Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The euro and its impact
Pro and cons of the euro
Pros an cons of adopting the euro
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The euro and its impact
The Debate of Britain Joining the Euro Currency
On the first of January 2002, several European countries joined the
Euro, a single
form of currency, which replaced these countries' own national
currency, meaning
that all countries that are a member of 'Euroland' accept the Euro as
their currency.
Among these countries were Ireland, France, Germany, and Italy. As
yet, Britain has
opted not to join the Euro.
Many argue that Britain should join the Euro, for both political and
economic reasons.
Economically, Britain is separated from the rest of the European
countries who have
adopted this currency, along with Sweden and Denmark who also opted to
stay out
of the Euro. This means that British businesses cannot share the
benefits of being
part of the Euro with the rest of Europe, as they are separated from
the main part of
the market by the variable exchange rate. British companies who export
to, import
from and invest in the rest of Europe will be less likely to do so in
future because of
uncertainty about profits because of changes in the currency and the
value of the
pound. The result will be British businesses retaining a more domestic
approach to
future investments, staying at home rather than investing abroad for
fear of loss in
profit. Equally, European companies will be reluctant to do business
in Britain. The
government's decision to opt out of the Euro means that British
companies risk
missing out on the benefits offered by membership of the Euro, such as
the
opportunity to be one of the leading exporters in 'Euroland'. In the
long term, it wi...
... middle of paper ...
...as a individual country,
as Romano Prodi,
President of the European Commission says: "The Euro can only lead to
closer and
closer integration of countries' economic policies… This demands that
member
states give up more sovereignty".
In conclusion, the issue of Britain joining the Euro is still a
much-debated one.
Whether the Government chooses to join the Euro or not, the decision
will affect the
country's economy. Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission
says of
joining the Euro: "By definition it's a permanent decision. You cannot
enter into
monetary union thinking you can do so for five years or so."
Britain's Government will have to think long and hard before coming to
any decisions
on the Euro, as it will affect our economy for now and for years to
come.
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
”Examine the extent to which the benefits of UK membership in the European Union outweigh the costs”
The United Kingdom, in the next year the people will get a chance to choose their countries’ fate in whether the United Kingdom should leave the European Union. What makes this important is that it would be the first country to leave the European Union in a time when other European countries are either in negotiation or planning to join so it would be a big deal as the United Kingdom is Europe’s third largest economy. As the people are about to vote on their future, there are concern as what would be the economical, social, and political consequences while for some what would be the benefit if the United Kingdom leave. Today In the next paragraphs I would explore the United Kingdom in the European Union and the Political economical and social
Britain has always had a difficult relationship with the European Union, initially refusing to become a member before reluctantly joining, there seems to be a level of distrust of the European policies. I will explore this distrust within this essay. This essay will also give an insight into the history of Britain, the EU and identify any changes in British government’s policies since becoming a member.
Shockingly, we just witnessed one of the biggest political earthquake in 21st century. After the Brexit poll on June 23rd, 2016, 51.9% people voted “leaving the European Union” compared to 48.1% voted to stay, which means UK has no other choices but withdraw from the European Union. This political earthquake may not only affect UK and EU for sure, but also influence the entire world. Although in class after our discussion we all agree on that there are lots of problems resulting from Brexit. It’s really hard to allege Brexit is a terrible decision, otherwise the majority of UK citizens will not vote for exit. So what are the costs or benefits of Brexit? I will analyze these benefits and costs from different perspective including political,
Dollarization is the replacement of a country’s domestic currency with that of a foreign currency. Dollarization has occurred in several countries including, but not limited to, Panama, El Salvador, and Ecuador. For countries with volatile currencies, dollarization offers them the ability to stabilize their economy. While dollarization has its pros, it is not without its cons, and for Ecuador, this is no exception. In my initial discussion, I believed that dollarization was a positive move for Ecuador; I still feel this way, and now that I have gained a bit more knowledge concerning the macro economy system, I understand how dollarization aided in Ecuador’s economy to stabilize. However, with all the positives associated with Ecuador’s adoption of the dollar, there are negative aspects as well, and there is no indication of how Ecuador will fair in the long run. In addition, the implications are not limited to the dollarizing country alone; there are pro et contra to the United States and the economies of countries surrounding Ecuador.
Many people would agree that Europe is a continent in which regions identify with each other even if they are not part of the same country. For that reason, as well as others, in 1957 the Treaty of Rome "declared a common European market as a European objective with the aim of increasing economic prosperity and contributing to 'an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe'" (www.euro.ecb.int). Later, in 1986 and then in 1992, the Single European Act and the Treaty of European Union tried to build on the previous treaty to create a system in Europe in which one currency could eventually be used all over the land under the heading of the Economic and Monetary Union. (www.euro.ecb.int) However, the question remains, why would the leaders of various European nations want to create one currency when the rights of national sovereignty have always been an issue for countries all over the world. Why, in 1998 did they create the European Central Bank, and why in "The third stage of EMU... on 1 January 1999, when the exchange rates of the participating currencies were irrevocably set" (www.euro.ecb.int) did eleven, and later twelve, countries link themselves economically in a way that has never been done before?
To start with, what is the meaning of the Single Market? According to European Commission website, Single Market indicates the EU as one territory that has no internal borders or any other controlling complications that lead to the free movement of booth services and goods (The European Single Market - European Commission, 2017). According to the same source, single market has great benefits. It encourages competition and trade, increases efficiency, promotes quality, as well as helps in cutting the prices. In addition, the same source considers the European Single Market as one of the EU’s ultimate accomplishments that powered the economic growth and made the everyday life of European businesses and consumers easier (The European Single Market - European Commission, 2017).
In 2014, the country of Scotland, prominent legislative members and citizens desired to leave the United Kingdom. This was controversial in many aspects, and I would like to analyze this referendum through the scope of two schools of thought, realism and liberalism, and the economic results of Scotland staying and leaving the UK. I will show that in liberalism that Scotland’s independence referendum was influenced by political actors, and can help Scotland have a bigger voice in the international world. I will show that this can also have a negative effect on Scotland in the international world as a result of rules and regulations prolong Scotland’ independence. I will show through realism how independence can hurt Great Britain and Scotland’s overall power it the world. Finally, I will explain from an economic standpoint the benefits and costs to Scotland and the UK when they split. This can lead to damaged relationships and overall slower economic growth. My goal is to expand upon the principles we learned in our political science class.
Changes in exchange rates that veer from the PPP , but also at the same time influence the path of a country's inflation. When we have high inflation our dollar it causes everything to become more expensive which in fact could take down companies and the need for jobs become more severe.
The recent global financial crisis that affected not only America but also Europe and other parts of the world resulted in massive unemployment. This is due to the high costs of operation that many corporations faced forcing them to cut on labor costs. There is need for European government interventions to avert this social crisis and prevent the occurrence of such a crisis in future. Unemployment has hit the service sector harder than other sectors with the following being the most affected: automotive, construction, tourism, finance and real estate. The global financial crisis has also increased consumer prices thus pushing inflation. According to McCathie, “the increase in July consumer prices to 1.7 per cent pushed inflation in the currency bloc up towards the European Central Bank’s target of keeping inflation at below, but close to 2 per cent. Eurozone consumer prices had stood at 1.4 per cent in June” (McCathie, 2010).
Walker, Bruce. "Euro Likely to Keep Losing Value." The New American. The New American Magazine, 7 July 2010. Web. 23 May 2011. .
Eurozone crisis has had huge impacts not only on the economy of the UE but also on the other countries who have economic and financial relations with the members of the union. The reason why we have decided to examine the Eurozone crisis in detail is to have a better understanding of the mechanisms behind this extremely important and complex problem and also to make accurate inferences about the solution alternatives. In our pape...
...ries such as Spain, Belgium, UK, Japan, and China. Future growth can be obtained through positioning current brands in those emerging markets.
The liberalization of capital developments and deregulation, particularly of fiscal administrations, prompted a spurt in cross-border capital flows. The globalization of financial markets has triggered a rapid growth in investment portfolio ...