3865 Words16 Pages

The Economics of Game Theory

Consider this :

Could Western management techniques be successfully implemented in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) ? Granted, they have to be adapted, modified and cannot be imported in their entirety. But their crux, their inalienable nucleus – can this be transported and transplanted in CEE ? Theory provides us with a positive answer. Human agents are the same everywhere and are mostly rational. Practice begs to differ. Basic concepts such as the money value of time or the moral and legal meaning of property are non existent. The legal, political and economic environments are all unpredictable. As a result, economic players will prefer to maximize their utility immediately (steal from the workplace, for instance) – than to wait for longer term (potentially, larger) benefits. Warrants (stock options) convertible to the company’s shares constitute a strong workplace incentive in the West (because there is an horizon and they increase the employee’s welfare in the long term). Where the future is speculation – speculation withers. Stock options or a small stake in his firm, will only encourage the employee to blackmail the other shareholders by paralysing the firm, to abuse his new position and will be interpreted as immunity, conferred from above, from the consequences of illegal activities. The very allocation of options or shares will be interpreted as a sign of weakness, dependence and need, to be exploited. Hierarchy is equated with slavery and employees will rather harm their long term interests than follow instructions or be subjected to criticism – never mind how constructive. The employees in CEE regard the corporate environment as a conflict zone, a zero sum game (in which the gains by some equal the losses to others). In the West, the employees participate in the increase in the firm’s value. The difference between these attitudes is irreconcilable.

Now, let us consider this :

An entrepreneur is a person who is gifted at identifying the unsatisfied needs of a market, at mobilizing and organizing the resources required to satisfy those needs and at defining a long-term strategy of development and marketing. As the enterprise grows, two processes combine to denude the entrepreneur of some of his initial functions. The firm has ever growing needs for capital : financial, human, assets and so on. Additionally, the company begins (or should begin) to interface and interact with older, better established firms.

Consider this :

Could Western management techniques be successfully implemented in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) ? Granted, they have to be adapted, modified and cannot be imported in their entirety. But their crux, their inalienable nucleus – can this be transported and transplanted in CEE ? Theory provides us with a positive answer. Human agents are the same everywhere and are mostly rational. Practice begs to differ. Basic concepts such as the money value of time or the moral and legal meaning of property are non existent. The legal, political and economic environments are all unpredictable. As a result, economic players will prefer to maximize their utility immediately (steal from the workplace, for instance) – than to wait for longer term (potentially, larger) benefits. Warrants (stock options) convertible to the company’s shares constitute a strong workplace incentive in the West (because there is an horizon and they increase the employee’s welfare in the long term). Where the future is speculation – speculation withers. Stock options or a small stake in his firm, will only encourage the employee to blackmail the other shareholders by paralysing the firm, to abuse his new position and will be interpreted as immunity, conferred from above, from the consequences of illegal activities. The very allocation of options or shares will be interpreted as a sign of weakness, dependence and need, to be exploited. Hierarchy is equated with slavery and employees will rather harm their long term interests than follow instructions or be subjected to criticism – never mind how constructive. The employees in CEE regard the corporate environment as a conflict zone, a zero sum game (in which the gains by some equal the losses to others). In the West, the employees participate in the increase in the firm’s value. The difference between these attitudes is irreconcilable.

Now, let us consider this :

An entrepreneur is a person who is gifted at identifying the unsatisfied needs of a market, at mobilizing and organizing the resources required to satisfy those needs and at defining a long-term strategy of development and marketing. As the enterprise grows, two processes combine to denude the entrepreneur of some of his initial functions. The firm has ever growing needs for capital : financial, human, assets and so on. Additionally, the company begins (or should begin) to interface and interact with older, better established firms.

Related

## Thoughts on Game Theory in Economics

1937 Words | 8 PagesAccording to Wikipedia, game theory is a branch of applies mathematics that is used in the social sciences (mostly economics). Game theory can also be defined as a theory of competition stated in terms of gains and losses among opposing players. Game theory tries to mathematically imprison behavior in strategic situations, in which a person’s success in making choices depends on the choices of others. Traditional application of this theory attempt find equilibrium in these games, in equilibrium. Every

## John F. Nash's Game Theory

732 Words | 3 Pagesknown for winning the Noble Prize back in 1994, the prize was for his landmark work of Economics. His differential geometry and partial different methods to equations have provided understanding into the forces that govern chance and events inside complex systems in our daily life. John’s concepts are used in market economics, computing, evolutionary biology, and artificial intelligence, accounting and military theory. He was a senior researcher mathematician at Princeton University in New Jersey, later

## The Contributions Of John Von Neumann's Game Theory

949 Words | 4 PagesJohn von Neumann introduced Game theory in 1928 when he proved his minimax theorem, the theorem postulates that in a zero-sum game (a confrontation with a persons gain being of opposite value to the competitors loss) with perfect information, certain strategies can minimize their maximum losses, to perceive one of these strategies, the player has to consider the responses of his opponent. Von Neumann extended the theorem to assimilate games with imperfect information and multiple players

## The concept of Nash equilibrium is fine in theory, but next to useless in practice.

562 Words | 3 Pages1. Introduction The theory of Nash equilibrium by John Nash (1951) has been a central concept in game theories and further more for a wide range from economics even to the social and environmental sciences studies. Besides the game theory, David (2012) has recalled that, there are three unrealistic traits of standard economic model of human behavior – “unbounded rationality, unbounded willpower, and unbounded selfishness – all of which behavioral economics modifies.” However, consider the assumption

## Game Theory Case Study

1509 Words | 7 Pagesconcerned about the situation of conflict between market players; such approach is often referred to as ‘Game Theory’. This study will focus on critical examination of theoretical and practical implications that are linked with game theory and strategic-decision making process. Economic issues related with applying game theory in the real world environment will also be addressed. Game theory is built on assumptions and observations done by many academics and non-academics in the past but only started

## Cooperative Game Theory Essay

1071 Words | 5 PagesIn the given course I am doing a comprehensive literature review of ‘cooperative game theory in the field of supply chain management.’ Cooperative game theory comes in nature when more than two parties in the supply chain network come together and form alliances to gain more payoffs as compared to what they were obtaining alone. In the last several decades, supply chain management has evolved to be a very interesting field of research. This field has recognized that the business processes are made

## The Foundation of Game Theory: John Von Neumann

1774 Words | 8 PagesThis research piece dives into the life of John Von Neumann, which was primarily one of mathematical and economic study. He was able to create the foundations of game theory, an invaluable model for decision-making in business and finance. He also made large contributions to the mathematical and physics-oriented worlds through his self-replicating automata and participation in the infamous Manhattan Project. This research also makes note of the importance of critical thinking and innovation in

## The Problems of Establishing a Standardised Methodology

1641 Words | 7 PagesWhen examining studies of economic performance, often trade and political influence is a key explanatory factor. If trade makes countries wealthy, then it is important to examine the roots of how goods for trade were produced from natural resources. Fernand Braudel brought the geographical survey as a methodological development in his acclaimed work, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Essentially, a historian will begin a study by examining the geographical nature

## Game Theory Essay

1785 Words | 8 PagesIn a game, you are usually trying to out beat your competition by using strategies. How you choose the strategy to play arise from your competitive sense. Your strategic skills determine if you are the winner or loser in this game. Many mathematicians had grew fascinate about the study of strategic games; moreover, the beginning of game theory started as a mathematical principle in a mathematical theory of probability letter written by B. Pascal in 1656 [6]. In 1944, the publication of Game Theory

## Microeconomics and the Board Game Monopoly

1018 Words | 5 PagesAll I ever needed to know about microeconomics I learned from the Hasbro board game Monopoly. Some people, like myself, need practical models in order to understand certain concepts and theories. In our text book The Economy Today it completely ignores the intrinsic value of business decisions because you can’t put a numeric value on it. The game Monopoly™ is all about the numbers. In the game of Monopoly™ you have goals: The object is to bankrupt all opponents. To do so, you must be dedicated

### Thoughts on Game Theory in Economics

1937 Words | 8 Pages### John F. Nash's Game Theory

732 Words | 3 Pages### The Contributions Of John Von Neumann's Game Theory

949 Words | 4 Pages### The concept of Nash equilibrium is fine in theory, but next to useless in practice.

562 Words | 3 Pages### Game Theory Case Study

1509 Words | 7 Pages### Cooperative Game Theory Essay

1071 Words | 5 Pages### The Foundation of Game Theory: John Von Neumann

1774 Words | 8 Pages### The Problems of Establishing a Standardised Methodology

1641 Words | 7 Pages### Game Theory Essay

1785 Words | 8 Pages### Microeconomics and the Board Game Monopoly

1018 Words | 5 Pages