Violence is everywhere in the United States of America. Many people in America and around the world have been a victim or know someone who has been a victim of violence. Over 22 million women in the United States have been raped in their lifetime according to the website, Victims of Crime. This number is significant. Advertisements could play a role in making violence more acceptable in our society. PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is known for having shocking advertisements. This pro-vegan and pro-vegetarian nonprofit organization has always been a topic of interest. Many of PETA’s ad campaigns are related to sexuality, violence, discrimination against how people look, and dominance over women. There are many pro-vegetarian and pro-vegan ads that do not degrade women and still are persuasive. Jean Kilbourne writes about violence and the degradation of women in advertisements. Kilbourne explains her point of view in her piece, ‘“Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt’: Advertising and Violence.” Considering Kilbourne’s argument, PETA ads are a concern because of the suggested violence while other pro-vegan and vegetarian ads are not.
While watching television one day I saw a commercial for the ASPCA about giving donations to help this organization stop animal cruelty and rescue abused animals. After seeing this I started wondering how many people just watched the same commercial and didn’t pay attention because it was just a commercial. However it wasn’t just a commercial it was a plead, a wish, and a warning to anyone who wants to stop the abuse of animals. Animal cruelty is a major concern in the world today with so many animals being abused however there are ways in which to prevent this and the public needs to be more aware of the types, the signs, and what they can do to stop animal cruelty as well as the organizations that help make this possible like the ASPCA.
Every company that has a product to sell wants to have their advertisements grab the attention of the potential buyer. Companies today are competing at high levels to come up with the advertisements that will be flashy and aggressive so consumers will become interested in their product. However, a commercial or an ad might not get the initial point across or cause many viewers to be confused when they see them. Sometimes, what the company is trying to do might offend people. Ethical lines may be walked upon so that the strong points can be presented to the consumer.
Provocative imagery, shock factors, guilt trips and what they’re infamously known for, sexist shaming; this is PETA’s arsenal of tools to manipulate and mould people to follow their arguably twisted ideology. PETA uses women and presents them as stereotypical and unattainable sexual figures; over the facade of ‘helping’ animals everywhere. PETA displays these advertising campaigns at the expense of women. The exploitation of women stems from the manipulation of their images, PETA uses a touched up, airbrushed, photoshoped version of these women, therefore helping further unhealthy idealistic body stereotypes of a woman that media and society have already ‘gifted’ us. Satire, a commonly known M.O. of PETA is found among many of these adverts,
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or better known as ASPCA, works to prevent neglect and cruelty towards animals. Many of their advertisements and commercials begin by stating the fact that thousands of animals everyday suffer from abuse and neglect from their owners. These advertisements do work towards the overarching goal of ASPCA using factual information, emotional appeal, and visual representation of the issues.
The manipulative nature of the commercial targets adults with some sentimental connection towards animals. With the incorporation of logos directed towards the payment via credit or debit cards, directs the audience to be adults solely because someone has to be at least eighteen years old to own a credit or debit card, and that person has to have some sort of revenue to consistently donate to the ASPCA Organization as promoted. Similarly, the addition of pathos directs the audience to be older generations because that audience would be wise enough to understand the problem, from personal or impersonal experiences, of abused animals that are tormented and left to fend for themselves for the rest of their lives. To reiterate, this ASPCA commercial uses rhetorical tools such as pathos and logos to manipulate the intended audience, adults with some sentimental connection to animals, and reveal the underlying purpose of gathering donations to benefit the organization’s
According to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), thousands of animals are abused every day. This does not specifically mean they suffer physical abuse- many animals suffer much more than that on a daily basis. Dozens are neglected, beat, and suffer cruel housing circumstances from their owners. Sadly, these innocent animals do not have a voice, and cannot express to humans the way they feel. The ASPCA states that every year thousands of animals are rescued, but there is still many more to be rescued. Their commercials ask viewers to become “angels” for helpless animals, by donating a monthly amount of money to the ASPCA. By showing different, abused, sad-looking animals and playing sad music in the background,
The emotional appeal in this picture is the dog that is chained up looks really sad. I don’t know one person that doesn’t either tear up or get sad when they see the pictures or commercials from the ASPCA. Dogs are most referred to as a man’s best friends and when you see one being treated like this it can really tug on someone’s heart and make them really emotional and want to help. The ASPCA is the biggest foundation in the United States for saving animals who are being neglected or abused by other people. At the bottom it says “Make a Monthly Gift” and this is a credible source because they even have a TV show that shows them saving the animals. “60 cents won’t buy much these days….. but for 60 cents A DAY you can help rescue animals in
Joy Sutton (Center) is a fifteen year old and is a victim of sepsis which almost took her life. In this ad we learn how children’s hospital can save a life. This situation not only grabs the audience by the hair, it makes them want to bring their kids there. Seeing any victim of sepsis especially at such young age will influence the audience to have faith in children’s hospital. Seeing the ad, sepsis now has a face, and that face is Joy. Doing this ad has given their audience something to believe in, while showing that they are committed to saving lives and how they focus on the kids. They are trying to get the audience to see the kids need them, whether you believe it or not. This ad uses pathos in a way that has influenced the audience to feel the need to bring their kids. What I mean by this is when people see this advertisement that experience different emotions as they may relate to Joy and the comfort level and professionalism of the staff, it may make you feel all types of emotions in which one may be sympathy for Joy and her family. Just as other products and companies have been countered by famous faces when OLOL use a simplistic approach with this little girl sharing her story in hopes that it capture the attention of its readers giving them something more than an unrealistic script from an actor/actress but someone real who story they can relate to . OLOL children’s hospital has successfully used an important part of our community that stands out the most and that is kids to draw our
This advertisement is an example of a slippery slope fallacy. A slippery slope fallacy is a continuum of events that keeps occurring without being stopped (Halpern, 2014). It is a continuous cycle of McCarthy trying to do a good deed by helping to save the environment, however, she always ends up getting hurt. Nonetheless, it ends with the Kia Niro having “over 40 MPG” which is a “smarter kind of crossover” meaning it is fuel efficiently. In addition, it is also an example of a testimonial fallacy. This fallacy is when a respected movie star endorses a belief or product and makes a conclusion from the information given (Halpern, 2014). For instances, Melissa McCarthy is a well known actress who is endorsing the product by using humor. Also, supporting a cause she believes in, which is saving the environment by driving the Kia
Would you want to be an animal that is getting neglected & harmed? ASPCA is trying to stop animal cruelty. So many animals are dying because of cruelty & neglect. Many are left out in the cold waiting for someone to come rescue them. By donating you can help an animal that is in need of help & care.
Everyday people see advertisements, whether it is displayed on commercials, radio stations or even in magazines. With high competition always submerging in the advertising world, companies are willing to do anything to catch an audience’s attention. One such company is PETA, People for the Ethical Treatments of Animals (PETA) is a nonprofit corporation that is worldly known for their “risky” publications to convey their message. In this campaign image, PETA is trying to argue against the production of meats by dehumanizing model, Traci Bingham, as an animal, using pathos to reach guilt of the viewers and presenting the slogan “ALL ANIMALS HAVE THE SAME PARTS”.
In this essay, I am going to explore the social, cultural and moral values in these advertisements and compare them to an advertising campaign that aims to shock but appears to have no real emotive value and it is just shocking for the sake of it. I will investigate whether shock advertisements are useful to society and do they have significance and worth, or does the value decrease when shock advertising is used without any real purpose other than to sell frivolous products?
The advertisement of the abused dogs is a representation of a hard truth happening in the world. The ad brings pity to the viewers with the use of pathos. The commercial of this advertisement’s purpose is to persuade the viewers to donate money to help the abused dogs. It gives off a negative vibe and makes people sad when they watch it; as a result, they do not take notice to it. It is an example of the kind of reality which people ignore because they rather keep it within the blindside, which compares to the message Thoreau gives; people must become aware of reality.
True H advertisement “Giving is the best communication” touched its audience with the message it carried. The advertisement contained some contrasted scenes to prove the purpose of giving. It even tried to emphasize the moral of giving by using certain colors and sounds. These effects affected the audience, which made it a compassionate advertisement. However, does this appeal to the emotions, values and beliefs of the audience?