Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
argumentative assay about death penalty
argumentative assay about death penalty
argumentative assay about death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: argumentative assay about death penalty
Throughout much of America’s history there has been conflicting thoughts on the matter of taking the life of another in the pursuit of justice. Many have said it is inhumane, wrong, and hypocritical. Others claim it to be justifiable, with roots in Biblical scripture: "an-eye-for-an-eye". The guillotine, electric chair, and lethal injection have one goal, that is to kill its subject. Today, we face the choice to continue or abolish the death penalty. The general consensus hitherto has always been in favor for the death penalty. The opposing view, however, does not fall far behind. This is understandable because there are so many aspects that are considered when being in favor or against the death penalty. These include concerns on morality, cost, constitutionality, deterrence, retribution, arbitrariness and so on. The list is endless. The death penalty, although efficient in its final purpose, is not as efficient in saving money, deterring crime, and worst of all, choosing its victims. Now, it may seem crude to take into account some of these aspects as if the life of another human is negotiable, but many of these issues are amongst the reasons on why many choose to be for or against the death penalty, so addressing them only seems reasonable.
First of all, a stance that plenty of people like to take is that the death penalty should be imposed on individuals in order to scare off prospective criminals. Now this on the surface may sound reasonable, and it would not be ridiculous to think it a viable method; however, this is not the case. There is no sounds evidence to show that the death penalty deters crime. The issue has been brought to light by Michael Booth, from the Denver Post, who explained that “...a consensus of crim...
... middle of paper ...
...//www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/images/exo_state.png. DPIC, n.d. Web. 3 Dec. 2014.
Booth, Michael. "No Credible Evidence on Whether Death Penalty Deters, Experts Say." Denverpost.com. N.p., June-July 2014. Web. 23 Nov. 2014.
"Costs of the Death Penalty." Death Penalty Information Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2014.
Ehrhard, Susan. "Plea Bargaining and the Death Penalty: An Exploratory Study." Justice System Journal 29.3 (2008): 1-13. Web.
Pie Chart shows disproportion between cases that include whites v. other races. Digital image. Http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/arbitrariness#Race. DPIC, n.d. Web. 1 Dec. 2014.
ProCon.org. "Top 10 Pros and Cons." ProCon.org. 13 Apr. 2009. Web. 27 Nov. 2014.
Streib, Victor. Death Penalty for Female Offenders, January 1, 1973, Through October 31, 2010. Diss. Ohio Northern University, 2010. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Web. 6 Dec. 2014.
Additionally, capital punishment is absurdly expensive. In the article, “ Capital Punishment: Deterrent Effects & Capital costs” Jeffery A. Fagan discusses how expensive death penalty cases can be. He
Weil, Jack. "The Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crime." The Death Penalty. Ed. Jenny Cromie and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "The Death Penalty Isn't the Answer to Crime Woes." Star 4 Nov. 2010.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
Opponents of capital punishment are outspoken and vehement in their arguments. They believe the death penalty does not does not deter crime. They also hold the opinion that endin...
21 David C. Baldus, et al, "Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience," The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 74 (1983): 663-664.
Colson, Charles W. “Capital Punishment.” The Rutherford Institute. 11 Nov. 2002. 30 May 2010 .
This essay will discuss the various views regarding the death penalty and its current status in the United States. It can be said that almost all of us are familiar with the saying “An eye for an eye” and for most people that is how the death penalty is viewed. In most people’s eyes, if a person is convicted without a doubt of murdering someone, it is believed that he/she should pay for that crime with their own life. However, there are some people who believe that enforcing the death penalty makes society look just as guilty as the convicted. Still, the death penalty diminishes the possibility of a convicted murderer to achieve the freedom needed to commit a crime again; it can also be seen as a violation of the convicted person’s rights going against the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear a lot of people say “an eye for an eye.” Most people feel strongly that if a criminal took the life of another, their’s should be taken away as well, and I don’t see how the death penalty could deter anyone from committing crimes if your going to do the crime then at that moment your not thinking about being on death role. I don’t think they should be put to death they should just sit in a cell for the rest of their life and think about how they destroy other families. A change in views and attitudes about the death penalty are likely attributed to results from social science research. The changes suggest a gradual movement toward the eventual abolition of capital punishment in America (Radelet and Borg, 2000).
Ethics and morality are the founding reasons for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, leading to the highly contentious nature of the debate. When heinous crimes are com...
The death penalty has been backed by statistical analysis that has provided arguments for and against the sentencing based off deterrence methods. People against the death penalty have documented states that do not have the death penalty and have shown a decrease in murder rate. David Cooper’s statistical article provides information for non-death penalty states showing lower murder rates by stating, “When comparisons are made between states with the death penalty and states without, the majority of death penalty states show murder rates higher than non-death penalty states. The average of murder rates per 100,000 population in 1999 among death penalty states was 5.5, whereas the average of murder rates among non-death penalty states was only 3.6,” (Cooper, p.1). The statistics have shown that the death penalty ha...
Pasquerella, Lynn. “The Death Penalty in the United States.” The Study Circle Resource Center of Topsfield Foundation. July 1991. Topsfield Foundation. 03 Feb 2011. Web.
“The case Against the Death Penalty.” aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union, 2012. Web. 12 Feb. 2013
The statistics say that African Americans are twelve percent of the U.S. population, but are 43 percent of the prisoners on death row. Although blacks make up 50 percent of all murder victims, 83 percent of the victims in death penalty cases are white. Since 1976, only ten executions have involved a white defendant who killed a black victim.... ... middle of paper ...
When someone is legally convicted of a capital crime, it is possible for their punishment to be execution. The Death Penalty has been a controversial topic for many years. Some believe the act of punishing a criminal by execution is completely inhumane, while others believe it is a necessary practice needed to keep our society safe. In this annotated bibliography, there are six articles that each argue on whether or not the death penalty should be illegalized. Some authors argue that the death penalty should be illegal because it does not act as a deterrent, and it negatively effects the victim’s families. Other scholar’s state that the death penalty should stay legalized because there is an overcrowding in prisons and it saves innocent’s lives. Whether or not the death penalty should be
“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.
Schonebaum, Stephen E. "A Swifter Death Penalty Would Be An Effective Deterrent." Does Capital Punishment Deter Crime? San Diego: David L. Bender; Greenhaven Press Inc. 1998. 18.