Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The debate over vaccinations
Morality Vs Science Debate
Religious liberty essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The debate over vaccinations
Freedom of Religion Nothing means more to a parent than their children. What is at odds in the debate over vaccinations is how they show it. On one side, you have parents that believe that vaccinating their kids is the best way to keep them healthy. On the other side you have parents that believe saving their children’s souls is more important, and vaccinating their children goes against their religious beliefs. The 1st amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” That right is under attack by mandatory vaccinations in America. Whether we believe in vaccinations or not doesn’t matter, protecting religious freedom is what is at stake. Bobby Jindal said it best, …show more content…
That the state is basically committing moral coercion by not having vaccines available that don’t use fetuses, and forcing parents to act against their beliefs or put their children’s and others health at risk. That parishioners have a responsibility to find alternative vaccines. If there are not alternatives, then the parents aren’t condoning the use of aborted fetuses but protecting their children by using them, and it is not seen as a flaw in their beliefs. Much different than the other churches I discussed who believe that by using them it is assault on your beliefs and you will not go to heaven. The Vatican is more concerned with the greater good of the people in keeping everybody healthy (Catholic Church, 2005). Christian Scientists are similar to the Vatican’s view; in that they are not completely against vaccinations, but this is where the similarity ends. Christian Scientists favor spiritual healing. They believe that a calm Christian mind is more powerful against disease than any drug you can take to prevent them. They focus on paying attention to their thoughts, guarding against influences that would hurt them by spending quality time each day in silent sacred moments with God (Vidula,
There is a war going on against parents that refuse to vaccinate their children. It is coming from the government that makes and enforces laws requiring parents to vaccinate their children, hostile parents of vaccinated children, and doctors that refuse to see unvaccinated children. They are concerned about the potential health risk unvaccinated children pose to the public. These parents aren’t lunatics but are concerned parents that are trying to make the best choice for their children. In fact, these parents aren’t fighting alone; a number of pediatricians and medical experts are apart of this crusade and have taken the lead. They will tell you there is an agenda, “Vaccine manufacturers, health officials, medical doctors, lead authors of important studies, editors of major medical journals, hospital personnel, and even coroners, cooperate to minimize vaccine failings, exaggerate benefits, and avert any negative publicity that might frighten concerned parents, threaten the vaccine program and lower vaccination rates.” 4
For hundreds of years Americans have been growing up with the notion that it is a right to own a gun. Since the creation of the second amendment, people all over the United States have been able to guns for private use. Guns operated by the public are said to have a variety of uses such as, being able to protect oneself if conflict arises, grants the ability to put food on the table, and are used in competitions shooting targets against other people. But for many people guns have been seen as the root of all evil. Anti-gun users think that guns cause a variety of unexpected and innocent deaths. They also think that there are not enough laws in place that allow just about anyone to purchase a gun. The question of should guns be legal to all citizens has plagued our society. Do you think it is morally right for anyone to arm themselves and use it when they deem it to be necessary? Or do you think that the 2rd amendment seem unnecessary and outdated law that needs to be rewritten? These questions are just two of many that have thrown back and forth between pro-gun and anti-gun users.
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
While everyone has their own rights to their bodies and the bodies of their children, that does not mean that what they think is best for themselves or their children is best for the rest of the population they come into contact with. The majority of people associate vaccinations to babies and children under a certain age, but young adults and elders fall into the category of needing vaccinations. There is currently no federal law requiring adults or children to be vaccinated. Many positives come out of vaccinations to not only the individual, but also to the people they come in contact with. Currently there is an ongoing debate on whether or not vaccinations are safe and if they cause certain disorders in children. The risk of not getting
... today, there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow,” (“National Vaccine…”). Although this is an extremist view, it has a simple truth to it: America is a free country, which should guarantee that parents would have the freedom to choose against vaccination.
In the Constitution, it clearly states people’s freedom of religion. A lot of religions are against vaccinations, such as the Anabaptists (“Should Any Vaccines be Required for Kids?”). Some people are even being harassed by health officials because they are not getting vaccinated due to religious issues. Parents want to protect their legal rights as citizens and have the upper hand when it comes to deciding what is best for their child (Perry).
The biggest terrorist attack in American history occurred on September 11, 2001. The Islamic al-Qaeda group hijacked four airliners in the United States. Two planes crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City, a third struck the Pentagon, and the fourth plane crashed in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 people were killed including over 400 police officers and firefighters. America's view on the world and Muslims all over, forever changed. Muslims are judged and criticized still today after these events. Muslim Americans after 9/11 should have a right to live freely in America, can help us stop Islamic terrorism, and can increase unity with American citizens and the communities.
While some are in favor of using vaccines to protect their children from disease, and other ailments, there are still many people who see vaccinations as a con, and a violation of their civil and human rights to choose what is best for their children. The cause is that people are not giving their children or themselves vaccinated. This leads to the effect that society who comes in contact with them risks their own health, weather knowingly or otherwise. The pros for getting vaccination, leads to a healthier and a safer society. However, people still feel that they possess the right to choose their own way of life, even when it comes to their health. People opposed to vaccinations wish to make their own decision regardless of what their government says. Feeling that they are being robbed of their human and civil rights to choose. The people who are more likely to choose vaccination, are more likely to live longer and healthier lives, including their
Prayer in School: Good or Bad? As secular humanists and groups like the Christian Coalition are at war with each other regarding prayer in high schools behind closed doors in Washington DC, the average high school kid is the one that gets caught in the middle. For years now there has been a heated debate about whether or not prayer should be allowed in school. Every time the argument is rekindled, it ends in a stalemate, and is a topic that campaigning politicians tend to stay away from.
Ever since the Constitution was created, American was guaranteed the right of freedom of religion. However many Americans to this day believe otherwise, the media portrays that society is becoming more anti-God. We see schools suspending students who mentioned God or any other religious aspects due to the reasoning of not being sensitive to other students with different religions. Some school districts discussed the pledge of allegiance and its reference to God should be removed. The freedom of religion is also to have the ability to share the knowledge of your religion with other despite the commitment to another. How are we going to be understandable to others religions if we don’t understand theirs? The school board’s solution is to remove religion out of the whole school system. That’s just making students hold back on their freedom of religion, they can no longer express it.
In the world today religious freedom has become a major issue. Religion has a big influence on much of the violence that occurs every day. Religious discrimination is defined as the unequal treatment of an individual because of their beliefs. Statistics have shown an increase in religious hostilities in all of the other major religions in the world, except the Americas. The price of religious freedom seems to be getting harder and harder. Are we going to back down from our religions or take these circumstances in effect and build up our own religious armies against the enemies that the world contains?
Parents also believe that they deserve to have the rights to choose what medications are injected into their child because of religious reasons. Forcing someone to perform an act in violation of their religion is a violation of the 1st amendment of the constitution. (“Know…The Vaccine Controversy”.)
Those who choose not to vaccinate their children are endangering the health of those unable to be vaccinated themselves, such as infants, pregnant people, and the immunocompromised, by jeopardizing community immunity. According to vaccine.gov, a federal government website managed by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, community immunity or “herd immunity” occurs when “a critical portion of the community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak” (Community Immunity). An infographic featured in an NPR article entitled “How Vaccine Fears Fueled the Resurgence of Preventable Diseases” illustrated the rise in measles cases in Western Europe and of pertussis (whooping cough) cases in the U.S (Doucleff). In the first eight months of 2014, there were eighteen measles outbreaks, and six hundred cases of measles. This is incredibly dangerous because outbreaks give these diseases the opportunity to evolve and become resistant to vaccines, putting even vaccinated children at risk (Harmon). Parents making the decision not to vaccinate are doing so out of a place that all parents share: a desire to keep their children healthy. However, these anti-vaxxers are basing their decision not on
It’s been argued that the government shouldn’t have the authority to require vaccinations. While in most cases you should have a say in what you do with your body, immunizations are important. Most people would agree that you should do what is best for your body. Therefore, if everyone actually believed this, then everyone would be vaccinated already. The best solution to the outbreaks of life threatening diseases is immunizations. The government has the responsibility to protect people, including the people who can’t be vaccinated. In addition, vaccinating everyone who can be vaccinated protects those who cannot for health reasons. The government has the right to put laws in place that protect the greater good, in this case requiring vaccinations.
Many people think the definition of Freedom of Speech is “free speech” even though they