Everyday individuals are faced with difficult situations, and in some cases these situations bring into question a person’s moral code. These dilemmas make people think about what the right thing to do is and what the wrong thing to do is. Any person can follow the four basic frameworks of ethics to figure out what needs to be done. Those frameworks being ethical egoism, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. But first I will put you in a tricky situation and shed some light on the different routes an individual could take according to those four ethical frameworks. Then I will give my opinion on what I would do in the situation and I will state some objections a critic might have on my opinion.
Consequences of these actions could lead to federal investigations which in turn will cost the city and its tax payers millions of dollars. The actions of the Mayor did not represent the greater good for anyone, as the benefit will be short term for all. The gifts will eventually discontinue once allegations and investigations begin to surface. The contractors will eventually lose their contract, which could result in current employees losing their jobs. The financial consequence to the corruption of the Mayor will leave a lasting effect on that community. For example, the city corrupt contractors usually do not produce the end result as promised, leaving the residents with the feeling of distrust and ineffective leadership by the government.
Ethical behavior is the way that a person should act using a set of rules or standards that have been formed within a community of people. These communities may be those of a religion or those of a geographic region. There are several different sets of ethical codes that are created. Something that is ethical in one community is not in another. Deciding what action is the ethical choice is one of the hardest choices of any decision. An example that brings ethics into play is deciding weather or not to bribe an elected official to get a governmental contract. Without looking at existing law, some might say that it is unethical to create an unfair advantage for one company over another. Rationalizing a decision as ethical may be hard. In this situation employees or lobbyists for the corporation may claim that it would be unethical to not do absolutely everything in their power to bring business to the company. By not doing so it would hurt the employees, stockowners, and investors. Is it ethical to hurt the financial well being of so many people? Looking from the point of view of all of the other companies looking to get a piece of this government contra...
This is a white collar crime and it’s one of the reasons why we should not have lobbyist in our government. Abramoff swindled money from one interest group took that money for his own personal gain as well as bribing elected government officials. In my opinion, I think that all of the elected officials in government are taking bribes because they all need money t...
combating bribery of foreign public officials. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(4), 385-405. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/197995609? accountid=34899
Many people will take bribes without thinking of the effects it may have on others.
I'm certain you are very familiar with the most recent scandal regarding a 47 million dollar, “no bid” deal with Talgo Inc. involving Governor Doyle and Mayor Barrett. State Representative Robin Vos described the deal as a "rigged" process. If such a “deal” occurred in my hometown there would have been an immedi...
Many people may think that a being a paralegal is just like being a lawyer, but that is not the case. In fact, there are different types of paralegals just like there are different types of lawyers. These are some of the different types of paralegals that are out there: intellectual property (“IP”) paralegals, family law paralegals, and bankruptcy paralegals (“What Are The Different Types Of Paralegals?” n.d.). According to, “What Do Paralegals Do? (n.d.),” the duties of a paralegal are, “Conduct client interviews and maintain general contact with the client, locate and interview witnesses, conduct investigations, statistical and documentary research, conduct legal research, draft legal documents, correspondence and pleadings, summarize depositions, interrogatories and testimony, attend executions of wills, real
... it is the client or beneficiary of patronage that may not be well-equipped. Effective use of patronage has several benefits. It has contributed to government accountability; can be used to increase representation from underrepresented groups in government, especially in a highly diverse nation like Canada. It can also be used to bridge political gaps and create coalitions, just as was done by former U.S. Presidents Reagan and Clinton, who used patronage to alter policy orientations of the Federal Trade Commission as well as the Federal Communications Commission; not only that, but patronage was employed to emphasize conservation by attempting to alter the direction of the US Forest Service. So instead of doing away with the entire system of patronage, it must be improved with a more rigorous vetting process to confirm or reject the client’s abilities and integrity.
These officials are in federal, state, and local government across the nation, and include police officers, judges, school superintendents, politicians, and top school officials – just to name a few. With the insurgence of federal funds given to states and cities as stimulus money, public corruption cases continue to rise because of individual greed and an egotistical faulty perception of dispensation from ethical behavior. (Thomas, Ryan, Date, & Cook,