Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How auditor can be independent
Auditor professionalism
How auditor can be independent
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How auditor can be independent
The term audit is being used with increased repetition and not just in the financial sector but also in education, medicine and environment among other issues. Audit tries to deliver higher accountability, precision and standards to the users of financial standards, especially since the separation between ownership and management had occurred in the 19th century, and with it the need of the stakeholders of being assured that their investments are in reliable hands. A definition of audit is given by Crawford et al and it signalises the expectation of the users regarding the audit report. Concepts as ’transparency’ and ’independence’ are not easy to define and put in practice, transparency referring not only to the audit statements but also …show more content…
One of the independence concepts, formulated by Mautz and Sharaf deals with practitioner independence, which has three branches: programming, investigative and reporting independence. The first one deals with the auditor’s liberty in choosing the features and the terms of reference of the audit strategy and methods without exterior intrusion, the second deals with the admission of the auditor to all information regarding the company. Last, the auditor must be independent from external authority and influence in order to form assessments and judgements. The practitioner independence fused with the absence of influence is defined as professional independence; it also signifies a lack in self-interest when making objective opinions. Audit independence may be in danger if the auditor is perceived as deliberately benefitting the auditee’s well-being, this might happen because the auditor is attracted to a financial recompense or because of the close relationship between the auditor and the company or auditee or because of the consulting services. Whatever the case, the auditor and the auditing profession has to construct and nourish a favourable public opinion in the independence and truthfulness of the audit profession, if the organisation is to seen as
The audit committee must certify that the company’s auditors are independent. The audit committee must approve all professional services provided to the company by its independent auditors and ensure that auditors do not provide to the company any of the specifically prohibited services identified by SOX, such as bookkeeping services. The audit committee must receive and analyze key items of information from the independent auditors. These items of information include auditors’ analysis of critical accounting policies adopted by the
Consult PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3520. What is the auditor independence, and what is its significance to the audit profession? What is the difference between independence in appearance and independence in fact?
Individual Article Review Lily Cobian LAW/421 March 31, 2014 Ramon E. Ortiz-Velez Individual Article Review Introduction My article review is based on Sarbanes-Oxley and audit failure, a critical examination why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was established and why it is not a guarantee to prevent failure of audits. Sarbanes-Oxley Act talks about scandals of Enron which occurred in 2001 and even more appalling the company’s auditor, Arthur Anderson, found guilty of shredding company documents after finding out Enron Company was going to be audited. The exorbitant amounts of money auditors get paid to hide audit discrepancies was also beyond belief. The article went on to explain many companies hire relatives or friends to do their audits, resulting in fraud, money embezzlement, corruption and even the demise of companies. Resulting in the public losing faith in the accounting profession, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in 2002 by congress was designed to restrict what company owners and auditors can and cannot do. From what I gathered in the article, ever since the implementation of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act there has been somewhat of an improvement but questions are still being asked as to why there are still issues that are not being targeted in hopes of preventing more audit failures. The article also talked about four common causes of audit failure: unintentional auditor mistakes, fraud, fatigue and auditor client relationships. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct clearly states an independent auditor because it produces a credible audit, however, when there is conflict of interest, the relation of a former employer, or a relative or even the fear of getting fire...
The audit committee should respect the independent opinions from external auditors. Also, there should be certain amount of CPA in the Audit Committee of the Board.
The independence of mind or independence in fact means Betty has to have a state of mind that allow her to form an opinion without bias due to influence that compromises professional judgment. By having an independence of mind allowing an individual to perform his or her audit work with integrity, as well as, maintaining her objectivity and professional skepticism behavior. However, in this case, she did not have an independence of mind since she trusted Toby and she enjoyed working with him since he is also a CPA because it is easy for her to work with him compare to her other clients who do not have the accounting background. As a result, because of long-term relationship and trust that Betty has with Toby, it influenced her decision about the audit opinion. Additionally, to be independent in appearance Betty and her audit team must show unbiased professional judgment when she reviews her clients ' financial statements. Betty had Problems with independence in appearance because in the case study shown me that she has become too close to her client, Toby. Therefore, all auditors have to maintain their professional skepticism as well as maintain independence in their mental attitude and also independence in appearance to provide an unbiased opinion on
Introduction The debate regarding police independence versus police accountability has been hotly contested since at least the 1960s.1 At the heart of the debate are questions relating to the degree and manner of oversight to which police forces should be subjected, while maintaining the independence of those polices forces to carry out their duties free from undue political (or other) interferences. This essay examines the principles underlying the “independence of the office of constable”, the notion of responsible government, and how the interaction between these two ideas has been characterised in the literature. It will be demonstrated that police independence and responsible government (that is, police accountability) are not mutually exclusive concepts and that they can (and occasionally do) co-exist. The office of constable (or, police independence)
Michele will know when accountability is presence because she will see it on the floor. She will see the nurses practicing taking EBP and applying to their care. In a similar manner, Michele will also see accountability when they come to the follow-up quality improvement meetings and contribute on how the changes are going. In addition, depending on what EBP the unit decided to institutes Michele will be able to see data that backs up the nurses have been accountable.
Integrity in the accounting profession involves adhering to the rules and principles of the profession. This includes remaining free of conflicts of interest and maintaining client relationships in which the accountant can remain objective in discharging his or her responsibilities. This requires independence in fact and in appearance as mandated under section 1.200.001.01, Independence Rule the AICPA Code. In other words, no one should be able to view the accountant as being biased with respect to a client’s financial reporting due to an improper client relationship. Lack of integrity in accounting practices has been, and continues to be, a key element in the downfall of many institutions which has hurt the public trust in the accounting
John Cage has always been known as a controversial and new age composer. Some say that his pieces lack the very structure that makeup classic forms. I argue that John Cage’s work Living Room Music, despite instrumentation with no set pitch, has conclusive harmonies and is in the style of a Baroque suite. This is a strange concept for some because pitch has become such a focal point around harmonic analysis when in reality it can be determined simply by ensemble texture and dominate features.
Auditing has become quite a challenge in recent years due to all the fraud scandals that has been going on. Such is the case that government was required to intervene and created the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; one of most significant reforms related to public companies since 1934. Modern corporations aren’t ran by their sole proprietors anymore but by managers whose job is to protect their interest. Particularly this is one of the reasons why the demand of auditing arose due to the natural conflict of interest between the owner and the manager. Both of these individuals will naturally look out for their best interest and will forget about the other. The owner wishes to see his company grow while the manager wishes to grow his pockets; their interests
Audit Risk is the risk that an auditor has stated an incorrect audit opinion on the financial statements. It may cause the auditors fail to alter the opinion when the financial statements contain material misstatement. The auditor should perform the audit to lower the audit risk to a sufficiently low level. In the auditor’s professional judgement, the auditor should appropriately state a correct opinion on the financial statement
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.
Audit is a process to evaluate and review the accounts and financial statement objectively. We can divide it into internal auditors and external auditors. Internal auditors have a inner knowledge of business process. Auditor has access to the much confidential information and all levels of management. But they may lose their judgement and they are not acceptable by the shareholder. “The overall objective of the external auditors is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to report on the financial statements in acco...
On the other hand, there are other evidence which casted doubts on the benefits of an independent board. Persons (2005) found that a board which largely comprised of independent directors has no significant effect on the likelihood of financial statement fraud in the US. Instead, the study highlighted that the likelihood of financial statement fraud is lower when audit committee is comprised solely of independent directors. Despite audit committee is a subset of the main board which depends on the board composition, this finding may indicate the independence of audit committee rather than the board itself is more effective in addressing fraud risk.