What Was The Dunning School Of Reconstruction Case Study

1349 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cause of the civil war between north and south

1.) What was the Dunning School of Reconstruction? What were its beliefs and ideas? What are the other main schools of thought about Reconstruction and how do they differ from Dunning? The Dunning School was a gathering of history students who shared the school of thought, from Reconstruction time of American history. Its perspective supported the components of the preservationist ideals. For the most part, this consisted of rich landowners, representatives, and northern Democrats. It also included the Radical Republicans in the South. The perspective of the Dunning School overwhelmed academic and well-known portrayals of the period from around 1900 to the 1930s. Dunning School of Reconstruction was not only an understanding of history. …show more content…

The sensitivities of the "Dunningite" history specialists side with the white Southerners who opposed Congressional Reconstruction: whites who, rising under the flag of the Conservative or Democratic Party, utilized lawful resistance and roughness to remove the Republicans from state power. In spite of the fact that "Dunningite" history specialists did not underwrite the legal strategies, they did have a tendency to conceal them. Through and through, they contended, Radical Reconstruction needed a political …show more content…

The Northern troops needed to protect their homes and people and had the local support of the citizens. They also had more knowledge of the territory. It is considerably easier to take a man 's life when he is in your territory and coming after your people, then when you are on his. They took up guarded positions on the slopes in the range and forced the southern troops to assault up steep slants. Compelling them to run into enemy fire was the winning strategy. "Picket 's Charge," was a southern assault on the flank of the Northern protective line, and the south was compelled to

Show More
Related

  • Battle Of Gettysburg

    1489 Words  | 3 Pages

    Once there the Union formed a strong defensive position that resembled that of a fishhook, with Culp's Hill and the two Round Tops anchoring each end. After reinforcements had arrived the Union position was three miles long. Meanwhile, the Confederate troops occupied Gettysburg and Seminary Ridge to the west. Lee did not dig his army in a defensive position at all. He believed that his own army was invincible, even though they were without out their cavalry, which was off somewhere harassing other Union soldier, but on the first day of battle, the confederates are victorious

    Read More

  • North Or South Who Killed Reconstruction Dbq Analysis

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although it wasn’t the main reason reason Reconstruction ended, northern neglect was still a significant problem. “...in the 1870s, Northern voters grew indifferent to events in the South. Weary of the ‘Negro question and ‘sick of carpet-bag’ government, many Northern voters shifted their attention to such national concerns as the Panic of 1873 and corruption in Grant’s administration….” (Harper’s weekly Doc C) If we want to know as much information as possible about how the North lost interest in Reconstruction we must understand the

    Read More

  • Why the South Could Not Win the Civil War

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    The right military strategy is the key to a war. In order for the South to win the war, they would have needed to apply what is now called a blitzkrieg strategy. This would have been a quick decisive attack on the North to follow up its early victories of Manassas in the East and at Wilson's Creek and Lexington in the West.

    Read More

  • The Killer Angels Analysis

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    A numerous amount of generals and soldiers of the south had a predisposed idea regarding what every person was fighting for, and from the looks of it, they were more so on the same page. When referring to what the war was being fought over, Englishmen Pickett used an analogy that gives reference to a “gentlemen’s club”, and not being able to maneuver out of it (Shaara 88). The men believed that the war conceived out of the misinterpretation of the constitution in regards to what or what not they had the right to do. In all, a large number of those fighting believed that the confederate army fought to protect the southern society, and slavery as an integral part of

    Read More

  • South Killed Reconstruction

    685 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Although political violence continued in the South…the tide of public opinion in the North began to turn against Reconstruction policies.” Some may think this meant the North was killing Reconstruction but the North can’t help the South if they’re going to keep rebelling and trying to take over. They can’t help people who don’t want to be helped. “In the fall of 1873, even the staunchly [firmly] pro-Grant and pro-freedman Boston Evening Transcript ran a letter…arguing that “the blacks, as a people, are unfitted for the proper exercise of political duties.” In the North’s defense, this was kind of true, since most blacks were uneducated and the Black Codes prevented them from many rights which were needed as politicians. Like the right of assembly. My thesis is correct. Though the North did have some actions that may have impacted Reconstruction in a negative way, most of them were for a reason and made sense.

    Read More

  • Why The North Won the Civil War

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    The American Civil War was fought between the North (The Union) and the South (The Confederates), because of the South wanting to secede from the North. Lincoln's election as president in 1860, triggered southerners' decision to secede believing Lincoln would restrict their rights to own slaves. Lincoln stated that secession was "legally void" and had no intentions of invading the Southern states, but would use force to maintain possession of federal property. Despite his pleas for the restorations of the bonds of union, the South fired upon the federal troops stationed at Fort Sumter, in Charlestown, Virginia. This was the event that decided the eventual beginning of the Civil War. Despite the advantages of Northerners, their victory in the ...

    Read More

  • Essay About Reconstruction

    542 Words  | 2 Pages

    The social history regarding reconstruction has been of great controversy for the last two decades in America. Several wars that occurred in America made reconstruction efforts to lag behind. Fundamental shortcomings of the reconstruction were based on racism, politics, capitalism and social relations. The philosophy was dominant by the people of South under the leadership of Lincoln. Lincoln plans were projected towards bringing the states from the South together as one nation. However, the efforts of the Activist were faded by the intrusion of the Republicans from the North. Northerners were capitalists and disapproved the ideas that Lincoln attempted to spread in the South (Foner Par 2).

    Read More

  • Why Did Reconstruction Fail?

    945 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cassel, S. (2008, June 1). The Failure of Reconstruction. History conection. Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://www.flamingnet.com/bookreviews/resources/essays_bookreviews/reconstruction.cfm

    Read More

  • Reconstruction in America After the Civil War

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    America has gone through many hardships and struggles since coming together as a nation involving war and changes in the political system. Many highly regarded leaders in America have come bestowing their own ideas and foundation to provide a better life for “Americans”, but no other war or political change is more infamous than the civil war and reconstruction. Reconstruction started in 1865 and ended in 1877 and still to date one of the most debated issues in American history on whether reconstruction was a failure or success as well as a contest over the memory, meaning, and ending of the war. According to, “Major Problems in American History” David W. Blight of Yale University and Steven Hahn of the University of Pennsylvania take different stances on the meaning of reconstruction, and what caused its demise. David W. Blight argues that reconstruction was a conflict between two solely significant, but incompatible objectives that “vied” for attention both reconciliation and emancipation. On the other hand Steven Hahn argues that former slaves and confederates were willing and prepared to fight for what they believed in “reflecting a long tradition of southern violence that had previously undergirded slavery” Hahn also believes that reconstruction ended when the North grew tired of the 16 year freedom conflict. Although many people are unsure, Hahn’s arguments presents a more favorable appeal from support from his argument oppose to Blight. The inevitable end of reconstruction was the North pulling federal troops from the south allowing white rule to reign again and proving time travel exist as freed Africans in the south again had their civil, political, and economical position oppressed.

    Read More

  • "The New View of Reconstruction"

    315 Words  | 1 Pages

    People attending schools before 1960’s were learning about certain “unscrupulous carpetbaggers”, “traitorous scalawags”, and the “Radical Republicans”(223). According to the historians before the event of 1960’s revision, these people are the reason that the “white community of South banded together to overthrow these “black” governments and restore home rule”(223). While this might have been true if it was not for the fact that the “carpetbaggers were former Union soldiers”, “Scalawags… emerged as “Old Line” Whig Unionists”(227). Eric Foner wrote the lines in his thesis “The New View of Reconstruction” to show us how completely of target the historians before the 1960’s revision were in their beliefs.

    Read More

  • Hairspray: Taking Camp to the Next Level

    1303 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sokol, Jason. "IIP Digital | U.S. Department of State." White Southerners' Reactions to the Civil Rights

    Read More

  • Essay On Reconstruction

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    These Reconstruction plans are three different policies but the creators did share common ideas and opinions. All three had very similar goals. One major goal was to reintegrate the south back into the union as quickly as possible. The quicker the reunion of the two sections, the easier it would be to establish order and control. Similarly, another goal was to create order after the long p...

    Read More

  • Who Killed Reconstruction

    682 Words  | 2 Pages

    The North’s negligence also contributed to the end of Reconstruction. The North had failed to notice the many racially motivated atrocities that occurred in the South durin...

    Read More

  • Why the Southern States Believed they Could Win the Civil War

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...f wearing down the north's patience. The south's idea of northerns as "city slickers" who did not know how to ride or shoot was wrong. Many of the men who formed the Union forces came from rural backgrounds and were just as familiar with riding and shooting as their southern enemies. Finally, the south's confidence in its ability to fund through sales of export crops such as cotton did not take into consideration the northern blockade. France and Britain were not willing to become involved in a military conflict for the sake of something they had already stockpiled. The help the south had received from France and Britain turned out to be a lot less than they expected. In conclusion, while all the south's reasons for confidence were based on reality, they were too hopeful. The south's commitment to a cause was probably what caused their blindness to reality.

    Read More

  • The Central Theme of Southern History by Ulrich B. Phillips

    1616 Words  | 4 Pages

    Imagine a historian, author of an award-winning dissertation and several books. He is an experienced lecturer and respected scholar; he is at the forefront of his field. His research methodology sets the bar for other academicians. He is so highly esteemed, in fact, that an article he has prepared is to be presented to and discussed by the United States’ oldest and largest society of professional historians. These are precisely the circumstances in which Ulrich B. Phillips wrote his 1928 essay, “The Central Theme of Southern History.” In this treatise he set forth a thesis which on its face is not revolutionary: that the cause behind which the South stood unified was not slavery, as such, but white supremacy. Over the course of fourteen elegantly written pages, Phillips advances his thesis with evidence from a variety of primary sources gleaned from his years of research. All of his reasoning and experience add weight to his distillation of Southern history into this one fairly simple idea, an idea so deceptively simple that it invites further study.

    Read More

More about What Was The Dunning School Of Reconstruction Case Study

Open Document