Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
ethical issues in organ donation
arguments against cloning
arguments against cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: ethical issues in organ donation
Many science fiction movies include futuristic beings known as clones, but is this the age of the future and are clones becoming a reality? In movies, clones are represented as mindless forms that obey every command of their master or creator; however, in reality, clone prototypes today will be late-term twins of the cells of whom were taken. The technology of cloning has taken over 50 years to perfect, and is still nowhere near perfection. Once the technology of cloning is misdirected, the technology has the potential to develop terrifying effects.
The idea of cloning began in 1952 when the first nuclear transfer occurred from an early frog embryo into an enucleated frog egg. This experiment by Robert Briggs and Thomas King marked the first
…show more content…
In Frankenstein, Victor is very intelligent and responsible leading up to the birth of his creation and obtains all the information he can absorb into his mind, yet he finds himself struggling to take care of this monster. Victor puts everything he has into his creation because he must obtain his vision, “I had worked hard for nearly 2 years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body. For this I had deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation” (Shelley). Victor’s desire to obtain the role of God parallels the scientists working in labs throughout the world, trying to obtain the unimaginable, creating life from a single human cell. The outcome of Victor’s work and efforts of the cloning scientists share similarities as both creations will never be perfect. In every experiment of cloning, many mistakes have occurred. Before the first mammal was ever cloned it took 277 attempts before Wilmut and Campbell finally succeeded, and the animal was still not perfect and lived to only half its expected lifespan. Frankenstein’s creation took over 2 years of experimentation and preparation and many years of studying before that, yet his masterpiece became a monster and was terrifyingly ugly. Another device that is vital to both cloning and Frankenstein, is the great amount of personal responsibility they both have to hold. In …show more content…
In order to treat clones as the equal humans they should be, medical doctors must not harvest vital organs that will kill them in order to save “real” people’s lives. Science must proceed on the ethical side of the spectrum, and continue with the ban on human cloning, although there can be many great healing
When the novel “Frankenstein”, by Mary Shelley came out in 1831 the general public was introduced to the idea of man creating another man scientifically; without the use of reproduction. This idea is still very interesting today, however many ethical problems are implicated when scientists, like Victor Frankenstein, disrupt the moral and ethical standards like many modern day scientists have done today with cloning. The astronomical effects that followed after the creation of The Monster, demonstrates the horrid fact that creating a human was not natural or ethical.
In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley forewarns her audience about the consequences we face if we do not take responsibility for our actions through Victor Frankenstein’s actions. In the beginning of the novel, Victor desires fame from discovering new knowledge of the world, which leads him to create the creature whom he neglects. The neglect from its creator leads the creature to resent the Frankenstein family and ultimately murdering them. Due to his lack of responsibility as the creator of the creature, Victor is punished by having to watch his loved ones die off one by one. Reflecting on the consequences of Victor’s irresponsibility, human cloning brings concern because of the ethicality of the act.
...cloning can be divided into two broad category: potential safety risk and moral problems, and these concerns overweigh its achievement.
Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, started out as an intelligent young man that increasingly grew into an even more curious young man. His interest in the human body and creating life became almost became an obsession for him. He was determined to do what he needed to do in order to create the most incredible clone of a human. Victor went to great lengths to complete this occupation of his that took up nearly all of his time, including many nights of visiting the graveyards studying the human corpses. Getting the body parts was the easy part of this upcoming creation, it was going to be all the sleepless days and nights trying to create the veins, blood vessels, etc., that would be the challenging part of this whole ordeal.
In every aspect of our lives we have a choice that can determine our dishonorable effort
In the nineteenth century, the idea of creating life was thought to be science fiction. A nineteenth century writing, Mary Shelly's novel Frankenstein, portrays Victor (the creator) as innocent and the creation as evil at the beginning of the novel. Later, it becomes evident that the monster was not evil when created, rather that the creature was made evil by the surrounding environment. Victor's immediate response was, as Shelly writes, "Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath" (??). The monster soon understood that he was in fact hideous. Shelly writes, "Knowing social opinion, the monster explained after his agonizing shock of self-discovery, 'All men hate the wretched'" (??). Whereas the cloning of humans may not produce a being like Victor's creation, there is little doubt that society may react harshly to this new type of being. The expectations would be enlarged for the creation, which may lead to negative consequences for both the creation and society.
Cloning is, and always has been an extremely contentious topic. To some, the ethical complications surrounding it, are far more promiscuous than what scientists and medical experts currently acknowledge. Cloning is a general term that refers to the process in which an organism, or discrete cells and genes, undergo genetic duplication, in order to produce an identical copy of the original biological matter. There are two main types of artificial cloning; reproductive and therapeutic, both of which present their respective benefits and constraints. This essay aims to discuss the various differences between the two processes, as well as the ethical issues associated with it.
Cloning has been a controversial topic since the time it was introduced, prompting questions of ethics. Although it has been unintentionally in use for thousands of years, it was first brought about in the 1960’s. As more and more discoveries have been gained since then, numerous uncertainties continue to be raised among scientists, politicians, and anyone interested in the issue. While the idea of cloning is intriguing and polarizing, there is a fine like that defines what is and isn’t ethical; it is moral to clone cells for research development and plants for agricultural desires, but it is in no way acceptable to clone humans and animals for reproductive reasons.
Victor Frankenstein created a creature that he abandoned after contemplating his faults and deemed them unacceptable. He renounced his creation and totally rejects it because of its size and looks that frightened everyone as they greeted Victor’s creature with fear and violent reactions. Shelly’s Frankenstein revolved on issues of Victor’s science and ambition, moral responsibility, psychological balance and social isolation that must very well remind each one of us that humans are God’s images, and humans as scientists in continuing to probe into the power of creation and attempt to understand it must perform as stewards of God’s creation. The attempt to create a new creature with extreme powers sums up how humans can be so conceited in recognizing human abilities and the ...
8. Pellegrino, Edmund D., “Human Cloning and Human Dignity.” The President’s Council on Bioethics. 22 July 2007
Verhey, Allen. "Cloning Would Violate a Person's Individuality." Biomedical Ethics Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Tamara L. Roleff. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1998. 40-44. Print.
There are many opinions on the topic of cloning, particularly on the controversy of human cloning. Lots of people have many fears over if we should continue this form of study, whereas others think that this technology should be pushed forward with high hopes. However, no side should rule out the other, but instead, should compliment one another. Both arguments should be heard and acknowledged before any decision is made towards this new area of study. For example, many people think that their fears are unanswerable and should cause the absolute ban on cloning.
“I discovered the secret of life… and I control it: said Victor Frankenstein. Clerval responds “You are not god and you cannot create like god”. The creator’s ambition to be all powerful and god-like brings him to generate a creature that later he would regret making. The scientist allows his zeal to take control of his. He believes he is omnipotent. A morally irresponsible scientific development can release a monster that can destroy human civilization itself. The film Frankenstein from the author David Wicks indicates that playing with creation has dreadful consequences.
Imagine a world in which a clone is created only for its organs to be transplanted into a sick person’s body. Human cloning has many possible benefits, but it comes with concerns. Over the past few decades, researchers have made several significant discoveries involving the cloning of human cells (ProQuest Staff). These discoveries have led to beneficial medical technologies to help treat disease (Aldridge). The idea of cloning an entire human body could possibly revolutionize the medical world (Aldridge). However, many people are concerned that these advancements would degrade self-worth and dignity (Hyde and Setaro 89). Even though human cloning brings about questions of bioethics, it has the potential to save and recreate the lives of humans and to cure various diseases without the use of medication (Aldridge, Hyde and Setaro).
The pop culture version of the novel Frankenstein depicts Victor Frankenstein’s need for science and creation, a need that results in him creating a monster. An ingenious and inventive scientist, Victor mastered everything he learned from his professors. Unfortunately, he ultimately created something he regrets and pays for until the day he dies. Victor Frankenstein takes his interest in science and creation to an unhealthy and extreme level, and plays God. In playing this God figure over his creation, he creates this being with no intentions of giving it love or happiness. He is selfish and creates it for himself, and he brings the unliving to life out of old used parts.