!” she explains the studies of multitasking while students do their homework with the modern-day distraction of the digital age; resulting in a lower quality of learning. I agree with Paul that the digital age is becoming a problem in education, even though educators are leaning towards teaching on a digital spectrum. In this essay, I will explain how a digital age versus a non-digital age is effecting everyone involved in a higher education.
Some people multitask unconsciously in their life, but unconscious multitask does not mean an inappropriate action because situations might require them to do unconsciously. Videos, prints, radios, gaming formats allow people to multitask a lot (Purcell & Rainie, 2014). People in workplaces they have so many opportunities to multitask; for example, people might listen to radios from their computers while they print papers out. In our developed society, there are no days which we avoid multitasking. Americans were gaining 100,500 words per day in 2008 (Purcell & Rainie, 2014). Multitasking enables people to have the amount of the words, and they must have a lot of information. Although some people might think that technology prevents people from doing good performance. According to Carr (2010), the net makes people have constant distractions and interruptions. The user of internet can definitely have a lot of information and use helpful tools for learning. If we are able to have a lot of information by multitasking, we are able to have various kinds of knowledge. In a classroom, we might see some people who type on laptops while they listen to a teacher. As an experiment at Stanford University, 49 people who did often multitask performed less than 52 people who avoided multitasking (Carr, 2010, 50). In fact, the 49 people were supposed to multitask heavily, but we do not need to have multitasking heavily, and what we
Many would remark that multitasking is a skill that can be trained like all others. However, a lot of neuroscience has went into proving that multitasking is a myth altogether. The article “The Myth of Multitasking” is written by Nancy K. Napier for Psychology today is here to debunk the myth of the brain’s capability to multitask. The article states that the brain is incapable of doing two things at once. Instead, the way that we fool ourselves into thinking that we can multitask is how quickly our brain switches from one task to another. Our brains can’t perform tasks simultaneously as our focus is a narrow beam. So, to compensate for this, our brain switches between these two tasks very quickly, almost as if we are doing them at the same
Samuel corrects this outcome in her article by explaining, “Whether it’s an overflowing inbox, a backlog of unread articles or a Twitter feed that moves faster than we can read, most of us are suffering from an information overload.” By having multiple programs open at once, such as a web browser, word processor, and email application, people are overloading themselves with too much information, and are therefore less efficient. Richtel explains how multitasking has been scientifically proven to be less efficient by stating, “While many people say multitasking makes them more productive, research shows otherwise. Heavy multitaskers actually have more trouble focusing and shutting down irrelevant information, scientists say, and they cause more stress.” By only selecting one task at a time to complete, one can stop the information overload causing the loss of focus and the ability to let go of useless figures and programs. However, a loss of focus is not only the consequence of multitasking. A disorder, or as Sam Horn describes it, “. . . a distinctive type of brain organization,” called ADHD causes odd behaviors such as restlessness in children and impatience in adults (Restak 413-414). Restak describes ADHD’s involvement in the workplace by stating, “In order to be successful in today’s workplace you have to incorporate some elements of ADD/ADHD” (416). Multitasking has made the behaviors stated above normal in the workplace, but the symptoms from ADHD or ADD can be limited by reserving a person’s attention to one matter at a time. Though working on only one task at a time may seem less efficient at first, having to switch between programs could cause a loss of focus due to the many distractions such programs could bring
In conclusion, multitasking has effects on the users’ abilities to retain their concentration, and also short-term memory overcomes long-term memory due to using the Net. Carr’s thesis is interesting and I agree with him. It is important to remember that excessive use of the Internet might cause permanent changes to the way our brains act; therefore, we, as users, have to pay more attention to the new digital age of media
Today we live in a society where everything is seconds away from us. With the advances and affordability of quality technology, you would be hard pressed to find someone without a smartphone, laptop, or tablet, possibly all at the same time. Because of the accessibility we find that, in our tech-savvy culture, multitasking has not just become an art form of sorts, but rather an expectation. In the article “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend sets out to explore the idea that although multitasking appears to show productivity, it could be doing the opposite. Throughout her article, Tugend uses studies done by neurologists and psychologists to show how in a world that sees multitasking as an expectation it has actually made us less efficient. She proposes, through studies, that although you might be working on multiple tasks it is as if you’re playing tennis with multiple balls (Tugend, 725).
As was previously stated, The Handwriting Debate reveals that handwriting helps students retain memory more effectively than keyboarding. One study by Virginia Berninger, a professor of educational psychology at the University of Washington, compared students who took notes by hand versus classmates who took n...
...lis believes multitasking can save time because the brain splits in half to work on two different tasks at once. The survey takers who say they multitask on a daily basis even having differing opinions on multitasking. Hayles believes we should change the teaching methods on the basis that most students need to multitask to maintain concentration, however, there are conflicting studies as to whether multitasking is helpful or a burden. With this in mind, it is hard to take any action regarding multitasking until there is more evidence that leans in one direction than the other as to whether or not multitasking can benefit us. Thus, more studies need to occur involving real life situations to determine whether or not multitasking is beneficial, and there also needs to be a more solid definition of what multitasking is in order to determine if it is beneficial or not.
It is common to notice that the internet has rewired our brain into multitasking much more than before. However, it was concluded after numerous studies that this kind of digital multitasking does not make us smarter or more swift in our activities, but quite on the contrary negatively impacts our academic performance. A more scientific aspect of why our brain is affected by the large sea of information that is available to us is touched upon by Eric Jaffe. The writer explains that “the barrage of new media distractions is placing new demands on cognitive processing, and especially on attention allocation […] While cause-and-effect is difficult to parse here, in some sense it doesn’t matter. If all this digital media is causing people to multi-task
This article discusses the distractions and effects of mutli-tasking and using our electronic devices constantly. "Multitasking is never a good idea if you really need to get something done" (p. 26). When we get a text message or look at our phones an addictive chemical called dopamine is released into our brains. Laptops, mobile devices, and interruptions hinder our learning and focus. Although technology can be very helpful, it has caused many negative situations such as car accidents, poor grades, and bullying.
According to The Dangers of Multitasking, the downsides of multitasking outweigh its upsides (Davies 39). Multitasking students can miss many necessary information that they really need to pass tests and understand lessons when they multitask during the lectures, which causes them to get a low grade on their tests. “Many experienced multitaskers have experienced an unexpected thing when, for example, their e-mail service was disabled for a period of time. They discovered that they were actually more productive during that period of time” (Multitasking 758). That means that multitaskers are more productive when they concentrate on one task; so students will do better on tests and in school in general, if they quit or cut back on multitasking during classes. Moreover, “The human brain works more efficiently on a single task and for sustained rather than intermitted or alternating periods of time” (Multitasking 758). So, this does not mean...
Multitasking may seem convenient but deceptively costly. Multitasking has been scientifically proven to damage your brain and everyday function. Multitasking is digging people in a hole that they are not aware of. Although, many people believe they are multitasking when they are truly not. People need to quit multitasking because the brain is trained to focus on one thing at a time. It’s impossible to put your full effort into something if you are multitasking.
For example, students became more distracted as they now have the ability to easily surf the web while teachers are trying to teach them new concepts and engage them in their learning. In the article “ The Four Negative Sides of Technology,”Pamela Deloatch, states that “95% of teens 12-17 spending time online .the time spent with technology doesn’t just give kids a new fangled way of doing things.It changes the way their brain works. This means children are spending too much time on their devices that it is difficult to control them. During school hours teacher has a trouble keeping students interested in a topic. Also, students are cheating on tests and homework assignments have moved up in the past years, as most tests and quizzes are taken online it is easier for student to rapidly search for an answer from the internet in order to obtain better grades. Many claim that students become better multi taskers, but in reality this is false. Pamela Deloatch asserts “while videos may condition them [students] to pay attention to multiple stimuli. They can lead to a distraction and a decrease in memory storage.” Teachers agree that the devices have definitely changed students’ perspectives on learning.Many believe that technological devices have decreased their critical thinking skills and how they analysis reading text. In another article, Matt Mitchel local teacher stated, “ I’ am an entertainer., said Hope Molina- Porter, an English teacher at Troy High School in Fullerton, Calif., who has taught for 14 years. She teaches accelerated students, but has noted a marked decline in the depth and analysis of their written work.” Hope says that capturing her students ' attention has grown into a major problem because they are
Multitasking with non-course material results in a student’s attention being diverted from the course material that is being taught. This can result in errors in memory for the student and also a more difficult time learning the information outside of the classroom (Kraushaar & Novak, 2010, p.1). The University of Vermont completed a study in order to determine the impacts of multitasking with a laptop during a university lecture. Through the experiment they were able to determine that “students with a high [and long] frequency of software multitasking during lectures will exhibit lower academic performance than students with a low [and short] frequency of software multitasking” (Kraushaar & Novak, 2010, p.6). This shows that repeated and lengthy multitasking with technology in particular laptops during lecture times can cause extremely negative results in a students academic performances and
In today’s society, technology use has increased rapidly, and the need for multitasking correlates with that. Multitasking is the ability to perform well at two or more jobs at the same time (Van der Horst et al. 434). Technology is ever growing, and the ability to multitask has become more apparent. The need to understand multitasking has only recently become a topic of importance (Van der Horst et al. 434). Van der Horst mentions that with the quantity of technologies people have access to like email, instant messaging, and smart phones, people deal with multiple sources of information at once all the time (Van der Horst et al. 434). On average, people spend three minutes on a task and when technology is involved, only two