Ethical Dilemmas Of Justice In Justice

My relative, Aiman, was a businessman. He owned a company, but recently, the company went into bankruptcy. He desperately need money to pay the debt to all his clients and people who invest in the company. He thought paying all the money would make his family less suffer, so he borrowed money from a loan shark. When his family knew about it, they were miserable. Having a debt to loan shark is worse than suffer from bankruptcy. He said that he was doing the right thing and he already thought thoroughly about the situation. However, people around him thought that was a wrong thing to do to his family. So what exactly is “just” and what is the “right” thing in this situation? How do people defined those words? The general definition of right is

Sandel gave several examples, which are about price gouging, awarding Purple Heart, and bailouts to Wall Street banks. There is a moral concern about what is “just” and what is the “right” thing to do in all of these cases. In the book, Sandel figured three ways of approaching these matters, which are welfare, freedom, and virtue. Many of the common debates about justice in society revolve around these three principles. Since people think differently, everyone will define differently on what is “justice” and what is “right.” Often moral disagreements occur between individuals, but many times these agreements occur within individuals. To resolve these conflicts, philosophers have employed moral reasoning to hypothetical and real life examples that the author employs throughout the the

What do you do? If I am the one who need to do the deciding, I will not choose to push an innocent and “know nothing” person to save five people on the track. Why might my decision change from the first dilemma? It is because we do have other options. The thing is we know that we cannot change what is happening. Maybe some people said that we need to push that one person in order to save the other five. How can we do that, since we know that the person have nothing to do in this situation? We cannot simply make him become the victim when he/she is completely clueless about what is happening. Why don’t we just throw ourselves if we truly want to save the five