The Destructive Nature of Censorship Exposed in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451

893 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: what changes does guy montag undergo since the beinning of farenheight 451

Allowing for censorship to take part in any society is a domino effect that one-by-one removes all of its citizen’s rights and freedoms. In both societies, Bradbury’s and Fahrenheit 451, the government takes the driver’s seat and regulates what info the citizens can and will receive. Not only us this limiting the amount of knowledge learned, but is also puts all the power into selective and few hands. Lifeless and powerless, citizens are falling victim as the government controls them like puppeteers. All this control by censorship will eventually lead to a totalitarian nation. In Fahrenheit 451 the main character Guy Montag lives within this constrained world. Their main source for freedom of knowledge and creativity is through books. However, that gateway is roped off by censorship, making all books illegal. The government would rather just burn the books and give society all the information they need rather than producing a two sided way that offers a choice (76). In this dystopian society people are only being fed certain information. This becomes problematic for Montag because he was never an ordinary man. His free thinking form of intelligence quickly sets him apart from his peers. His wife Mildred on the other hand is a perfect example of one of the government’s puppets. Like the rest of society, Mildred is vacant inside and has no capability for any emotions or reason. “We need not to be let alone. How long is it since you were really bothered? About something important, about something real?” (52) Here Montag directly addresses Mildred’s problem of avoiding all conflicts that would make for an intellectual being. This is because Mildred can always be found glued to the couch spending time with her family. Building dumb pe... ... middle of paper ... ...their intellectualism. The people in this deprived world are incapable of thinking independently and being able to hold meaningful conversations. “Nobody listens anymore. I can’t talk to the walls because they’re yelling at me. I can’t talk to my wife; she listens to the walls. I just want someone to hear what I have to say” (125). Once Montag starts reading, he realizes how out of place he is anymore. There is no one to connect with because he is not conforming to the world and their rejection to free thinking. The government does not give any opportunity to think originally. Mindless entertainment, like the Parlor, is the center is their existence. Unable to distinguish what is real anymore, the citizens blindly follow the controlling government into the dark. Works Cited Bradbury, Ray. “Fahrenheit 451.” New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks 2013.

Show More
Related

  • Fahrenheit 451 Critical Thinking Quotes

    1081 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Ray BradBury’s fiction novel “Fahrenheit 451,” BradBury paints us a dystopian society where every citizen lacks the ability to think critically. Citizens are known to have short term memory, a lack of empathy for others, and an addiction to short term pleasures such as loud music and television. The main character Montag, once a societal norm in the beginning of the book, goes through a series of changes that fundamentally influences him to rebel against this society for their practice of igniting books. Bradbury uses specific events in Montag's transformation throughout the book, such as his conversations with Clarisse and his conversation with his wife’s friends, to help Montag realize that he isn’t

    Read More

  • Censorship Quotes In Fahrenheit 451

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Fahrenheit 451, the government exercised censorship supposedly for the purpose of happiness. Through technology and media, the government was able to eliminate individuality by manipulating the mind of the people into believing the propaganda of what happiness is. The people’s ignorance made them obediently abide that they failed to realize how far technology and the media have taken control of their minds. The free thought of characters such as Montag and Clarisse collided with that of Captain Beatty, who strongly believe in and enforce the censorship, and the firemen, whose role was to burn illegal books; these clashes were Bradbury’s way

    Read More

  • Extreme Censorship in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451

    719 Words  | 2 Pages

    3) This made the reader not only visualize the hose but get a feel for the mood

    Read More

  • Censorship And Conformation In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 opens with Guy Montag, a fireman, reminiscing of the pleasures of burning. As the story unfolds, we learn that Montag is a fireman who rids the world of books by burning all that are found. Walking home one night Montag meets Clarisse, his strong minded neighbor. She begins peppering him with questions. Clarisse doesn’t go along with societal norms and Montag realizes that immediately. “I rarely watch the 'parlor walls ' or go to races or Fun Parks. So I 've lots of time for crazy thoughts, I guess.” (Bradbury 3) Clarisse uses her imagination brought by stories from books and family instead of watching television. Clarisse helps Montag realize that the government induced censorship and conformation is stifling society’s education and imagination. Montag’s wife, Mildred ,is incapable of having a personal conversation with Montag. She conforms to societal standards and is greatly

    Read More

  • Theme Analysis of Fahrenheit 451

    432 Words  | 1 Pages

    The theme of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 can be viewed from several different angles.  First and foremost, Bradbury's novel gives an anti-censorship message.  Bradbury understood censorship to be a natural outcropping of an overly tolerant society.  Once one group objects to something someone has written, that book is modified and censorship begins. Soon, another minority group objects to something else in the book, and it is again edited until eventually the book is banned altogether.  In Bradbury's novel, society has evolved to such an extreme that all literature is illegal to possess.  No longer can books be read, not only because they might offend someone, but because books raise questions that often lead to revolutions and even anarchy.  The intellectual thinking that arises from reading books can often be dangerous, and the government doesn't want to put up with this danger.  Yet this philosophy, according to Bradbury, completely ignores the benefits of knowledge.  Yes, knowledge can cause disharmony, but in many ways, knowledge of the past, which is recorded in books, can prevent man from making similar mistakes in the present and future.

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Technology Quotes

    1585 Words  | 4 Pages

    The government in the book is very keen on censorship. Everyone just follows the government and believes that if books are banned nothing good could possibly come from them, but some people, like Montag, begin to ask themselves what is so bad about books? What is funny to me is that in the book Bradbury conveys that people really don’t have many beliefs or value anything other than technology, but there are a select few like Montag that want to challenge that. Beatty says to Montag, “The important thing for you to remember, Montag, is we’re the Happiness Boys, the Dixie Duo, you and I and the others. We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought.” (BradBury 62). From the quote one can tell that Beatty is happy with everybody being alike. He thinks that he is actually doing good by saving the people who want to be different, which will cause rebellion in the long run The government thinks that those who have “conflicting” theories are making everybody unhappy. Another way the government limits the people is by limiting the idea and belief of knowledge. At the time Montag doubts why books are immoral material Beatty explains to him that the knowledge contained in books is considered a weapon. Beatty says, “The word intellectual of course, became the swear word it deserved to be. You always dread the unfamiliar.” (Bradbury 58). To have intellect and to challenge ideas is ignored and said to be unfamiliar, and these people are trained to “dread” the unfamiliar. By ignoring the ability to be knowledgeable society is being ruined. Some might say that by dreading the unfamiliar can lead to less confusion, but confusion is a good thing because it means you are trying to understand the problem. Evidently one can see that by ignoring people’s beliefs and ideas society will destroy

    Read More

  • Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451: A Cautionary Tale

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau, a famous American author, once said that “What is the use of a house if you haven't got a tolerable planet to put it on?” Essentially, Thoreau believed that even though most individual people are tolerable, society as a whole is not. Ray Bradbury reflects upon Thoreau’s ideas in his novel entitled Fahrenheit 451. In the novel, Guy Montag, the protagonist, realizes that his supposed utopia society is actually a dystopia. Montag finally realizes this when Clarisse, his young neighbor, asks him if he is happy. Although, Montag believes that he is happy, it becomes clear later in the novel that he is not. Montag finds countless faults in the society he lives in. Throughout the novel, Bradbury’s goal is to show the reader some faults in the world today, such as our education system and the effects of technology on lives.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Censorship In Fahrenheit 451

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is too much technology taking over our brains to the point where knowledge is not given any place? Ray Bradbury author of Fahrenheit 451 gives a great example of censorship in their society. To summarize Montag is a middle aged fireman who is portrayed as a man who is forced to follow the orders of the government by burning books. First, the society experiences rejection towards books because the government has made them illegal. Then the lack of books affects education because people cannot make decisions for themselves. Lastly, the absence of books in the society has affected humanity because the citizens are suffering depression. Ray Bradbury’s

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Censorship Quotes

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    cigarette people are weeping? Bum the book. Serenity , Montag. Peace, Montag. Take your fight

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Analysis

    857 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... ideas in books and understand them. Before this Montag never questioned the way he lives, he was blinded by all the distractions. The role that Clarisse plays in the book enables Montag to break free of the ignorance.

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Banned

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine a world of uniformity. All people look the same, act the same, and love the same things. There are no original thoughts and no opposing viewpoints. This sort of world is not far from reality. Uniformity in modern day society is caused by the banning of books. The novel "Fahrenheit 451" illustrates a future in which the banning of books has risen to the extent that no books are allowed. The novel follows the social and moral implications of an over censored society. Even though the plot may seem far-fetched, themes from this book are still relevant today. Although some people believe that banning a book is necessary to defend their religion, the negative effects caused by censorship and the redaction of individual thought are reasons why books such as "Fahrenheit 451" should not be banned.

    Read More

  • The Paradox Of Censorship In Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury

    1268 Words  | 3 Pages

    While much of the society believes the censorship is what provides for a successful society, Montag is one of a few that believe the opposite. This theme is expressed literally in that way, but there is deeper meaning to Bradbury’s discussion of government involvement in censorship. Fahrenheit 451 was first written in 1951, a time when television was becoming a viral piece of mass communication. As a writer, Bradbury had to make a choice that in his eyes, allowed readers to be captivated by a literal story but be able to read between the lines as if reading through eyes that aren’t their own (Foster 226). Bradbury chose to use the main and dynamic character to be the one who is realizing the true nature of what censorship is doing to the society to open the eyes of Americans. Everything that happens in the novel is a metaphor alerting readers of the future Bradbury is worried

    Read More

  • Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451

    609 Words  | 2 Pages

    Society was confronted during an era when it questioned change in itself. For example Beatty said “and the books say nothing! Nothing you can teach or believe” (Bradbury 62). This shows that persevering against society will attract others to miss lead people; however they must follow themselves and set the path that they wish to continue down. How this show that is that Montag thought differently about the suppression of books, and became aware how society saw it. In addition Mrs. Phelps Mildred’s friend said “Why don’t you just read us one of those poems from your little book” (Bradbury 98). This shows that Montag had persevered against censorship until others were in dismay, and until they were at a point where they had to use others to help them defend themselves. How this shows that is when people persevere against others and their beliefs they will be recognized and others will try to tear them down. If people persist against society it will push back.

    Read More

  • Ray Bradbury's Impact On Society

    1125 Words  | 3 Pages

    The novel, many instances, exhibits censorship with the banning of books, the beating of the “bright kids” because they are out of the norm, and the use of the mechanical dogs as weapons to control justice in society (----- 55).”Also, “No one house stands out (De Koster 89),” shows the government’s censorship on an individuals’ imagination and creativity to stand out from the rest of society in Fahrenheit 451. Coincidently, free speech was being threatened at the same time Fahrenheit 451 was being published (Mass 6). Another instance of censorship was of Bradbury mentioning that porches were stopped being made and viewed as useless because they did not want people to do nothing, rocking on the chairs, and talking which was an action against society. The main reason the government in Fahrenheit 451 did not allow the construction of porches was in order to prevent an individual from thinking and gaining a stream of consciousness (----- 60). Censorship was so significant in the novel that it led the governing officials to use their mechanical hounds to go and capture Montag, an advocate of free speech/thinking, which was a threat to society (----- 126). The whole censorship situation even went as far as viewing the word ‘intellectual” as a swear word in the community (----- 55). Lastly, in addition to the

    Read More

  • Deception of Happiness in Fahrenheit 451

    741 Words  | 2 Pages

    Because the Government removed the ability to question, the people in Fahrenheit 451 have deceived themselves into believing that they are happy. Guy Montag had been harbouring books for quite a long time, but only recently made it known to his wife. She had friends over, and he took out a poem book and read from it, in front of his wife’s dumbfounded friends. “Then he began to read...Mrs. Phelps was crying. The others...watched her crying grow very loud as her face squeezed itself out of shape....She sobbed uncontrollably... "Sh, sh," said Mildred. "You're all right, Clara,... Clara, what's wrong?" "I-I,", sobbed Mrs. Phelps, "don't know, don't know, I just don't know, oh oh...””. The poem book caused Mrs. Phelps to actually think about her life for the first time ever. Government censorship prevented the people from ever being exposed to material that would make them question. For the first time, she thought about her l...

    Read More

More about The Destructive Nature of Censorship Exposed in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451

Open Document