Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociological Perspective Explaining Deviance
two theoretical approaches as applied to deviance
deviance research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sociological Perspective Explaining Deviance
All everyone wants is to live in a perfect society where there is no violence, burglary, and vandalism. In reality, deviance exists everywhere in the social world because little acts of violence can generate into deviant behavior in the community. It varies through culture and time because each individual holds different attitudes towards crime. For instance, criminals hold different attitudes toward crime as the general public do. They have rejected the norms of society. However, sociologists define and explain the concept of deviance in a different way than the general public do because sociologists wants to understand why individuals or social groups rejected social norms by committing little acts of violence. As Kendall (2012) states, This theory is based on the work of Sociologist Edwin Sutherland. Differential association theory states that people learn criminal behavior through the social groups with which they associate. If a person associates with a group that defines criminal behavior as acceptable, the person will probably engage in criminal behavior due to their influence. The theory stresses the impact that others have on one’s view of deviant behavior (Kendall, The differential association theory takes place when individuals are exposed to definitions unfavorable or favorable to deviant behavior and individuals learn, adapt, and apply these definitions in their life. In Alegria’s situation, he was exposed to aggressiveness, violent, and sexual assault at an early age. He was exposed to actions favorable to criminality. Throughout his life, he was somewhat agreeable to these definitions of right and wrong because he was not capable of creating his own perceptions. He was not capable of creating his own perceptions because he was learning deviant behavior through his family. His family viewed criminal behavior as acceptable because his Kyle’s parents allowed him to watch horror and pornographic movies. They also allowed someone to rape their son without a consequence. As a result of his parents’ actions, he was engaged in criminal behaviors due to his parents’ influence (Tucson,
“Animal Kingdom” is a movie about the criminal story of a 17 years old boy call Josh. His mother was died due to heroin overdose, he had no choice but to live with his grandma and the three uncles. The story is about how Josh was influenced by this crime family and to step in an uncontrollable situation. In the movie “Animal Kingdom”, the main character Josh has committed in crime, for example he stole a car, provided false declaration, and shoot dead. The differential association theory and self-control theory will be used to explain Josh criminal behaviors. The differential association theory suggested that criminal behaviors is a process of learning through interaction and communication with others (Sutherland, 1947). The self-control theory
There are many different views on the origins of criminal behaviors within societies. One possible reason for why people commit crimes could be because they learned it from others. Edwin Sutherland works to explain this tactic through his theory of differential association. His theory states that criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others in intimate, personal groups. The learning of criminal behavior depends on the strength of the relationship with those who commit deviant actions. This learning also depends on their definitions of legal codes. For example, some people in society rationalize traffic speeding if it is only a couple miles over the speed limit while others are strongly against speeding at any degree. When a person’s
Differential associations vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity. Referring to the contact an individual must have with proponents of criminal behavior; this principle suggests that there is a varying, but direct, relationship that affects how often, for what length of time, how important, and how intense deviant behavior
Church, W. T., Wharton, T., & Taylor, J. K. (2008). An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(1), 3-15.
Deviance is defined as the violation of norms —or rules or expectations. (Henslin, Essentials of Sociology) Social Control is then defined as a group’s formal and informal means of enforcing the norms. (Henslin, Essentials of Sociology) These two concepts become very important when discussing societal behaviors and guidelines. The film entitled Boys N’ the Hood is a notable example that clearly shows deviance and social control put into action.
Akers (2000) states that, “The principle of differential Association is that a person commits criminal acts because he or she has learned “Definitions” (rationalizations and attitudes) favorable to violation of law in “excess” of the definitions unfavorable to violation of law” (p. 73). The key notion of Akers’ theory is that individuals who commit crime, do so because they have educated themselves on various types of behaviors and attitudes that dwell on law-breaking. This also happens to be one of the perceptions included in Sutherland’s Differential Association
In this paper, I am going to going to examine the criminological theory of Differential Association theory by Edwin H. Sutherland. Also I am going to examine Kirk White from the film The Wild and Wonderful World of the Whites of West Virginia. Furthermore, I am going to apply Edwin H. Sutherland’s Differential Association theory to explain and understand the deviant actions of this character. I conclude that Differential association theory will explain why this character act in a deviant why.
Before the 1950’s theorists focused on what the difference was between deviants and criminals from “normal” citizens. In the 1950’s researchers were more involved exploring meaning and reasons behind deviant acts. This led to the most dominant question in the field of deviance, “what is the structural and culture factors that lead to deviant behavior?” This question is important when studying deviance because there is no clear answer, everyone sees deviance in different ways, and how deviance is created. Short and Meier states that in the 1960’s there was another shift in focus on the subject of deviance. The focus was what causes deviance, the study of reactions to deviance, and the study of rule breaking and rule making. In the 1960’s society was starting to speak out on what they believed should be a rule and what should not; this movement create chaos in the streets. However, it gave us a glimpse into what makes people become deviant, in the case it was the Vietnam War and the government. Short and Meier also write about the three levels that might help us understand were deviance comes from and how people interact to deviance. The first is the micro level, which emphasizes individual characteristics by biological, psychological, and social sciences. The second level is macrosociological that explains culture and
The first criminological theory, that explains behavior of the drug sellers, is the theory of Differential Association. Differential Association, termed by Edwin Sutherland, argued that persons engage in delinquent behavior because they learn it from society and they engage in it when it benefits them. By this, he is saying that an individual will be a criminal if they experience an excess of criminal definitions over conventional definitions. Sutherland discovered that Differential Association is developed through various stages and he explains such development with the use of nine propositions. (Lily et al. 2011, 48) Such propositions are as follows: (1) criminal behavior is learned, (2) it...
Crime is an irrelevant concept as it is tied to the formal social control mechanism of the State; deviance is a concept that is owned by sociology thus our study should be the sociology of deviance, rather than criminology
This theory is that criminal behavior is learned during social interactions. For example, who you associate with. If you hang out with people that do crimes or delinquent behavior, you’ll eventually start doing them. I had some friends that I used to hang out with like that every weekend. They liked to throw rocks at cars, I eventually gave in one night, and did it as well. Later that night, after I dropped them off I got pulled over because the car I drove fit the description. The police found rocks, I didn’t know they were still in there, they were in the back seat where my friends sat. I got arrested, and taken to juvenile hall. The reason I even did this because, I saw how easy they got away with it. The stories they shared with me, telling me how they did it and how they never got caught. That is why I find this theory relatable. I associated with them, I started to notice how easy it was to do the things they do. I thought I could’ve gotten away with it. I shouldn’t have done those things, but I didn’t use my superego that night. I honestly ignored it, even though my head kept telling me, “you 're going to get caught!” Differential association can make you a criminal if you are around the activity you 'll eventually think how easy it is to do it. This one incident, that is costing me thousands changed my ways. Consequently, it cost me my dream to play college football. Yet this theory can make law abiding
Differential association theory best explains the burglary deviance. There are many principles associated with this type of learning theory. Edwin Sutherland’s theory discusses how crime is a learned behavior where one’s family, peers, and environment are of great influence. Differential association theory seeks to prove that criminal behavior is learned and this paper will evaluate the connection between the two.
There exists conflicting theories among sociologists in the area of determining why a person is considered to be a deviant, and the reasons behind why he or she has committed a deviant act. From a positivistic perspective, deviance is based on biological or social determinism. Alternatively, from a constructionist perspective, deviance is created and assigned by society. Both perspectives seek to give a theory for why a person may become known as deviant. Although they both view similar acts as deviant, the basic differences between positivists and constructionists theories are clear.
The study of criminology involves many different theories in which people attempt to explain reasoning behind criminal behavior. Although there are many different theories the focus of this paper is the comparison and contrasting sides of The Differential Association Theory (DAT) of Edwin Sutherland and the Neoclassicism Rational Choice Theory. The Differential Theory falls under Social Process Theories which focuses on sociological perspective of crime. The Rational Choice Theory falls under Neoclassicism which believes that criminal behavior is ultimately a choice.
The importance of integrated theory relies on these social institutions to create a theory of the causes criminal behavior in the sense that it links to the family who is bonded to the offender in which he learn most of his behaviors from due to lack of guidance or support of his or her goals while growing up. This is where he attaches himself to peers to seek the sense of feeling important within society; this is where the child feels valued by doing crazy things with his friends who value him, but don’t have his best interest in mind. This type of social control illustrates that the individual takes into account the opinion of others to help guide his or her decision in life, which could be right or wrong therefore, it is important to enhance this individual with positive guidance with support by their